(some!!!!) Mormon & exmormon men and the internet

Post by **_asbestosman** » Mon Apr 21, 2008 2:51 am

Jersey Girl wrote:I, personally, am waiting for some male poster to come in here and make the typical comment. I'll let you know when they do.

I'll bet I could turn that into an innuendo. I bet I have the brains not to. Maybe.

Post by **_Moniker** » Mon Apr 21, 2008 2:51 am

Mister Scratch wrote:Actually, Moniker apparently does have quite a few postings dealing with sex. If you plug "sex" into the search engine and pair it with different posters' names, you come up with some intriguing results. I, for example, turn up with some 60-odd posts. Beastie is in the 80-90 range. The Nehor has over a hundred. Liz? About 130. Moniker's count is something like 167.

Now, I'm not quite sure what marg is trying to argue, exactly, but I thought these data were interesting, at least.

My threads were in the sex threads mainly. I do talk about sexuality when it is a topic. I never denied that. I find it quite interesting, actually. Yet, I don't go about making posts that are "role playing" or INVITING sexual attention. If talking about sexuality is akin to asking for sexual attention then I've just tumbled into bizarro land.

Post by **_asbestosman** » Mon Apr 21, 2008 2:54 am

Mister Scratch wrote:Actually, Moniker apparently does have quite a few postings dealing with sex. If you plug "sex" into the search engine and pair it with different posters' names, you come up with some intriguing results. I, for example, turn up with some 60-odd posts. Beastie is in the 80-90 range. The Nehor has over a hundred. Liz? About 130. Moniker's count is something like 167.

Now, I'm not quite sure what marg is trying to argue, exactly, but I thought these data were interesting, at least.

Dangit. I have 70 matches. I hate thinking that Scratch is more virtuous than I am.

Wait a minute, Scratch has 125 matches by my count. I win!

Post by **_Moniker** » Mon Apr 21, 2008 2:55 am

Here's the sort of stuff that happens:

http://mormondiscussions.com/discuss/vi ... php?t=5401

I did NOT invite that! I did NOT appreciate it. Then Bond labels the thread something about my ass shaking. I asked him to change it to NOT draw attention to it.

Post by **_karl61** » Mon Apr 21, 2008 2:55 am

Gazelam wrote:
beastie wrote:
I've never read anything from men on this board as being inappopriate regarding sex or the way they treated women as being inappropriate.

I'd love to see you in a T-shirt.

This is the picture marg sent me in his provocative e-mail. I don't know what I said that was so titilating, but I was forced to explain to him that I don't swing that way.

marg is a guy?

Post by **_beastie** » Mon Apr 21, 2008 2:56 am

Actually, Moniker apparently does have quite a few postings dealing with sex. If you plug "sex" into the search engine and pair it with different posters' names, you come up with some intriguing results. I, for example, turn up with some 60-odd posts. Beastie is in the 80-90 range. The Nehor has over a hundred. Liz? About 130. Moniker's count is something like 167.

Now, I'm not quite sure what marg is trying to argue, exactly, but I thought these data were interesting, at least.

Sex is a valid topic. In fact, it is a significant part of Mormonism and exmormonism. That's not what this thread is about.

For female posters not to be able to post about sex without having to deal with pants and moans IS what this thread is partially about.

In the real world, adults actually do have those sort of conversations. We had them quite a bit on my old divorce board. I talked about it, too, along with the other grown ups.

Post by **_Mister Scratch** » Mon Apr 21, 2008 2:57 am

asbestosman wrote:
Mister Scratch wrote:Actually, Moniker apparently does have quite a few postings dealing with sex. If you plug "sex" into the search engine and pair it with different posters' names, you come up with some intriguing results. I, for example, turn up with some 60-odd posts. Beastie is in the 80-90 range. The Nehor has over a hundred. Liz? About 130. Moniker's count is something like 167.

Now, I'm not quite sure what marg is trying to argue, exactly, but I thought these data were interesting, at least.

Dangit. I have 70 matches. I hate thinking that Scratch is more virtuous than I am.

Wait a minute, Scratch has 125 matches by my count. I win!

Wha? I got 65 matches for myself. What terms are you using in the search, ABman? I simply typed in the information and let 'er rip, without any adjustments whatever. (You'd still win, by the way. Using my method, you come up with 50 hits.)

Post by **_asbestosman** » Mon Apr 21, 2008 2:59 am

Mister Scratch wrote:Wha? I got 65 matches for myself. What terms are you using in the search, ABman? I simply typed in the information and let 'er rip, without any adjustments whatever.

Ah, I changed it to return the results as posts instead of topics and then used that number.

Post by **_Moniker** » Mon Apr 21, 2008 3:00 am

I just did my own name and searched for "sex"

I was talking about the FLDS and sex with teen girls. I was talking about the idea that God has sex with Mary. I was talking about this thread. I was questioning why sex is a topic of morality, also. That was just on the first page.

I'm such a whore!

Post by **_Moniker** » Mon Apr 21, 2008 3:02 am

I got 126 posts for Scratch about sex, too.

I looked at mine and a lot of mine were quotes of other people, as well.