Kemosabe Shades, can we "ban"

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Jersey Girl wrote:Oh, I haven't read this thread yet but I see that Shades has posted. Is he mad at me for starting this thread?


No, I'm not irritated at you. (What makes you think I would be?)
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Scottie wrote:
John Larsen wrote:
Scottie wrote:
John Larsen wrote:
Scottie wrote:I think we should moderate it like we do any other swear word. We change the word.

If someone posts "Man you're a f***ing r*****", we go in and change that to "Man you're a f***ing idiot."

Also, as to where does it end?? That is a stupid argument. I think the mods here use pretty good common sense. It's not going to turn into a ban-a-thon of words. The list of changeable words will be short.

I would also propose that nigger, kike, wetback, faggot, and the like be banned as well. Those words have no place in a discussion.


Why is idiot better than r*****? The both have ostensibly the same origins and meaning. I don't get it. It seems you are proposing to run this rule by how the mod "feels" about a word.


Fine. We'll just completely * out the word r*****/r******d altogether.

Look, the fact is this word offends a substantial number of people on the board. Whether or not it offends you is irrelevant!

Since the posters here can't seem to keep conversations civil and keep the wishes of the board members in mind, I guess moderation is the next logical step.


I don't think it has ever happened, but if I ever catch a mod changing a single word in one of my posts, I am gone for good.

If you guys want a list of banned words, then you damn well better post that list. Each mod maintaining their own private list of offensive words is something that I just don't want to deal with.

I'm serious.


I'm not saying it will be an at-whim list of personal preference words. It will be a clearly defined list.

It's not like this doesn't have precedence. We banned using the word douche as a derogatory word.

And, like it or not, we already alter posts. We * out swear words all the time. I fixed spelling errors sometimes too.


I just wanted to chime in here (probably someone else has done so) and say that Scottie, when you said "change the word" in your first post above in the quotes, it makes people think we're making word substitutions and to my knowledge, we don't do that. As you say though, we do *** out most of the letters of certain words.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

And a big thanks to Jersey Girl, too!
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Dr. Shades wrote:Similar to what happened with the "C" word, I think the portion of the members of this board who find the two words in question uncouth is great enough that I am justified in turning on the word censor for them (I.e., "them" = "those two words").

The point Mister Scratch makes is a good one--as is the example he used--but I think the word's legitimate use as a verb happens rarely enough (especially in contrast to the amount of time it's used as a noun and as an insult) that the word censor is still justified.

Request granted.


Oh! Kemosabe Shades! You are without a doubt THE most intelligent, mature, wise and decisive administrators on the whole entire Internet! You are a god! A divine personage! A glorious light giving, life affirming force to be praised by all!

Your humble servant,
Jersey Girl/Monkey Mod

(Can I sling it or what?;-)
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Dr. Shades wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:Oh, I haven't read this thread yet but I see that Shades has posted. Is he mad at me for starting this thread?


No, I'm not irritated at you. (What makes you think I would be?)


Because I think I irritate you sometimes. Well, not just you. Actually, I irritate alot of people sometimes. Or perhaps all the time. Sometimes I do it deliberately. ;-)

Sometimes I don't care!

:-P
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Scottie
_Emeritus
Posts: 4166
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:54 pm

Post by _Scottie »

Jersey Girl wrote:
Dr. Shades wrote:Similar to what happened with the "C" word, I think the portion of the members of this board who find the two words in question uncouth is great enough that I am justified in turning on the word censor for them (I.e., "them" = "those two words").

The point Mister Scratch makes is a good one--as is the example he used--but I think the word's legitimate use as a verb happens rarely enough (especially in contrast to the amount of time it's used as a noun and as an insult) that the word censor is still justified.

Request granted.


Oh! Kemosabe Shades! You are without a doubt THE most intelligent, mature, wise and decisive administrators on the whole entire Internet! You are a god! A divine personage! A glorious light giving, life affirming force to be praised by all!

Your humble servant,
Jersey Girl/Monkey Mod

(Can I sling it or what?;-)


BS!!! Anyone fitting THAT description would let us have smilies. Shades is 1 step below the festering mold that the pond scum feeds off of.
If there's one thing I've learned from this board, it's that consensual sex with multiple partners is okay unless God commands it. - Abman

I find this place to be hostile toward all brands of stupidity. That's why I like it. - Some Schmo
_Scottie
_Emeritus
Posts: 4166
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:54 pm

Post by _Scottie »

Jersey Girl wrote:
Dr. Shades wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:Oh, I haven't read this thread yet but I see that Shades has posted. Is he mad at me for starting this thread?


No, I'm not irritated at you. (What makes you think I would be?)


Because I think I irritate you sometimes. Well, not just you. Actually, I irritate alot of people sometimes. Or perhaps all the time. Sometimes I do it deliberately. ;-)

Sometimes I don't care!

:-P


I believe if I had a nickle for every time I'd irritated someone, I'd be a VEEEERY wealthy man.
If there's one thing I've learned from this board, it's that consensual sex with multiple partners is okay unless God commands it. - Abman

I find this place to be hostile toward all brands of stupidity. That's why I like it. - Some Schmo
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Scottie wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:
Dr. Shades wrote:Similar to what happened with the "C" word, I think the portion of the members of this board who find the two words in question uncouth is great enough that I am justified in turning on the word censor for them (I.e., "them" = "those two words").

The point Mister Scratch makes is a good one--as is the example he used--but I think the word's legitimate use as a verb happens rarely enough (especially in contrast to the amount of time it's used as a noun and as an insult) that the word censor is still justified.

Request granted.


Oh! Kemosabe Shades! You are without a doubt THE most intelligent, mature, wise and decisive administrators on the whole entire Internet! You are a god! A divine personage! A glorious light giving, life affirming force to be praised by all!

Your humble servant,
Jersey Girl/Monkey Mod

(Can I sling it or what?;-)


BS!!! Anyone fitting THAT description would let us have smilies. Shades is 1 step below the festering mold that the pond scum feeds off of.


Oh hush. Follow my lead and schmooze him a little! Ask yourself, has what you've been doing worked? Do we have smilies? Do we have the "r" word censorized? You tell me...

Shades is the god of Mormon Discussions! He is a beacon of intelligence that rains down his wisdom on all! He is the great and wise Kemosabe! He is the brain that thinketh for us! Dispenser of justice and mercy for all!

Your humble servant,
Jersey Girl/Monkey Mod
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Scottie wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:
Dr. Shades wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:Oh, I haven't read this thread yet but I see that Shades has posted. Is he mad at me for starting this thread?


No, I'm not irritated at you. (What makes you think I would be?)


Because I think I irritate you sometimes. Well, not just you. Actually, I irritate alot of people sometimes. Or perhaps all the time. Sometimes I do it deliberately. ;-)

Sometimes I don't care!

:-P


I believe if I had a nickle for every time I'd irritated someone, I'd be a VEEEERY wealthy man.


Oh really? Go look at what I did to your "Getting to Know You" thread and forward the nickel thisaway.

;-)
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
Post Reply