Boaz & Lidia wrote:One thing I am reveling in is how much KA's action just really irritate Jason the Loopy LOAP.
You are misreading me. I'm interested in reading KA's supposed materials she has composed. She can spread her message as much as she chooses. She'll be responsible for what she does, and I'll be responsible for what I do. I find it highly illustrative that KA will not present her findings for scrutiny. She decries the Church for "suppressing," and represents the essence of tu quoque.
KA is helping people and you seem to only want company for your misery.
If KA's material was so helpful, perhaps she could help Jason and I by providing it. I'm seriously beginning to doubt it even exists.
One moment in annihilation's waste, one moment, of the well of life to taste- The stars are setting and the caravan starts for the dawn of nothing; Oh, make haste! -Omar Khayaam
Boaz & Lidia wrote:Note to Jason and Loap, your train has come in:
I hope no one died in that accident.
One moment in annihilation's waste, one moment, of the well of life to taste- The stars are setting and the caravan starts for the dawn of nothing; Oh, make haste! -Omar Khayaam
Jason Bourne wrote:It is false reveling. I am not irritated at all. More amused. It is interesting to see the human behavior in action here. Yours is particularly fascinating.
It is fascinating, indeed. He seems outright confused about my interest in KA's materials.
I cannot express how much I have enjoyed reading their posts.
You should enjoy my posts. There are a lot of brilliant points being made.
You think I am infuriated? You are a funny little boy PP.
Come on, you and I both well know we are totally infuriated at this outrage.
One moment in annihilation's waste, one moment, of the well of life to taste- The stars are setting and the caravan starts for the dawn of nothing; Oh, make haste! -Omar Khayaam
KimberlyAnn wrote:I don't present polyandry with any viewpoint at all, really, Jason. I simply state that Smith married at least thirty-three women, many of them already married to other men. I have referred several people to this website, which I think gives a pretty fair representation of Smith's polygamy. In my experience, most investigators don't care why Smith married other men's wives. They just care that he did, and to all I've spoken with, that alone is pretty much enough for them to dismiss Smith's prophetic claims. I don't need to embellish or give "sides."
So essentially you don't give a packet of papers, you refer people to a few websites?
This post brought to you by our sponsors! (See below. The views expressed there do not necessarily represent those of LifeOnaPlate.)
One moment in annihilation's waste, one moment, of the well of life to taste- The stars are setting and the caravan starts for the dawn of nothing; Oh, make haste! -Omar Khayaam
KimberlyAnn wrote:I don't present polyandry with any viewpoint at all, really, Jason. I simply state that Smith married at least thirty-three women, many of them already married to other men. I have referred several people to this website, which I think gives a pretty fair representation of Smith's polygamy. In my experience, most investigators don't care why Smith married other men's wives. They just care that he did, and to all I've spoken with, that alone is pretty much enough for them to dismiss Smith's prophetic claims. I don't need to embellish or give "sides."
So essentially you don't give a packet of papers, you refer people to a few websites?
This post brought to you by our sponsors! (See below. The views expressed there do not necessarily represent those of LifeOnaPlate.)
That's not at all what I implied. You seem to lack comprehension.
I am dismissing you now. You can post as much on this thread as you like, but I won't respond any longer. I dislike small yapping dogs. I don't own one and I won't play with one on a bulletin board.
That's fine. It's evident you either lack confidence in your packet or it doesn't actually exist.
One moment in annihilation's waste, one moment, of the well of life to taste- The stars are setting and the caravan starts for the dawn of nothing; Oh, make haste! -Omar Khayaam
KimberlyAnn, although I think you alluded to this before, I must ask you a question. Is the material you give to investigators and missionary contact-ees in any way similar to the tract at the following website?
Jason Bourne and LifeOnaPlate: If KimberlyAnn answers in the affirmative, is there anything at all in the above-linked website which you consider to be inaccurate or untrue?
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
KimberlyAnn wrote:I am dismissing you now. You can post as much on this thread as you like, but I won't respond any longer. I dislike small yapping dogs. I don't own one and I won't play with one on a bulletin board.
KA
PS- personally, it depends on the dog. I have a relatively small dog, and sometimes she is a little too yappy. But I love her nonetheless.
One moment in annihilation's waste, one moment, of the well of life to taste- The stars are setting and the caravan starts for the dawn of nothing; Oh, make haste! -Omar Khayaam
Dr. Shades wrote:All right, let's get to the bottom of this.
KimberlyAnn, although I think you alluded to this before, I must ask you a question. Is the material you give to investigators and missionary contact-ees in any way similar to the tract at the following website?
Jason Bourne and LifeOnaPlate: If KimberlyAnn answers in the affirmative, is there anything at all in the above-linked website which you consider to be inaccurate or untrue?
I browsed through the site a few months back, had a brief e-mail correspondence with the author over sources. Just sent him some additional articles which I believe would flesh out the site much more. (This goes back to the selectivity issue, use of historical sources, etc. and "undisputed historical facts" which you, apparently, believe in.) I don't have the time (or desire) to give a comprehensive response to the site, but will say if he considers himself detached he betrays that in the use of some loaded language and a suppression of sources by LDS authors especially published in UHQ, BYU Studies, MHA papers, Dialogue, etc.
KA's alleged packet, I suspect, would be relatively brief and easy to read through.
One moment in annihilation's waste, one moment, of the well of life to taste- The stars are setting and the caravan starts for the dawn of nothing; Oh, make haste! -Omar Khayaam
Dr. Shades wrote:All right, let's get to the bottom of this.
KimberlyAnn, although I think you alluded to this before, I must ask you a question. Is the material you give to investigators and missionary contact-ees in any way similar to the tract at the following website?
Jason Bourne and LifeOnaPlate: If KimberlyAnn answers in the affirmative, is there anything at all in the above-linked website which you consider to be inaccurate or untrue?
Yes. It's very similar, only much less information, really, and minus the commentary. Seriously, it's only a few pages of basic information with a list of books to read and websites to visit, one website being LDS.org. There's nothing in the papers I typed myself that isn't included in Packham's materials.
