Apropos Image of the day

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Sethbag
_Emeritus
Posts: 6855
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:52 am

Post by _Sethbag »

Wheat wrote:OK, smart guy, you tell me why we shouldn’t do the same thing with LDS kids that Texas is doing with FLDS kids? And make sure you keep your explanation consistent with your other opinions about the dangers of Mormonism, or we’ll pronounce you a hypocrite.

The fact is that Texas has demonstrated that we don’t need any specific “crimes” in order to undertake a massive reprogramming project of this nature.


The Texas officials couldn't act without a complaint, or without probable cause to suspect that abuse was being committed. They received the infamous phone calls, which may or may not turn out to have been a hoax. Be that as it may, Texas was forced to take the calls seriously and go in and investigate. They did so, and while investigating were confronted with massive evidence that child sexual abuse in the form of statutory rape of young teenage girls by adult men was going on. For Pete's sake, man, they found young teenage girls walking around pregnant!

The abuse they saw direct evidence of while investigating the subject of the (possibly hoax) original calls gave them enough reason under law to take the children into custody. Their own parents, community, and leadership appeared to be subjecting girls to sexual abuse, and grooming boy children to grow up to be perpetrators themselves. They found evidence of this ongoing abuse at the ranch. This fact cannot be stressed enough, because it is the pregnant 13 year olds walking around the ranch, and whatever evidence they found there, which justified their taking the children away from the ranch.

It no longer matters whether the original calls were a hoax or not*. Texas officials acted on the information they received, whether it was ultimately true or not, and walked into tons of other evidence of real abuse. They cannot now turn a blind eye to the real abuse just because "Sarah Barlow" appears not really to have existed. It doesn't work that way.

I believe that LDS parents pass a mind virus on to their children, just like JW parents do, and EV parents do, etc. I don't like it, but there's not much I can do about it. However, there's a world of difference between people believing something I disagree with, and people committing illegal felony acts of abuse against their children.

There is no probable cause for the state to suspect that systematic child physical or sexual abuse is going on in the active LDS community. There's no probable cause for the state to suspect any other kind of illegal, systematic behavior in the LDS church. Hence, the state can't (and doesn't want to) touch the LDS. And they're right to leave the LDS alone.

*it matters to the extent that the perpetrator of the hoax has some explaining to do, if indeed it is a hoax, but it doesn't matter in terms of the children who were removed by the Texas CPS. They were not taken from the ranch because of the initial calls - they were taken away as a result of things discovered at the ranch during the investigation prompted by the original calls.
Last edited by Anonymous on Fri Apr 25, 2008 11:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Mormonism ceased being a compelling topic for me when I finally came to terms with its transformation from a personality cult into a combination of a real estate company, a SuperPac, and Westboro Baptist Church. - Kishkumen
_Doctor Steuss
_Emeritus
Posts: 4597
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:57 pm

Post by _Doctor Steuss »

For those (or as it appears, the one person) who seriously suggest(s) that my parents actively psychologically abused me as a child, and that I should have been removed from their custody because of this…

Image
"Some people never go crazy. What truly horrible lives they must lead." ~Charles Bukowski
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Post by _asbestosman »

Sethbag wrote:They did so, and while investigating were confronted with massive evidence that child sexual abuse in the form of statutory rape of young teenage girls by adult men was going on. For Pete's sake, man, they found young teenage girls walking around pregnant!

Ah, pregnant teenage girls is definately good evidence of abuse. No, wait--most teenage girls who get pregnant that I know of get pregnant by their similarly aged boyfriends. What evidence did they have that it was done by old men? Yes, I suspect it was too, but getting proper evidence legally may be a bit tricky. It is my understanding that they may have had other insiders or spies who helped corroborate this. If so, then they were justified, but pregnancy alone seems insufficient in my opinion.

By the way, while I suspect that many men did illegally impregnate many of this girls since I heard that a few have fled and will not give DNA samples. Other FLDS men are willing to provide the samples. That said, I do wonder if it was legal for Texas to make them provide DNA to get their children back. Don't you need to be charged with a crime first and if so shouldn't those men be detained right now?
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Post by _Some Schmo »

Doctor Steuss wrote:For those (or as it appears, the one person) who seriously suggest(s) that my parents actively psychologically abused me as a child, and that I should have been removed from their custody because of this…

Image


I don't think he's serious. I think he's trying to make a point in his backward-ass way.
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
_Scottie
_Emeritus
Posts: 4166
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:54 pm

Post by _Scottie »

asbestosman wrote:
Sethbag wrote:They did so, and while investigating were confronted with massive evidence that child sexual abuse in the form of statutory rape of young teenage girls by adult men was going on. For Pete's sake, man, they found young teenage girls walking around pregnant!

Ah, pregnant teenage girls is definitely good evidence of abuse. No, wait--most teenage girls who get pregnant that I know of get pregnant by their similarly aged boyfriends. What evidence did they have that it was done by old men? Yes, I suspect it was too, but getting proper evidence legally may be a bit tricky. It is my understanding that they may have had other insiders or spies who helped corroborate this. If so, then they were justified, but pregnancy alone seems insufficient in my opinion.

By the way, while I suspect that many men did illegally impregnate many of this girls since I heard that a few have fled and will not give DNA samples. Other FLDS men are willing to provide the samples. That said, I do wonder if it was legal for Texas to make them provide DNA to get their children back. Don't you need to be charged with a crime first and if so shouldn't those men be detained right now?


Well, DNA tests are pretty easy to come by these days.
If there's one thing I've learned from this board, it's that consensual sex with multiple partners is okay unless God commands it. - Abman

I find this place to be hostile toward all brands of stupidity. That's why I like it. - Some Schmo
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Post by _asbestosman »

Scottie wrote:Well, DNA tests are pretty easy to come by these days.

Without invading privacy? Don't you need to charge someone with a crime before mandating that DNA samples be taken?
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Sethbag wrote:However, there's a world of difference between people believing something I disagree with, and people committing illegal felony acts of abuse against their children.


YES!! Thank you, Sethbag!

This, Wheat, is the point I've been trying to make. This is why the state is justified in dropping the hammer on the FLDS church but not the LDS church.

It's about the commission of crime, not anyone's mere beliefs.

asbestosman wrote:Without invading privacy? Don't you need to charge someone with a crime before mandating that DNA samples be taken?


Not necessarily; DNA samples are ordered in paternity suits all the time.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Sethbag
_Emeritus
Posts: 6855
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:52 am

Post by _Sethbag »

asbestosman wrote:
Sethbag wrote:First off, you and I, and everyone else knows that Joseph Smith was having sex with most if not all of his fake wives. Don't even start. You put up this innocent "we don't have the stained sheets" defense as if anyone was buying it.

Todd Compton seems to have bought it last I heard (with respect to the underage teens).

Whether Compton believes it likely, or not, that Joseph Smith had sex with a specific one or two of his fake, manipulated, secret wives, he definitely believes that, by and large, Joseph Smith's sham "marriages" were certainly sexual in nature.

And, really, if Joseph Smith manipulated 33 women into secret, sham "marriages" behind his wife's back, that he didn't have sex with two or three, or five of them doesn't really help, does it?

LOAP:
I believe that you, LOAP, are probably a very reasonable, intelligent person at heart. But you've been corrupted by the idea that the Bible actually serves to define and justify right and wrong, what is moral and immoral, etc. You say that the "blame" for Joseph's immoral sexual exploitation and manipulation of women and girls goes to the Old Testament, I guess. I'm really not sure if you're trying to be ironic, or whether you actually think the words recorded by the bronze age goatherders of the Middle East several thousand years ago actually justify Joseph's misdeeds.


I was just playing the blame game. You like to do that regarding the LDS and FLDS. I'm taking it a step further. It's the exact same thing.

You can indeed blame the early LDS experience for the FLDS. That you choose to blame the Old Testament for the LDS's early experience helps you exactly how? The Old Testament demonstrates, if anything, an imagined but bloodthirsty, jealous, vindictive, cruel, and oppressive God. Appealing to such a monster hardly helps your situation.

Out of curiosity, do you believe it was fine for Moses, Joshua, and the rest of the Israelites to slaughter the peoples currently living in territory the Israelites wanted down to the very last man, woman, child, infant, dog, cat, goat, cow, chicken, sheep, etc.? You're OK with Old Testament genocide by the ancient Israelites? Have you convinced yourself that since God is apparently its author, genocide and the slaughter not only of adults, but of children and infants, is OK?
Mormonism ceased being a compelling topic for me when I finally came to terms with its transformation from a personality cult into a combination of a real estate company, a SuperPac, and Westboro Baptist Church. - Kishkumen
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Post by _asbestosman »

Sethbag wrote:And, really, if Joseph Smith manipulated 33 women into secret, sham "marriages" behind his wife's back, that he didn't have sex with two or three, or five of them doesn't really help, does it?

It does help because then it isn't child rape.
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
_Sethbag
_Emeritus
Posts: 6855
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:52 am

Post by _Sethbag »

asbestosman wrote:
Sethbag wrote:They did so, and while investigating were confronted with massive evidence that child sexual abuse in the form of statutory rape of young teenage girls by adult men was going on. For Pete's sake, man, they found young teenage girls walking around pregnant!

Ah, pregnant teenage girls is definitely good evidence of abuse. No, wait--most teenage girls who get pregnant that I know of get pregnant by their similarly aged boyfriends. What evidence did they have that it was done by old men?


You forget that there are different rules between criminal investigators investigating crimes, and child protective services acting to protect children. You are probably right that the state cannot just assume that the old men were impregnating the young girls, and you will notice that the criminal investigators haven't filed any criminal charges against the men yet either. They will investigate and get hard facts before warrants are issued, arrests made, suspects tried, etc.

But criminal investigation, and child protective services actions, are two different things. Due to testimony by informants, and other sources of information, there was reason to believe that the old men were doing it, and with the pregnant young girls on hand, a judge ruled that this was sufficient probable cause to separate the children from the men (and from the mothers, who, if the suspicions are correct, are accomplices in the abuse). This is a preventive, and protective measure, not a criminal measure.

The state didn't take the children as punishment, or as a criminal penalty. The state took the children as a protective measure due to evidence that the children were in danger of sexual abuse. A judge agreed with this. Now the parents will have their day in court and be able to argue why the state is wrong about the danger represented by their lifestyle on the ranch, and a judge will have the opportunity to rule again on it.

Yes, I suspect it was too, but getting proper evidence legally may be a bit tricky. It is my understanding that they may have had other insiders or spies who helped corroborate this. If so, then they were justified, but pregnancy alone seems insufficient in my opinion.

As you stated, it was more than just the bare fact of pregnant young teens. It was that combined with other information.

By the way, while I suspect that many men did illegally impregnate many of this girls since I heard that a few have fled and will not give DNA samples. Other FLDS men are willing to provide the samples. That said, I do wonder if it was legal for Texas to make them provide DNA to get their children back. Don't you need to be charged with a crime first and if so shouldn't those men be detained right now?


No, you don't have to be charged with a crime first. If the CPS can convince a judge that they have evidence of danger to the children, the state will act to protect the children, and this will be a separate action from any potential criminal charges that may or may not subsequently be filed.
Mormonism ceased being a compelling topic for me when I finally came to terms with its transformation from a personality cult into a combination of a real estate company, a SuperPac, and Westboro Baptist Church. - Kishkumen
Post Reply