huckelberry wrote: Qustion Dawkins, call out the church court.
Okay, that was funny!
I have been stuck thinking this kneejerk authority dependancy might be an illustration of the meme thing which I am inclined to otherwise question. Perhaps like a lot of questionable ideas, memes must be thought of as an idea with strenghts as well as shortcomings.
Gadianton wrote:Did Jimmi Hendrix
What made Hendrix so great? His music wasn't that technical, and it's played loose and sloppy. Hendrix, like Tal was a good songwriter, that's all. Believe it or not, there is talent behind pop music. It's much easier to impress people with anything dark, heavy, or with a lot of dissonance. To come up with something really catchy takes talent. Believe it or not, even Brittney Spears has talent, a lot more than she's given credit for. And er, the artist formaly knows as Prince is easily, in my opinion, equal to Hendrix.
Tal Bachman wrote:None of us would have ever bought a Britney Spears CD. But once you see behind the curtain so to speak, you just cannot dis artists like her in the way you used to. All of us, and actually, everyone that we ever knew inside that bubble, had nothing but a ton of respect for all the artists that had made it big, and stayed there. It doesn't really matter if you personally don't listen to the music - your perspective changes and you really end up admiring a lot of what those types of artists do.
The music business was and is, positively teeming with totally incompetent people who think they are total geniuses - and have power over your potential career. Imagine that - imagine that you're a young Dirk Nowitzki, but all your coaches and trainers and agents and everyone, keep trying to get you shoot lefthanded, wear cowboy boots on the court, get you to stop jumping when you shoot, etc. If you do what they suggest, you fail, because their ideas suck. If you don't do what they say, they get irritated because you've humiliated them in front of their co-workers and peers, and then they're reluctant to give you a shot. What do you do?
Tal Bachman wrote:
My refusal, needless to say, was tantamount to me humiliating The Emperor Donnie in fronts of his many hundreds of minions. And - surprise - The Emperor, by all accounts, then decided not to push the song at radio.
And now I'm here posting on this board instead of drinking margaritas in the Grand Caymans!
LifeOnaPlate wrote:Tal Bachman wrote:By the way, about the music stuff, I never saw an answer to the question as to why it comes up so often on here. I don't make an issue out of it; I don't know why anyone else would.
But maybe I should address this directly, since there seems to be a real curiosity about it underneath all the stupid shots at it. Maybe some information will shut up all the halfwits.
While several of my songs have done well and earned me quite a bit of money, mostly from TV and movie use (and radio play within Canada), only one has gotten heavy radio play around the world ("She's So High").
That song was supposed to be a "set-up track": a song released first off an album, which is supposed to just "prepare the ground" for the big slamming single which the company thinks has the real legs. That is, the radio life of "She's So High" was projected by Columbia Records to be only around six weeks, after which they would release the more serious "If You Sleep" - a slower song about fate and death - projected to stay around for months and months.
But as it happened, "She's So High" came out, and - maybe because it was a sunny song, and it came out in the spring - radio stations wouldn't stop playing it. It was on heavy rotation for well over a year, around the world.
The truth is that this didn't surprise me as much as my sense of modesty would have liked, because in writing it, I was specifically trying to write a smash. (And as soon as it was done, I actually did think, "this is a smash".) It was inspired by a bunch of songs. The two most important were Sheryl Crow's "If It Makes You Happy" and the Smith's "Bigmouth Strikes Again". The aria "Nessun Dorma" and "Help" also were influences - they got me thinking about the excitatory value of a quick vocal leap.
Most of all, I was trying to write a song which sounded like my favourite Kinks pop singles, from the '66-'67 "Something Else"/"Waterloo Sunset" era. Ray Davies had the ability to write immediately likable, witty pop songs, which however, sometimes had deeper significances.
I'm not sure that "She's So High" could make any real claim to depth, though I did take perverse pleasure in writing a direct song about a normal human emotion - awe of someone you're romantically attracted to - which more ideological folks may have taken issue with.
It will be hard to believe for people on here, but my record company and music publishers ended up begging radio programmers to stop playing "She's So High" so they could release "If You Sleep". But programmers have no incentive to stop playing a song which is still boosting their audiences, so they didn't. The song had taken on a life of its own at radio - no one at Columbia, after the first two weeks, was "working" it or pitching it: radio just kept playing it.
So by the time "She's So High"'s run at radio ended, it seemed like Columbia was into other things, new acts, etc. There was a bit of a dust-up over a string arrangement which the chairman of the company decided he wanted to put on "If You Sleep"; and in the end, that song was never really pushed. (Plus, it's maybe not surprising that a song about someone dying wouldn't immediately take off at pop radio).
After that, I was pretty much unable to ever get Columbia Records's attention again. Nor was I the only one; a bunch of artists there who'd come out of the box with a big hit, were seemingly abandoned by the record company, and for no really good reason that we could ever discover. The chairman seemed mostly to get off on the thrill of chasing down new unsigned artists and breaking that first hit, then moving on - rather like the sexual rhythms of a teenage boy. There's all this focus on getting the girl into the backseat, but then once he scores - it's off on the next hunt.
Only two years after "She's So High" won the BMI Song of the Year Award, was played all over the world, and got me into Rolling Stone, on The Tonight Show, etc., I couldn't even get Columbia Records to listen to new material anymore. I finally flew to New York and demanded that they either give me a budget to make a follow up record, or buy me out of the contract. They ended up deciding to buy me out, saying they were "just really busy with this whole internet piracy thing", which was then just starting.
The last seven years of the music industry have been a nightmare come true for music executives and recording artists. The whole business was based on the sale of hardware. That hardware is now almost obsolete. Naturally, CD sales have declined dramatically; there is thus less money for record companies to sign new artists and fund their recordings, and less reason for them to believe that would even be worthwhile, since CD sales keep declining. As a result, the music biz is caught in a death spiral feeding off its own energy, and there is no salvation in sight.
I feel like I have a lot of good songs which a lot of people would like: sad songs, happy songs, thoughtful songs, moving songs, light songs. But I doubt that any great number of people will ever get a chance to hear them. I regret that.
At the same time, I'm grateful I got a shot in during what turned out to be the final glory days of the musical business, screwed up as it was. At least I got one song in before it all started to turn south, and I can't complain about the royalties. A few losers on here might mock pop songs, but if they could one day spend a couple of hours creating something which millions of people would appreciate, and which would automatically generate five to ten times times their regular wage annually for a decade, my guess it that without exception they would - literally - consider forfeiting one of their testicles for the opportunity.
Now - would the halfwits leave this alone? It's totally irrelevant to anything we discuss on here, as far I can tell.
This is actually quite interesting; an excellent insight into your experience and the music industry as you encountered it in general. Thanks.
guy sajer wrote:From my, rather unsystematic viewpoint, the American music industry seems to be driven by adolescent (to teenage) girls (and to a lesser extent boys). Look at the top selling CDs and singles and ask yourself, who's buying this stuff? The answer for a lot of it, adolescent girls. I mean, really, for example, who what males and which girls over the age of 16 buy stuff from Brittney Spears?
There are so many good (and many great) artists who get precious little airplay on popular radio. Ever hear of Muse? Now that's great music that gets almost no airplay on popular radio. I'm personally a huge Jimmy Eat World fan, and aside from "The Middle," you almost never hear their music on the radio. (Though I question at times the songs their bosses choose to release as singles. (Always Be is perhaps the weakest song on its new CD Chase this Light.) Ever hear of The Decemberists, The Strokes, Razorlight, Hot Hot Heat, The New Pornographers, Bloc Party, Fields, Clap Your Hands Say Yeah, etc.? Good stuff, but you almost never hear it. I've started listening to online music--my preference is radioio.com. Listening to popular radio now is a waste of time--between the never ending ads and annoying DJ blathering, they play mostly crap.
I can well understand Tal's frustration.
Tal Bachman wrote:I'm not sure that "She's So High" could make any real claim to depth, though I did take perverse pleasure in writing a direct song about a normal human emotion - awe of someone you're romantically attracted to - which more ideological folks may have taken issue with.