That's fine, but what did I say was wrong? At least I give the courtesy of being clear without making you wade through an ocean of meaningless griping to understand my point.
Too conclude that Peterson is an anti Semite based on what he wrote is ludicrous.
Too conclude he is that he is even threatening that the Church will turn against Jews over the proxy baptism issue is silly. All he said was that some Mormons might feel less then friendly over the issue and why do things that may alienate friends?
The bottom line is Mr. Peterson calls Jews who disagree with him on this issue extremists,
No. He said that some Jewish extermists make an issue over this. He did not say all that were opposed to it were extremists.
and then issued a veiled threat that they might lose Mormon support if they don't shut up about proxy baptisms.
I think it is idiotic to conclude that his comments were a veiled threat. It was simply a statement of what could happen and the SOME, not all, Mormons may respond this way.
That, my friend, was all too clear from his bigoted post.
Only for someone looking to grind an ax which clearly you are.
The audacity to tell the Jews to not be offended at the thought of Mormons baptizing their ancestors by proxy is rooted in the Mormon superiority complex. Instead of introspection and repentance, the Jews get a face full of veiled threats. What a shame.
How you can conclude this from what he said is beyond me. I think you are being irrational.