Depends upon what you mean by inactive, and the reasons for it.
Explain away dude.
Now, back to the cafeteria Jason (and that's one problem I most certainly do not have...").
Hmmm
Well as noted elsewhere all through my Cafeteriaism I have stayed true and faithful and served in substantive callings. Maybe you do not pick and choose what you believe but apparently you pick and choose what you practice. So don't point your little narrow mind and fingers at judging me dude. It rings hollow.
No, not at all. I don't practice a few things because some long standing problems I have preclude me from doing them at this time. Any lack of practice is due to barriers, self imposed as they may be, to such practice, not to picking and choosing what I will be pleased to practice and what I will not.
I do not pick and choose anything regarding practice or doctrine in the Lord's Kingdom. I have served in substantive callings during my struggles as well. Now, go munch on some linoleum with your compatriots behind the baseboards.
Sad to see you sinking to the level of B&L, Schmo, Beastie, PP, and others on the outer fringes of this board using my problems with alcohol against me as a debate circumventing technique.
Try to enjoy the daylight Jason.
The face of sin today often wears the mask of tolerance.
Coggins7 wrote:I do not pick and choose anything regarding practice or doctrine in the Lord's Kingdom. I have served in substantive callings during my struggles as well. Now, go munch on some linoleum with your compatriots behind the baseboards.
The problem with this is that Coggins essentially lied about some of the things he did in the pre-1990 temple ceremony. So, evidently, he *does* "pick and choose" certain things regarding "practice or doctrine."
The problem with this is that Coggins essentially lied about some of the things he did in the pre-1990 temple ceremony. So, evidently, he *does* "pick and choose" certain things regarding "practice or doctrine."
Don't try you're character assassination on me dirtbag, it won't wash. I was clear about what I meant, and I have never lied about anything on this board. Unlike someone I know who engages in such on a regular basis.
The face of sin today often wears the mask of tolerance.
In order to confirm your suspicions, I will now tell you what is up with Coggins7. He is an inmate at a low-security psychiatric institution. Unfortunately for us, the state has granted the inmates unlimited internet access. If you wonder why he rarely makes sense, it is because the state, while springing for internet, neglected to pay for the patients' meds. According to Coggins7, this is the kind of disaster you get when liberals have overrun the government, which he is only too happy to inform you of ad nauseam and beyond.
You have been fairly warned. Good day.
“I was hooked from the start,” Snoop Dogg said. “We talked about the purpose of life, played Mousetrap, and ate brownies. The kids thought it was off the hook, for real.”
The problem with this is that Coggins essentially lied about some of the things he did in the pre-1990 temple ceremony. So, evidently, he *does* "pick and choose" certain things regarding "practice or doctrine."
Don't try you're character assassination on me dirtbag, it won't wash. I was clear about what I meant, and I have never lied about anything on this board. Unlike someone I know who engages in such on a regular basis.
What, some wishy-washy semantic backpedaling over the terms "chant" vs. "spoken in unison"? Give me a break. The first step to true repentance is admitting when you've made a mistake.
Its more than the difference between "chant" and "spoken in unison". The words "Pay lay Ale" were not spoken at all. The words used were spoken in English, repeated three times.
This pattern appears in an ancient Apocryphal text. I'll dig it up when I have the time.
The face of sin today often wears the mask of tolerance.
Coggins7 wrote:Its more than the difference between "chant" and "spoken in unison". The words "Pay lay Ale" were not spoken at all. The words used were spoken in English, repeated three times.
This pattern appears in an ancient Apocryphal text. I'll dig it up when I have the time.