Tal Bachman wrote:Louis Midgley's about to post publicly our private email correspondence from a few years ago without asking my permission, so he obviously doesn't care.
Dr. Midgley has helpfully documented the fact that your impression of the discussion between Stake President Keyes and yourself is the same today as it was almost exactly three years ago (plus a handful of days): 4/24/2005.
Frankly, I find it difficult to believe that Hinckley actually would have stated what you report Keyes as having reported him as saying, but we're getting we're into third-hand information at that point: Hinckley to Keyes-->Keyes to Bachman-->Bachman to Midgley--I wouldn't be surprised if some critical nuances were lost along the way.
At any rate, Midgley has documented, at the very least, the consistency of your version of events.
Randy Keyes, I am very sorry to say, did not tell the truth about our meeting, Daniel.
None of the rest of us were at the meeting(s) Tal. However, Keyes remains an SP despite purported accounts of doubt and disbelief. That alone is sufficient for me to believe his account over yours. I'm simply erring on the side of intellectual honesty. I don't care about how nicely magnanimous you are being about the other aspects of your relationship. If I did, I would be judging based on feelings.......
None of the rest of us were at the meeting(s) Tal. However, Keyes remains an SP despite purported accounts of doubt and disbelief. That alone is sufficient for me to believe his account over yours. I'm simply erring on the side of intellectual honesty. I don't care about how nicely magnanimous you are being about the other aspects of your relationship. If I did, I would be judging based on feelings...
I agree, and how obvious. Key's behavior, as over aginst Tal's claims regarding of his beliefs.
Uh huh...
The face of sin today often wears the mask of tolerance.
so says coggins... who repeatedly denied a known truth about the former temple ceremony. So either coggins is an unrepentant liar himself, or lives in a state of confusion.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.
beastie wrote:so says coggins... who repeatedly denied a known truth about the former temple ceremony. So either coggins is an unrepentant liar himself, or lives in a state of confusion.
Keep lying Beastie, it makes you look taller. At least, it makes your nose longer.
I've been quite clear regarding what I actually experienced vs. what you claim I experienced, and, my experience wins out over your guile.
Keep up the pose Beastie.
The face of sin today often wears the mask of tolerance.