Midgley Threatens to "Out" Bachman

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Trevor
_Emeritus
Posts: 7213
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:28 pm

Post by _Trevor »

Coca Cola wrote:Those letters were hilarious. Very interesting.


And all too familiar, if you ask me.

Edit: the more I read the letters sent to White, the more I am amazed at how disturbed Peterson and Midgley appear in their ceaseless badgering.
“I was hooked from the start,” Snoop Dogg said. “We talked about the purpose of life, played Mousetrap, and ate brownies. The kids thought it was off the hook, for real.”
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Alert, Peterson

Post by _Gadianton »

mig wrote:I am confident that Randy Keyes tried to convince Talmage that his membership in the Church had hopefully made him a better husband than he otherwise might have been trying to make a living in disgusting pop music world


OH NO! Apologists, UNLIKE ATHEISTS, never, EVER, take a morally superior tone and condescend to ex-members. Dr. Peterson, I must commend your friend on his mastery of the art of maintaining an equal and respectful relationship. I'm sure your own generous and congenial style reflects years of study under this fine tutor known as Dr. Midgley. And I'll bet you really learned something that day he nearly beat down the door of the Tanner's place of business and went ape.

And, by the way, we critics never at all derive any amusement from these kinds of antics that come from apologists. :)
_bcspace
_Emeritus
Posts: 18534
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:48 pm

Post by _bcspace »

Midgley Threatens to "Out" Bachman


Didn't Tal threaten to out Keyes? Didn't Tal already claim to reveal private conversations he had with Keyes without asking Keyes' permission?
Machina Sublime
Satan's Plan Deconstructed.
Your Best Resource On Joseph Smith's Polygamy.
Conservatism is the Gospel of Christ and the Plan of Salvation in Action.
The Degeneracy Of Progressivism.
_Trevor
_Emeritus
Posts: 7213
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:28 pm

Post by _Trevor »

bcspace wrote:Didn't Tal threaten to out Keyes? Didn't Tal already claim to reveal private conversations he had with Keyes without asking Keyes' permission?


Tit for tat is no way to hold the moral high ground.
“I was hooked from the start,” Snoop Dogg said. “We talked about the purpose of life, played Mousetrap, and ate brownies. The kids thought it was off the hook, for real.”
_antishock8
_Emeritus
Posts: 2425
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:02 am

Post by _antishock8 »

This is the funny thing about religion in general. They set the bar very high, constantly state how their religion changes people for the better, and the fruits of their gospel produce people who are Christ-like/Buddha-like/Mohammed-like. Uh, yeah, no. I suppose it makes them a little more vile than the average person because on the one hand they're preaching a peaceful, loving, forgiven, and patient message... But when it comes down to it they can act like assholes, justify it with some snippet of scripture, "repent" a la Coggins, and drive on being the same people they always were.

In this case, Mr. Bachman can breath easy the Danites aren't floating around any more.
You can’t trust adults to tell you the truth.

Scream the lie, whisper the retraction.- The Left
_guy sajer
_Emeritus
Posts: 1372
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:16 am

Post by _guy sajer »

"I am confident that Randy Keyes tried to convince Talmage that his membership in the Church had hopefully made him a better husband than he otherwise might have been trying to make a living in disgusting pop music world."

Oh yes, every single pop star is a disgusting moral degenerate.

Why, I've heard that they even, at times, drink alcohol!

Some of them go as far as to not let old men in business suits who think they talk to God to dictate to them when and with whom they can have sex.

Oh the degenerate horrors!!!

What a moron!
God . . . "who mouths morals to other people and has none himself; who frowns upon crimes, yet commits them all; who created man without invitation, . . . and finally, with altogether divine obtuseness, invites this poor, abused slave to worship him ..."
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Post by _Dr. Shades »

antishock8 wrote:This is the funny thing about religion in general. . . I suppose it makes them a little more vile than the average person because on the one hand they're preaching a peaceful, loving, forgiven, and patient message... But when it comes down to it they can act like assholes, justify it with some snippet of scripture, . . .


I think it was Gadianton (or was it Mister Scratch?) who pointed out that Jesus freaking out and going completely ape in the temple was a godsend to the apologists, since in their minds it gives them a free pass to also freak out and go completely ape on the critics whenever they feel like disregarding the other tenets of Christlike conduct that their religion teaches.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_guy sajer
_Emeritus
Posts: 1372
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:16 am

Post by _guy sajer »

cksalmon wrote:Follow up:

To read James's side of the events in question, see Nastigrams R Us.

He makes the funnily unfunny observation that when one emails a single BYU professor-apologist, one is effectively emailing all of them. James's emails were immediately forwarded to several other BYU staffers, who didn't find it at all odd to respond via email to an email that was not sent to them personally.

Chris


Wow, I'm trying to think of the apt adjective to describe the BYU-prof apologist cabal. Words that come to mind are paranoid, obsessive, unbalanced, cooky, unhinged--I just can't think of the right word, however.

I really do believe that these guys see themselves at the front lines of some kind of cosmic battle, and they envision themselves as the leaders, taking on the enemy, tilting at windmills and suffering that darts and slings all as part of a noble and ennobling quest that somehow sets them apart from the rest and grants them special status both in this world and in the next (kind of God's Delta Force).
God . . . "who mouths morals to other people and has none himself; who frowns upon crimes, yet commits them all; who created man without invitation, . . . and finally, with altogether divine obtuseness, invites this poor, abused slave to worship him ..."
_Rollo Tomasi
_Emeritus
Posts: 4085
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:27 pm

Re: Midgley Threatens to "Out" Bachman

Post by _Rollo Tomasi »

Mister Scratch wrote:It seems that Midgley is more of a "player" within the arena of Internet Mormonism than some may have realized.

I first became acquainted with Lou Midgley in the early 1980's, during his battles with Mike Quinn and other "New Mormon History" adherents. I believed then, as I do now, that the man is unstable; in my opinion, he has not a grain of objectivity when it comes to anything LDS. Tal's description of Lou (as described by Lou in his above post) is spot-on. Remember, this is the man who drove up to SLC just to heckle Grant Palmer at a book-signing.
"Moving beyond apologist persuasion, LDS polemicists furiously (and often fraudulently) attack any non-traditional view of Mormonism. They don't mince words -- they mince the truth."

-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: Midgley Threatens to "Out" Bachman

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Rollo Tomasi wrote:Remember, this is the man who drove up to SLC just to heckle Grant Palmer at a book-signing.


Didn't he also drive around the parking lot during the candlelight vigil for Lynne Kanavel Whitesides, screaming obscenities at the assemble-ees?
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
Post Reply