Jason Bourne wrote:No surprise here. Scratch would rather continue in character assassination. Too bad. Could be fun to watch. Funny that Scratch in his/her declining to debate calls Bob a chicken.
Did you respond before you'd bothered to read the whole thread, Jason? Or do you just like looking like a bonehead?
As I noted elsewhere, I have discussed this topic---at length---on a number of occasions. I am guessing that Bob is probably too lazy to get himself up to speed. Well, if he wants to "debate," then he can feast on these materials for a while:
Jason Bourne wrote:No surprise here. Scratch would rather continue in character assassination. Too bad. Could be fun to watch. Funny that Scratch in his/her declining to debate calls Bob a chicken.
Did you respond before you'd bothered to read the whole thread, Jason? Or do you just like looking like a bonehead?
Personal insults? I typically do not read an entire thread before posting a response to something I feel like responding too.
So, are you debating the supression of Church history topic then? I thought the idea was to to it on a closed thread for 48 hours first. Did you formally accept the challenge?
It is not a requirement to read an entire thread before one responds to something that prompts them to respond.
No, it's not a requirement. It's usually a pretty good idea, though.
Anyways, I'm surprised at you, Jason. You were quite disgusted at Scott Lloyd during the recent "Does the Church Suppress History?" thread (which Bob apparently missed), and yet here you are in mid-flip-flop. I guess you are allowing your personal animus to cloud your judgment, eh?
No, it's not a requirement. It's usually a pretty good idea, though.
I will consider it.
Anyways, I'm surprised at you, Jason. You were quite disgusted at Scott Lloyd during the recent "Does the Church Suppress History?" thread (which Bob apparently missed), and yet here you are in mid-flip-flop. I guess you are allowing your personal animus to cloud your judgment, eh?[
No I am not flip flopping. I just have not seen any debate start for you to declare that you are kicking Bob's butt. But my position is the same. I don't it call it supression as much as I do selective lack of disclosure. And yes, they select to disclose and promote the positive and make little effort to disclose anything that might cause one to question the positive and faith promoting.
As an aside I just heard Fox call the FLDS Mormon Fundamentalists three times in the past five minutes.
Jason Bourne wrote:As an aside I just heard Fox call the FLDS Mormon Fundamentalists three times in the past five minutes.
Well, that's what they are, after all.
“I was hooked from the start,” Snoop Dogg said. “We talked about the purpose of life, played Mousetrap, and ate brownies. The kids thought it was off the hook, for real.”