Mormon Church, wrong again re masturbation

Post by **_Brackite** » Mon May 05, 2008 1:41 am

Here is my question again to Coggins7, For the third time here:

What about the few LDS males who aren't able to get marry in this lifetime? Do you really believe that they should go their whole lifetime without ever Masturbating, and then they get prostrate cancer, and then they probably die from it? I say let them masturbate.

Post by **_ludwigm** » Wed May 07, 2008 10:27 am

2008 Sun., May 25th 3:00 pm 1519 Mission Street (Between S. Van Ness & 11th) San Francisco, CA

Post by **_Brackite** » Wed May 07, 2008 6:33 pm

Here is my question again to Coggins7, or for any other anti-masturbation LDS Apologist that is out here:

What about the few LDS males who aren't able to get marry in this lifetime? Do you really believe that they should go their whole lifetime without ever Masturbating, and then they get prostrate cancer, and then they probably die from it? I say let single males masturbate.

Post by **_Brackite** » Sun May 11, 2008 10:18 pm

Brackite wrote:Here is my question again to Coggins7, or for any other anti-masturbation LDS Apologist that is out here:

What about the few LDS males who aren't able to get marry in this lifetime? Do you really believe that they should go their whole lifetime without ever Masturbating, and then they get prostrate cancer, and then they probably die from it? I say let single males masturbate.

Well, I am still awaiting an answer from this question.

Post by **_Coggins7** » Sun May 11, 2008 11:13 pm

Here is my question again to Coggins7, or for any other anti-masturbation LDS Apologist that is out here:

What about the few LDS males who aren't able to get marry in this lifetime? Do you really believe that they should go their whole lifetime without ever Masturbating, and then they get prostrate cancer, and then they probably die from it? I say let single males masturbate.

We're all gonna go one way or another. Better prostate cancer than being caught in a combine, or being torn apart by wild dogs, or being thrown into a concrete mixer, or being buried alive with Brittney Spears, or being caught in South Central L.A. on Friday night wearing a Clarence Thomas T-shirt, or having Army Ants pumped into your diving bell, or...

Post by **_Coggins7** » Sun May 11, 2008 11:27 pm

Being eaten alive by Komodo Dragons, or being sucked into the turbines of a cruise ship, or being sucked into the engine of a Boing 757, or falling into a boiling vat of molten aluminum, or having molted lead poured into your ears, or having your skin slowly peeled off your body with red hot Channel Lock pliers, or being slowly eaten alive by bald cannibalistic midgets, or...

Post by **_harmony** » Sun May 11, 2008 11:29 pm

Coggins7 wrote:
Here is my question again to Coggins7, or for any other anti-masturbation LDS Apologist that is out here:

What about the few LDS males who aren't able to get marry in this lifetime? Do you really believe that they should go their whole lifetime without ever Masturbating, and then they get prostrate cancer, and then they probably die from it? I say let single males masturbate.

We're all gonna go one way or another. Better prostate cancer than being caught in a combine, or being torn apart by wild dogs, or being thrown into a concrete mixer, or being buried alive with Brittney Spears, or being caught in South Central L.A. on Friday night wearing a Clarence Thomas T-shirt, or having Army Ants pumped into your diving bell, or...

In other words, you have no answer for Brackie's question. I'm not surprised. Neither do our leaders. There's no answer for gay members either, except to live in a glass bubble and never touch anyone or anything remotely sexual. And that's an unacceptable answer.

Post by **_Coggins7** » Sun May 11, 2008 11:32 pm

OW, you have no answer for Brackie's question. I'm not surprised. Neither do our leaders. There's no answer for gay members either, except to live in a glass bubble and never touch anyone or anything remotely sexual. And that's an unacceptable answer.

Whatever the answer for masturbation (and there is, if you can guess it), homosexuals must remain celibate, as must unmarried heterosexuals; they must obey the law of Chastity, or lose the blessings associated with that principle.

The commandments of God are the same for all.

Post by **_Coggins7** » Sun May 11, 2008 11:36 pm

Keep in mind that SSA is an aberration; a psycho-sexual accretion that becomes attached, for a variety of reasons, to some in mortality. It does not define them as beings (unless they allow it to), and does not alter their accountability before God for the manner in which they lived while in mortality relative to his commandments and counsel.

Nor do any such similar born crosses alter mine or yours.

Post by **_harmony** » Sun May 11, 2008 11:37 pm

Coggins7 wrote:
OW, you have no answer for Brackie's question. I'm not surprised. Neither do our leaders. There's no answer for gay members either, except to live in a glass bubble and never touch anyone or anything remotely sexual. And that's an unacceptable answer.

Whatever the answer for masturbation (and there is, if you can guess it), homosexuals must remain celibate, as must unmarried heterosexuals; they must obey the law of Chastity, or lose the blessings associated with that principle.

The commandments of God are the same for all.

Define the law of chastity, Loran.

Heterosexuals can hold hands, kiss, embrace, dance close, nuzzle, flirt, socialize with like-minded adults. How do you suppose the branch president would react, were that to happen between two gay men at a single's ward dance?