Mormon forum lights up over California gay change

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_skippy the dead
_Emeritus
Posts: 1676
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 5:39 am

Re: Mormon forum lights up over California gay change

Post by _skippy the dead »

asbestosman wrote:Where was this protection when the church was practicing polygamy? Probably on vacation for several decades waiting for the 1960's. *

* No, I don't like polygamy, but I don't see why it should be the government's buisness to prohibit it. Forced or underage marriages are, of course, different matters.


Polygamy actually produces a plethora of problems when it comes to some of the constructs associated with marriage. I can see why there's a distinction.
I may be going to hell in a bucket, babe / But at least I'm enjoying the ride.
-Grateful Dead (lyrics by John Perry Barlow)
_GoodK

Post by _GoodK »

dartagnan wrote:
I guess there are more gay people on this forum than I realized...


My belief is not based on "homophobia," whatever the hell that mean...



Sig lines, anyone?

According to dartagnan I guess you can only be gay if you don't oppose gay marriage.
_skippy the dead
_Emeritus
Posts: 1676
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 5:39 am

Post by _skippy the dead »

dartagnan wrote:I guess there are more gay people on this forum than I realized.


Yeah, because that would be the only explanation for the reaction.

*eyeroll*
I may be going to hell in a bucket, babe / But at least I'm enjoying the ride.
-Grateful Dead (lyrics by John Perry Barlow)
_guy sajer
_Emeritus
Posts: 1372
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:16 am

Post by _guy sajer »

GoodK wrote:
dartagnan wrote:
I guess there are more gay people on this forum than I realized...


My belief is not based on "homophobia," whatever the hell that mean...



That would be something like "irrational fear/hatred of homosexuals."

You appear to fit this definition to a T.
God . . . "who mouths morals to other people and has none himself; who frowns upon crimes, yet commits them all; who created man without invitation, . . . and finally, with altogether divine obtuseness, invites this poor, abused slave to worship him ..."
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Post by _asbestosman »

dartagnan wrote:TD and Asbestosman, I never once hinted or suggested that children living with gay parents are more likely to be "abused."

I don't think I implied that you had. I certainly didn't think that was what you were saying.

I guess there are more gay people on this forum than I realized.

Cute, but even though my best friend from elementary school is gay, I'm very much a heterosexual and my wife is quite skilled at fulfilling my needs.

Nor is it based on any scientific studies - I admit that too.

Nor is mine. I'm merely relaying what I have heard combined with my own experience on how I learned about sexuality.

I guess in time we will know for sure. Gays adopting babies is a relatively recent phenomenon. Right now there isn't much to study, but there will be eventually.

Perhaps, but gays having babies isn't a new phenomenon. They have had children for quite a while. Daniel (not Peterson) on MADB has kids from a previous marriage.


Edit: Mind you, I'm not for gay marriage, but then I don't think the government should concern itself with legitimizing any unions in particular. Thus I think all marriages should be civil unions including two siblings living together and taking care of each other.
Last edited by Analytics on Fri May 16, 2008 7:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Re: Mormon forum lights up over California gay change

Post by _asbestosman »

skippy the dead wrote:Polygamy actually produces a plethora of problems when it comes to some of the constructs associated with marriage. I can see why there's a distinction.

Ah, but why couldn't the government just be willing to only recognize the first marriage and then not recognize the others kind of like how it does with shack-up situations? Somehow, the courts manage to sort out child custody / visitation / support in our complex divorce, remarriage, and shack-up society.
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
_dartagnan
_Emeritus
Posts: 2750
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 4:27 pm

Post by _dartagnan »

According to dartagnan I guess you can only be gay if you don't oppose gay marriage.


I don't oppose gay marriage.

Pay attention please.
“All knowledge of reality starts from experience and ends in it...Propositions arrived at by purely logical means are completely empty as regards reality." - Albert Einstein
_dartagnan
_Emeritus
Posts: 2750
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 4:27 pm

Post by _dartagnan »

You appear to fit this definition to a T.


Then you're an idiot if you think I have an "irrational hatred and fear" of homosexuals.

Look how ridiculously you are all reacting.
“All knowledge of reality starts from experience and ends in it...Propositions arrived at by purely logical means are completely empty as regards reality." - Albert Einstein
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Post by _asbestosman »

dartagnan wrote:
According to dartagnan I guess you can only be gay if you don't oppose gay marriage.


I don't oppose gay marriage.

Pay attention please.


Right, but if I'm reading you correctly, you do oppose gay adoption on the grounds that it makes things difficult for the children.

I grant that there may be something to that, but everything I've seen so far indicates that this is not the case.
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
_dartagnan
_Emeritus
Posts: 2750
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 4:27 pm

Post by _dartagnan »

Right, but if I'm reading you correctly, you do oppose gay adoption on the grounds that it makes things difficult for the children.

I grant that there may be something to that, but everything I've seen so far indicates that this is not the case.


I am wary of it. I don't "oppose" it in any meaningful sense. I haven't made it a political issue to swing my vote. But I am wary of the idea only because I have spent a great deal of time with kids.

Only time will tell what kind of effect this will have on them.
“All knowledge of reality starts from experience and ends in it...Propositions arrived at by purely logical means are completely empty as regards reality." - Albert Einstein
Post Reply