Jersey Girl wrote:GoodK wrote:Jersey Girl wrote:GoodK wrote:You are usually a bit sharper than this... what's up?
I dunno. Do I seem a bit sharper when I agree with you? Go figure.
Why are you promoting a lifestyle of
dependency for the underage minors whom you seem to think have some sort of right to free birth control?
What you have agreed with me? When was this. CFR ;]
I am not promoting a lifestyle of dependency. I am promoting a solution that is based on a simple cost benefit analysis. What costs more?
But I think maybe I'm a little closer to the reality of this situation than you and Harmony.
News flash: Teenagers don't care too much about what adults tell them is right and wrong.
If you think taking away or refusing to give out birth control is going to be effective in curbing sexual activity, I hate to tell you how out of touch you are.
GoodK,
I am in touch with teenagers and their children , as well as the "reality" of the situation, every single day of each and every week. It is just as I stated previously in a post regarding what I do for a living, which you largely ignored.
There are better and other ways to help curb sexual activity than dispensing "free" birth control to underage minors, GoodK. You make it appear as if underage minors (teens, kids, goats, wtf ever) are brainless/helpless/dependent victims of their own impulses. What you've suggested on this thread contributes to that dependency. It disgusts me beyond belief how you paint a picture of young people who have no other choices or parents who have no other choices or a society who have no other choices than to dispense birth control to helpless impulse driven teens that essentially puts a band aid on a gaping wound in this society.
Good hell, think with your brain.
I'm trying to, Jersey Girl. But my brain has a hard time comprehending where you are going with this. I didn't know that what I've suggested on this thread contributes to what you call a dependency. All I know is that there are pharmacists who are refusing to dispense birth control, and for religious reasons, and that is idiotic to me. I wish the pharmacists would loose their jobs for refusing to do their job properly.
I never said "young people have no other choices". I said something along the lines of: It is not your choice to decide when someone deserves birth control.
Of course you are entitled to have beliefs regarding sexuality and birth control. But when you essentially force young girls to have babies who don't want them or aren't capable of taking care of a baby, you are effecting all of us.
That baby will cost all of us, Jersey Girl. Go ahead, teach kids about making wise decisions about sex. Give them a chicken egg to take care of for a week to learn some responsibility. In the mean time, don't worry about the kids that are using birth control. The alternative, not using birth control, is not any sort of a solution.