MA&D's passionate love affair with the FLDS church

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_truth dancer
_Emeritus
Posts: 4792
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:40 pm

Post by _truth dancer »

Lest we forget, Helen Mar was fourteen years old when Joseph Smith made his proposition, to which she accepted.

~dancer~
"The search for reality is the most dangerous of all undertakings for it destroys the world in which you live." Nisargadatta Maharaj
_TAK
_Emeritus
Posts: 1555
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 4:47 pm

Post by _TAK »

Jersey Girl wrote:Steve Benson made a post over on RFM about the authorities releasing evidences. I can't post a link to his thread from RFM but here's a link to the evidences that were released. This in now way, should be considered the only evidence. They are images of WJ and his child brides. If the thought of that doesn't disturb you, I think the pictures will.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0527081flds1.html


I have seen alot of sick stuff on the internet but that has to be about the worse..

The defense of these sick bastards by the MADites only confirms there is not that much difference in the mindset.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Post by _Jersey Girl »

The photos make it a little too real, don't they.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_TAK
_Emeritus
Posts: 1555
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 4:47 pm

Post by _TAK »

Jersey Girl wrote:The photos make it a little too real, don't they.


More than that .. the fact they are posed tells me they have not a second thought about how they treat young girls.
Its almost like a trophy for Jeffs.
_mbeesley
_Emeritus
Posts: 74
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 10:51 pm

Re: MA&D's passionate love affair with the FLDS church

Post by _mbeesley »

Sethbag wrote:
mbeesley wrote:
Alter Idem wrote:As MBeesley's comment demonstrates, many refuse to believe there is abuse going on because as he says, "I have not seen any evidence of abuse". How do you counter that? This is what I've had to deal with on the FLDS threads...people who insist the abuse is only allegations, there is no proof. But from "allegations" comes investigation and "proof" will only come thorough investigation. If authorities in Texas don't continue their investigation, the FLDS will just retreat further from the scrutiny of the law and there will be no hope for the next generation.

And this is the kind of thing I have to deal wih in people are seemingly ignorant about the law, about probable cause, about unwarranted intrusions into peoples lives based on mere suspicion, etc. Cut the crap A.I. and quit twisting the arguments. Dr. Shades' twisting is enough for this thread.


Beesley, do you accept:

1) that the phone calls to the abuse shelter (not known by the state, at the time, to be a hoax, and not even 100% certainly all hoaxes even now) constituted sufficient probable cause for the state CPS to enter the compound looking for "Sarah Jessop Barlow"?

Yes.

2) that, once in the compound, two or three dozen pregnant young teenaged girls constituted probable cause to suspect that statutory rape had gone on, and that a large number of girls were affected by it?

Is this a hypothetical, or an attempt at a statement of the actual facts, because as far as I know, there is no evidence that there were 24 to 36 pregnant teenagers.

3) that, based on statements by people, including children, in the compound, that no age was too young for a girl to be married, it was clear that this was part of a pattern and practice that was widespread amongst the FLDS community?

Again, is this a hypothetical or an attempt at a statement of actual facts, because as far as I know, there is no evidence of a pattern and practie that was widespread. That seems to be more propoganda than actual fact.
Last edited by Guest on Thu May 29, 2008 12:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
Cogito ergo sum.
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Post by _asbestosman »

Jersey Girl wrote:This in now way, should be considered the only evidence. They are images of WJ and his child brides. If the thought of that doesn't disturb you, I think the pictures will.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0527081flds1.html


I have not, do not, and will not defend Warren Jeffs.

I have not, do not, and will not defend child abuse.

I have said we should be cautious about caution. Innocent people were hurt with the Satanic Ritual Abuse scare.
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

Again, is this a hypothetical or an attempt at a statement of actual facts, because as far as I know, there is no evidence of a pattern and practie that was widespread. That seems to be more propoganda than actual fact.


Mbeesley may be right. Perhaps it's just The Prophet who is entitled to the youngest females, 12, 13 year olds. The other guys have to settle for old ones, you know, the 18 year olds.

Kind of like how Joseph got to take other men's wives. Being The Prophet has its privileges.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Mbeesley:

Would you feel that way if you weren't a Mormon?
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Post by _moksha »

Image

This kiss between twelve year old Loretta and Prophet Warren may not excite the conservative heart like opposing the actions of the "dag blamed gubmint", but it does tend to put in perspective what those CPS workers were concerned about.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Post by _Jersey Girl »

asbestosman wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:This in now way, should be considered the only evidence. They are images of WJ and his child brides. If the thought of that doesn't disturb you, I think the pictures will.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0527081flds1.html


I have not, do not, and will not defend Warren Jeffs.

I have not, do not, and will not defend child abuse.

I have said we should be cautious about caution. Innocent people were hurt with the Satanic Ritual Abuse scare.


Huh? That wasn't directed at you in any way at all, abman. If you thought it was, you were mistaken.

Heck.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
Post Reply