Sethbag banned at MAD

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

mbeesley wrote:I read it. Interesting. It looks like the details were written by someone other than you, but I assume you have adopted the description by posting it in your blog.


It was written by Shades. His blog used to be focused on profiles of MAD Banites.
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
_skippy the dead
_Emeritus
Posts: 1676
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 5:39 am

Post by _skippy the dead »

And now any reference in the affirmation thread to Sethbag's banning have been deleted, with this comment:

Capricious Mod wrote: Off topic remarks removed.


Sethbag was actually getting quite a bit of support. I'd like to see him allowed back, if that's what he wants.
I may be going to hell in a bucket, babe / But at least I'm enjoying the ride.
-Grateful Dead (lyrics by John Perry Barlow)
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

skippy the dead wrote:\
Sethbag was actually getting quite a bit of support. I'd like to see him allowed back, if that's what he wants.


Hopefully he'll get back in on near universal popularity like I was.
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
_mbeesley
_Emeritus
Posts: 74
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 10:51 pm

Post by _mbeesley »

Mike Reed wrote:
Sethbag wrote:Also, thanks to LifeOnAPlate for sticking up for me over there after the banning. To my knowledge, he's the first and probably the only one to do so thus far, though I may have just missed seeing it if someone else did to. I appreciate it.

edit: Mike Reed, not a TBM, also spoke up - thanks Mike!


I've been banned too.
You said you were leaving voluntarily.
Cogito ergo sum.
_Sethbag
_Emeritus
Posts: 6855
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:52 am

Post by _Sethbag »

Mike Reed wrote:
Sethbag wrote:Also, thanks to LifeOnAPlate for sticking up for me over there after the banning. To my knowledge, he's the first and probably the only one to do so thus far, though I may have just missed seeing it if someone else did to. I appreciate it.

edit: Mike Reed, not a TBM, also spoke up - thanks Mike!


I've been banned too.


Arg! That's sad. I appreciate you sticking up for me, but I'm sorry that it got you banned. I wasn't participating all that much on MAD in recent months, but did appreciate the ability to go post there from time to time. I guess we really don't perceive ourselves the way others perceive us, and I'm seeing that I really, really, really pissed off someone over at MAD, the way this has gone down. I'm freaking IP-banned now, too, so I can't even read the board anymore (without going out and using some proxy). Seriously, what did I do that got someone's goat so badly? I just don't see it, but then again, we never do.
Mormonism ceased being a compelling topic for me when I finally came to terms with its transformation from a personality cult into a combination of a real estate company, a SuperPac, and Westboro Baptist Church. - Kishkumen
_Mike Reed
_Emeritus
Posts: 983
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 7:28 pm

Post by _Mike Reed »

mbeesley wrote:
Mike Reed wrote:
Sethbag wrote:Also, thanks to LifeOnAPlate for sticking up for me over there after the banning. To my knowledge, he's the first and probably the only one to do so thus far, though I may have just missed seeing it if someone else did to. I appreciate it.

edit: Mike Reed, not a TBM, also spoke up - thanks Mike!


I've been banned too.
You said you were leaving voluntarily.

Right. But they didn't just let me walk away. They banned me and locked my account, preventing me from being able to access it in the future.
_mbeesley
_Emeritus
Posts: 74
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 10:51 pm

Post by _mbeesley »

Mike Reed wrote:
mbeesley wrote:
Mike Reed wrote:
Sethbag wrote:Also, thanks to LifeOnAPlate for sticking up for me over there after the banning. To my knowledge, he's the first and probably the only one to do so thus far, though I may have just missed seeing it if someone else did to. I appreciate it.

edit: Mike Reed, not a TBM, also spoke up - thanks Mike!


I've been banned too.
You said you were leaving voluntarily.

Right. But they didn't just let me walk away. They banned me and locked my account, preventing me from being able to access it in the future.

How do you know, since you said you were leaving? Better watch it, or Mr. Scratch will be calling you a liar. :D

Oh, and why do you care?
Cogito ergo sum.
_Mike Reed
_Emeritus
Posts: 983
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 7:28 pm

Post by _Mike Reed »

mbeesley wrote:
Mike Reed wrote:
mbeesley wrote:
Mike Reed wrote:
Sethbag wrote:Also, thanks to LifeOnAPlate for sticking up for me over there after the banning. To my knowledge, he's the first and probably the only one to do so thus far, though I may have just missed seeing it if someone else did to. I appreciate it.

edit: Mike Reed, not a TBM, also spoke up - thanks Mike!


I've been banned too.
You said you were leaving voluntarily.

Right. But they didn't just let me walk away. They banned me and locked my account, preventing me from being able to access it in the future.

How do you know, since you said you were leaving? Better watch it, or Mr. Scratch will be calling you a liar. :D


Liar? Whatever do you mean? I wanted to keep my account open so that I could access my contacts and old posts. Also, I explicitly stated, "I may come back later if the moderation lightens up... but for the moment, I think I could better spend my time elsewhere."

Oh, and why do you care?


Why do you care if I care?
Last edited by Hawkeye on Thu May 29, 2008 8:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

The problem is that MAD wants what MAD simply cannot have. MAD wants to be able to claim it confronts critics' accusations and soundly defeats them. MAD cannot have this because the church isn't true, and most of its truth claims are fairy tales. It's not that critics are smarter or better at debate - it's that the MAD believers are holding the wrong end of the stick.

Does anyone doubt, for one tiny minute, that if LDS truly felt like they were "winning" these debates they wouldn't be so frustrated??? In the early days of ZLMB, TBMs enjoyed the rough debate - but the vast majority of critics, at that time, were EVs from the Tanners' old board. As soon as the balance among critics shifted to secular critics, THEN the whining and frustrations started among the LDS, eventually resulting in the exodus and creation of FAIR.

They don't really want to completely exclude critics, because then they look like the cowards they've always accused RFM of being. They want critics, but they want to WIN the debates. Since they can't, they're doomed to continual frustration.

Frankly, I think it's hilarious.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_mbeesley
_Emeritus
Posts: 74
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 10:51 pm

Post by _mbeesley »

Mike Reed wrote:
mbeesley wrote:
Mike Reed wrote:
mbeesley wrote:
Mike Reed wrote:
Sethbag wrote:Also, thanks to LifeOnAPlate for sticking up for me over there after the banning. To my knowledge, he's the first and probably the only one to do so thus far, though I may have just missed seeing it if someone else did to. I appreciate it.

edit: Mike Reed, not a TBM, also spoke up - thanks Mike!


I've been banned too.
You said you were leaving voluntarily.

Right. But they didn't just let me walk away. They banned me and locked my account, preventing me from being able to access it in the future.

How do you know, since you said you were leaving? Better watch it, or Mr. Scratch will be calling you a liar. :D


Liar? Whatever do you mean?

Apparently, based on what I read in another thread, Nehor made an announcement here that he was going to be gone for X number days. But instead he as only gone X minus Y number of days. So Mr. Scratch basically called him a liar. That's what I meant.

I wanted to keep my account open so that I could access my contacts and old posts.

Well then, you have have simply and quietly slipped away without the annoucement. Kind of dumb to be poking the moderators in the eye if you wanted to maintain contact possibilities.

Oh, and why do you care?


Why do you care if I care?

Cause I'm a caring kind of guy. :)
Cogito ergo sum.
Post Reply