Mudcat wrote:I am an evangelical, and have noted there are several Ex-LDS on the board. My wife and her family are LDS and I have discussions with them from time to time about our differing faiths. One thing I note, is that there isn't a lot of stock put into the Bible....(its mistranslated, books missing, etc..) I am not saying they don't hold is Scripture, that would be a gross misrepresentation of their beliefs...but I do believe they see it much differently than I.
There are many, like myself who have a different opinion of the Bible.
Are there many ex-LDS who leave the church, because they no longer maintain LDS beliefs but yet maintain the belief that the Bible isn't credible in and of itself?
I have not been suprised by exLds responses though some of the responses made on this thread are interesting in their simple directness, I was suprised at the phrasing in this original question. I would have expected it to be... are there any exLDS who leave because they no longer maintain LDS belief but do maintain a belief in the Bible.
That would be the unusual situation. It is hardly represented here at all. I do know of a few people who have left LDS belief and followed some other form of Christian belief. They would have some substantial belief in the Bible. I may be an example but for myself after leaving LDS beliefs I spent a good number of years being skeptical of the Bible.
I really want to ask the obvious. How can one not have doubts about the Bible? Really Mudcat, it would be fair if in joining this discussion you would say why you would hold any view so strange as not to view the Bible with reservations.
I notice that many LDS view the idea of the Bible as the creation of human thougth imagination and experience as a picture in oppostition to the view that the Bible is the word of God. I can only think that the Bible can be a part of faith if these two poles are seen as unified. If they are not unified the human authorship with human limitations is overwhelmingly obvious and wins without much struggle.