MAsh wrote:Perhaps I should have said "interpretive" matters. What do we make of the multiple accounts of the FV? How do we understand polygamy? Where did Book of Mormon events take place? Are there official statements that clarify these issues? No.
No? I disagree, at least partly. We have official statements about polygamy, reams and reams of them. The others, not so many. And if there needed to be clarity on those issues, it would seem logical that it would be the Brethren who make appropriate declarations. I look forward to the day when your calling is announced in the
Church News and you will begin making these clarifying statements officially.
Therefore I have as much right to speculate as anyone else. They are speculative in the sense that we don't have clear answers.
Ah, then okay. Thanks for clearing that up. You definitely can speculate about those sorts of things all you want.
Let's add a few not discussed in this book: Should I vote Republican or Democrat? Should I follow a South Beach Diet or Atkins? Does the Church have a position? No. Can I speculate? You bet.
Immaterial, as they have nothing to do with the church.
Harmony, I've tried to answer your questions as forthrightly as I can, but I once again am reminded while I dislike message board interaction. I don't know if this was your intent, but you come across as very abrasive. I don't think I'm being hyper-sensitive here, but who knows. In order to avoid a discussion that becomes contentious, I hope you'll understand if I don't respond to all your questions.
Mike
Are pointed questions abrasive to you? Perhaps message board interaction really is not your thing then.
Thanks for the discussion. Good luck with your book.