Val Southwick: Why Utah leads the country in fraud schemes?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Rollo Tomasi
_Emeritus
Posts: 4085
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:27 pm

Val Southwick: Why Utah leads the country in fraud schemes?

Post by _Rollo Tomasi »

Below is a link to an article in the Trib about Val Southwick, an Ogden con man who fleeced investors of up to $180 million all the while flouting his LDS connections and worthiness (apparently Pres. Monson is a close family friend).

http://www.sltrib.com/ci_9587492
"Moving beyond apologist persuasion, LDS polemicists furiously (and often fraudulently) attack any non-traditional view of Mormonism. They don't mince words -- they mince the truth."

-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)
_John Larsen
_Emeritus
Posts: 1895
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:16 pm

Post by _John Larsen »

Here is the most telling passage:

Some members of the faith even supported Southwick when he was facing sentencing last week. Members of his ward, two former bishops and a former stake president wrote letters of support to the judge.
"In a particular church responsibility of mine over many years I observed with first-hand knowledge Val's Christ-like attributes in making other lives much better through his teaching, service and sharing of his means many times over," said one letter.


Even in the face of overwhelming evidence, members will still trust their "spiritual" feelings over self evident information. The fact that those in support include two bishops and a stake president should put an end to the idea that these fellows have a higher degree of spiritual discernment.
_SatanWasSetUp
_Emeritus
Posts: 1183
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:40 pm

Post by _SatanWasSetUp »

Hey, as long as he paid tithing on his "earnings" and didn't drink coffee, or watch R-rated movies, or wear a colored shirt while passing the sacrament he is morally clean. I am not aware of any official doctrine on scamming people out of money. How could the bishops and SPs know if his scams were wrong if there was no official letter from SLC on First Presidency letterhead?
"We of this Church do not rely on any man-made statement concerning the nature of Deity. Our knowledge comes directly from the personal experience of Joseph Smith." - Gordon B. Hinckley

"It's wrong to criticize leaders of the Mormon Church even if the criticism is true." - Dallin H. Oaks
_TAK
_Emeritus
Posts: 1555
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 4:47 pm

Post by _TAK »

On a personal level and through the interconnectedness of the LDS community, Southwick's standing in the church was solid as recently as last year. Thomas S. Monson, who today is the president of the church, presided over the marriage of the Southwick's son, John David, on March 21, when Monson was a counselor to the late church president Gordon B. Hinckley. Monson also met with the family before John David Southwick's mission in 2004.


Gee I wonder how much money he has money stolen from others and donated to the Church?
No doubt the Church will return it ..
_silentkid
_Emeritus
Posts: 1606
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 5:50 pm

Post by _silentkid »

SatanWasSetUp wrote:Hey, as long as he paid tithing on his "earnings" and didn't drink coffee, or watch R-rated movies, or wear a colored shirt while passing the sacrament he is morally clean. I am not aware of any official doctrine on scamming people out of money. How could the bishops and SPs know if his scams were wrong if there was no official letter from SLC on First Presidency letterhead?


I wonder how he answered the "are you honest in your dealings with your fellow man" temple recommend question, or is that not a question anymore? It amazes how much members put more stock in not drinking coffee than in swindling others out of their hard earned money. Their perspectives and priorities are all mixed up.
_rcrocket

Post by _rcrocket »

John Larsen wrote:Here is the most telling passage:

Some members of the faith even supported Southwick when he was facing sentencing last week. Members of his ward, two former bishops and a former stake president wrote letters of support to the judge.
"In a particular church responsibility of mine over many years I observed with first-hand knowledge Val's Christ-like attributes in making other lives much better through his teaching, service and sharing of his means many times over," said one letter.


Even in the face of overwhelming evidence, members will still trust their "spiritual" feelings over self evident information. The fact that those in support include two bishops and a stake president should put an end to the idea that these fellows have a higher degree of spiritual discernment.


Should friends not provide letters of support at sentencing hearings?

I've been asked to be a witness in the sentencing phase for a friend of mine who will likely be convicted of a heinous first degree murder. Should I not? What if I don't believe in the death penalty? Doesn't it seem to you that the Christian motif is to help even the convict in prison?
_John Larsen
_Emeritus
Posts: 1895
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:16 pm

Post by _John Larsen »

rcrocket wrote:
John Larsen wrote:Here is the most telling passage:

Some members of the faith even supported Southwick when he was facing sentencing last week. Members of his ward, two former bishops and a former stake president wrote letters of support to the judge.
"In a particular church responsibility of mine over many years I observed with first-hand knowledge Val's Christ-like attributes in making other lives much better through his teaching, service and sharing of his means many times over," said one letter.


Even in the face of overwhelming evidence, members will still trust their "spiritual" feelings over self evident information. The fact that those in support include two bishops and a stake president should put an end to the idea that these fellows have a higher degree of spiritual discernment.


Should friends not provide letters of support at sentencing hearings?

I've been asked to be a witness in the sentencing phase for a friend of mine who will likely be convicted of a heinous first degree murder. Should I not? What if I don't believe in the death penalty? Doesn't it seem to you that the Christian motif is to help even the convict in prison?


It depends on what a letter of support is and what their intent in writing it is. I am curious how the report found it is was two bishops and a stake president. I guess that is still a currency worth trading in. This guy is scum. Short of a heinous violent crime, this guy did the unthinkable. I don't know why anybody would want to show their support.
_TygerFang
_Emeritus
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 1:16 am

Post by _TygerFang »

John Larsen wrote:Here is the most telling passage:

Some members of the faith even supported Southwick when he was facing sentencing last week. Members of his ward, two former bishops and a former stake president wrote letters of support to the judge.
"In a particular church responsibility of mine over many years I observed with first-hand knowledge Val's Christ-like attributes in making other lives much better through his teaching, service and sharing of his means many times over," said one letter.


Even in the face of overwhelming evidence, members will still trust their "spiritual" feelings over self evident information. The fact that those in support include two bishops and a stake president should put an end to the idea that these fellows have a higher degree of spiritual discernment.

It's just amazing how much a person can ignore and deny isn't it. Especially where feelings and/or religion is involved.
_The Dude
_Emeritus
Posts: 2976
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:16 am

Post by _The Dude »

TygerFang wrote:It's just amazing how much a person can ignore and deny isn't it. Especially where feelings and/or religion is involved.


Reminds me of how Mark Hofmann's father said he had a spiritual witness that his son was innocent -- he was not the bomber behind the Salamander letter fiasco. Then a couple days later, Mark confessed. So much for that witness.
"And yet another little spot is smoothed out of the echo chamber wall..." Bond
_Jason Bourne
_Emeritus
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:00 pm

Post by _Jason Bourne »

This is another sad tale of Mormons being too trusting of other Mormons. We have had two similar situations in our stake in the past 20 years though not to this extent. LDS people are just too naïve when it comes to these things. I recall two people who came to me for advice after they put money into some mining LPs. They had blown up with IRS. Because of my background they hoped I could help them. I had an idea of their income level. I told them that they had no business investing in such high risk and tax aggressive investments based on their income. Well they came to me too late. I could not help them. They lost their money, had to pay IRS for back taxes plus penalties and interest. I was so furious but the person who sold them the deal, the good LDS member that everyone trusted, had long since moved away... and yes he had been prosecuted and had lost his license to practice as a CPA in the process.

If it sounds too good to be true it almost always is. Most investors should stick to investing in solid stock mutual funds from a reputable family of funds with a good historical track record. That is all most people will need. If they are not comfortable with asset allocation and selecting the funds there are lots of advisor's out there that are good and will help them for not a large fee typically. I always tell people if you do not understand how the investment vehicle works you have no business being in it.
Post Reply