John Tvedtnes: Foul-mouthed Hatchet Man?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_William Schryver
_Emeritus
Posts: 1671
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:58 pm

Post by _William Schryver »

Scottie wrote:
skippy the dead wrote:I would hope that these posts will be properly split off into the telestial kingdom each and every time they are made.


[The Terrestrial is not for the faint of heart. Will's comments, childish and offensive as they are, are allowed and will remain.]

Besides that, since (as you have previously noted) my comments are to be taken as typical of the "Mormon god," then we should guarantee as wide an audience as possible for them, in order that everyone here on the Island of Misfit Goys may have the opportunity to both hear and reject his word.
... every man walketh in his own way, and after the image of his own god, whose image is in the likeness of the world, and whose substance is that of an idol ...
_William Schryver
_Emeritus
Posts: 1671
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:58 pm

Post by _William Schryver »

Moniker wrote:
William Schryver wrote:He saith as he hastens to join the shameless circle again.

The choreography of your sordid dance is so well practiced now that it has become a proverb.


Skippy, this is my favorite one, I think -- a religious term (I actually had to look up the definition of proverb:) mixed in with the image of men in a circle masturbating while dancing (the hokey pokey??) is just loverly!

http://kids.niehs.nih.gov/lyrics/hokey.htm

Just in case you missed this important installment in the ongoing discussion:

http://mormondiscussions.com/discuss/vi ... 466#168466
... every man walketh in his own way, and after the image of his own god, whose image is in the likeness of the world, and whose substance is that of an idol ...
_Moniker
_Emeritus
Posts: 4004
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:53 pm

Post by _Moniker »

William Schryver wrote:
Moniker wrote:
William Schryver wrote:He saith as he hastens to join the shameless circle again.

The choreography of your sordid dance is so well practiced now that it has become a proverb.


Skippy, this is my favorite one, I think -- a religious term (I actually had to look up the definition of proverb:) mixed in with the image of men in a circle masturbating while dancing (the hokey pokey??) is just loverly!

http://kids.niehs.nih.gov/lyrics/hokey.htm

Just in case you missed this important installment in the ongoing discussion:

http://mormondiscussions.com/discuss/vi ... 466#168466


Oh, I missed that post. I just read it and am up to speed, thanks! Yet, there's no music and I think it really lacks the certain punch you could otherwise get from your posts since you don't include images or music. That's rather disappointing, really.

I perused the definitions and was so pleased none of them fit me. Not even the slut definition as I am impeccably dressed, at all times. Yay me!
_William Schryver
_Emeritus
Posts: 1671
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:58 pm

Post by _William Schryver »

Moniker wrote:
William Schryver wrote:
Moniker wrote:
William Schryver wrote:He saith as he hastens to join the shameless circle again.

The choreography of your sordid dance is so well practiced now that it has become a proverb.


Skippy, this is my favorite one, I think -- a religious term (I actually had to look up the definition of proverb:) mixed in with the image of men in a circle masturbating while dancing (the hokey pokey??) is just loverly!

http://kids.niehs.nih.gov/lyrics/hokey.htm

Just in case you missed this important installment in the ongoing discussion:

http://mormondiscussions.com/discuss/vi ... 466#168466


Oh, I missed that post. I just read it and am up to speed, thanks! Yet, there's no music and I think it really lacks the certain punch you could otherwise get from your posts since you don't include images or music. That's rather disappointing, really.

I perused the definitions and was so pleased none of them fit me. Not even the slut definition as I am impeccably dressed, at all times. Yay me!

You, as much as anyone I've encountered in this benighted ghetto of wonder and contradictions, do not belong.

I mean that as a compliment. You're a stranger in a strange land as you pirouette seemingly without a care through the trash-strewn alleyways of the GSTP, largely oblivious to the dirty deeds taking place in the dark shadows between the vapor lights, possessed of neither the obsession for vengeance nor the hunger for mockery. That, my dear, makes you a strange and welcome anomaly in these environs.

I extend my sincere wishes for a long and fruitful life.
... every man walketh in his own way, and after the image of his own god, whose image is in the likeness of the world, and whose substance is that of an idol ...
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Post by _Gadianton »

How I know about SHIELDS is none of your damn business really. Let's leave it at that.


So you are saying you have some kind of insider knowledge about Shields?
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.

LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
_cksalmon
_Emeritus
Posts: 1267
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 10:20 pm

Post by _cksalmon »

William Schryver wrote:
Moniker wrote:
William Schryver wrote:
Moniker wrote:
William Schryver wrote:He saith as he hastens to join the shameless circle again.

The choreography of your sordid dance is so well practiced now that it has become a proverb.


Skippy, this is my favorite one, I think -- a religious term (I actually had to look up the definition of proverb:) mixed in with the image of men in a circle masturbating while dancing (the hokey pokey??) is just loverly!

http://kids.niehs.nih.gov/lyrics/hokey.htm

Just in case you missed this important installment in the ongoing discussion:

http://mormondiscussions.com/discuss/vi ... 466#168466


Oh, I missed that post. I just read it and am up to speed, thanks! Yet, there's no music and I think it really lacks the certain punch you could otherwise get from your posts since you don't include images or music. That's rather disappointing, really.

I perused the definitions and was so pleased none of them fit me. Not even the slut definition as I am impeccably dressed, at all times. Yay me!

You, as much as anyone I've encountered in this benighted ghetto of wonder and contradictions, do not belong.

I mean that as a compliment. You're a stranger in a strange land as you pirouette seemingly without a care through the trash-strewn alleyways of the GSTP, largely oblivious to the dirty deeds taking place in the dark shadows between the vapor lights, possessed of neither the obsession for vengeance nor the hunger for mockery. That, my dear, makes you a strange and welcome anomaly in these environs.

I extend my sincere wishes for a long and fruitful life.


Every time you feed him with a (greedily-slurped up) response, he only grows stronger.

Not stronger in the sense that he has anything substantive to offer, but "stronger" in terms of his own radical sense of self-importance on this board.

Look at him coo over you, Moniker. Might he possibly find some neutral branch under which to hatch his vulgar eggs here?

Oh, how he hopes to do so.
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Post by _Gadianton »

I'm not mad at Will or even offended. I understand his anger. I understand, because I've taken some time to educate myself on apologetics, specifically the kind that stems from the school of Skinny-l. Will mentioned that he is friends with Louis Midgley, who is known for becoming angry very quickly. It's natural that Will would want to seem "cool" and impress the senior apologists with his own anger. I mean, look at how the Skinny-l crowd sent Tvedness into a blind rage, cussing obscenely at a Christian audience like he did as documented in this thread. No doubt this incident was known among those who promoted him to an associate at SHIELDS. Like I've said, apologetics is not the kind of thing you want to get involved with if peace and tranquility fall within the scope of your life goals.
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.

LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
_Yoda

Post by _Yoda »

Gadianton wrote:I'm not mad at Will or even offended. I understand his anger. I understand, because I've taken some time to educate myself on apologetics, specifically the kind that stems from the school of Skinny-l. Will mentioned that he is friends with Louis Midgley, who is known for becoming angry very quickly. It's natural that Will would want to seem "cool" and impress the senior apologists with his own anger. I mean, look at how the Skinny-l crowd sent Tvedness into a blind rage, cussing obscenely at a Christian audience like he did as documented in this thread. No doubt this incident was known among those who promoted him to an associate at SHIELDS. Like I've said, apologetics is not the kind of thing you want to get involved with if peace and tranquility fall within the scope of your life goals.


OK....What am I missing? Using the word, "bitch" instead of "whine", for effect is considered going into a "blind rage, cussing obscenely at a Christian audience"? Frankly, I think this observation is a little extreme.

Tvedness' word usage may have been a little overkill for his audience, and though I agree that it may have been unprofessional, I don't know that I would call it scandalous. He was frustrated. And he was participating in something that was volunteer, that he hadn't really initially even asked to be a part of, according to him. This was his quote:


Tvedness wrote:I assumed that you were dropping the discussion of the Tanners and Craig Ray's piece. about which I said NOT ONE WORD in my messages. (I even indicated that I had NOT been a part of the discussion.) Did you, in fact, actually READ my message, which dealt only with Joseph Smith's first vision? Or did you ignore it because you wanted to drop any and all issues?

I sent my message and the attachment (on the first visions of Joseph Smith and Paul) to the entire list to which you had sent information. Since you are disseminating misinformation to this group, I thought it would be appropriate for me to set the record straight to the same group.

I NEVER asked to be included in your e-mails on this or any other topic, but you put me on your list anyway. So please stop bitching about my message; it's damned hypocritical. Check out that beam before you try helping me get rid of my mote.

John Tvedtnes


Good grief! Who hasn't lost their cool on one of these message board discussions? Just because Tvedtnes is a BYU professor, should he be immune?

Frankly, I don't think that Scratch's post was character assassination at all. I rather admired how Tvedtness held his own.

At least Tvedtness had a genuine frustration which caused him to react. What's Will's excuse?

All he has done for the past couple of weeks is just pop in and do these "drive-by" insults just for the hell of it. He wouldn't dare talk the way he does here at MAD. He just uses this place as a dumping ground because he feels it is beneath him. He doesn't see a need to be polite, or conduct himself as an adult.
_cksalmon
_Emeritus
Posts: 1267
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 10:20 pm

Post by _cksalmon »

liz3564 wrote:What's Will's excuse?

All he has done for the past couple of weeks is just pop in and do these "drive-by" insults just for the hell of it. He wouldn't dare talk the way he does here at MAD. He just uses this place as a dumping ground because he feels it is beneath him. He doesn't see a need to be polite, or conduct himself as an adult.


Indeed.

Couple days ago Will's sig line here sported a much harsher quotation from me; something along the lines of "Isn't it about time that we started officially equating critics, a la Schryver, with those nasty 'faggots?'"

That MDB-only sig is now gone. He's now reverted here to his MADB sig quotation of me.

And, at the very same time, he started trying to defend his vulgarity here via whatever online dictionary he makes use of.

I suspect he probably got dinged by Mopologetical higher-ups for his wanton vulgarity and fell in line.

'Course I could be wrong.

I don't, in the least, suspect that he experienced a genuine case of conscience such that he realized his former MDB sig simply gave away too much of his personal mopologetic store.

He behaves here like an oozing snail.

Sort of cute, in the abstract, but you don't really want his slime trail on you.
_LifeOnaPlate
_Emeritus
Posts: 2799
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:50 pm

Post by _LifeOnaPlate »

Good grief. This just keeps getting dumber.
One moment in annihilation's waste,
one moment, of the well of life to taste-
The stars are setting and the caravan
starts for the dawn of nothing; Oh, make haste!

-Omar Khayaam

*Be on the lookout for the forthcoming album from Jiminy Finn and the Moneydiggers.*
Post Reply