Campaign to Reinstate Jersey as a Mod

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply

Should Jersey be reinstituted as a Mod?

 
Total votes: 0

_Alter Idem
_Emeritus
Posts: 784
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 7:24 pm

Post by _Alter Idem »

Jason Bourne wrote:82% to 17% for reinstatement. I have not read the thread but for hecks sake!! She did a fine job as a mod. Put her back. NOW Dang it all!


If it was only that easy. The problem we may be forgetting is that Shades stated that the posters who complained said they would leave the board if Jersey Girl was not removed. Unless they have changed their minds, I assume they will make good on their threats if Jersey Girl is reinstated. And from Shades' decision to give in to their demands, he or the other board owner(s) must see these posters as too valuable to take a chance in calling their bluff.

And yes, it's Shades' board and he can do as he pleases...so I guess if these anonymous posters(COWARDLY as well since they won't fess up--so cowardly they wouldn't even do it by using the option Shades offered them to post anonymously through him on this thread) who threatened to leave if Shades didn't remove her are that important to him, then I guess Jersey Girl is sacrificed.

I'm pretty sure I voiced my own concerns--on a public thread started by Mercury about Jersey Girl as a moderator, back when she was put in--because I knew her to be a passionate poster; but as far as I can see and even Shades has confirmed, she's done a great job as a moderator and it does seem unfair that Shades would allow the initial impression to be given that she was relieved because posters complained about her moderating, when in fact what actually happened was that a couple of posters with clout who don't like her, demanded she be removed or they would leave. in my opinion, she's got a right to be p.o.ed by the way this was handled.
_Mercury
_Emeritus
Posts: 5545
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 2:14 pm

Post by _Mercury »

Jersey Girl wrote:
Jason Bourne wrote:Sheeeesh!

This is now what, nine pages? And how long had it gone on. Could the good Dr make a big decision here and either put Jersey Girl back as a mod or not.


I can well understand your frustration however, I haven't had the time to complete my own replies/rebuttals/statements of fact and all of that sort of thing. I will get back to holding up my own end of the discussion as soon as time permits since there were additional points I planned to make here.

Edit: I apparently have started page 10 with the above post as I viewed it after posting. I also noticed there are 6,000+ views for this thread. Someone must be interested in the topic. I've just been very busy. I will do my best not to disappoint.


Jersey, You Would not shut up during the first umpteen pages of this thread. You spoke your piece. Then shades spoke and had his piece. We are done here.
And crawling on the planet's face
Some insects called the human race
Lost in time
And lost in space...and meaning
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Mercury wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:
Jason Bourne wrote:Sheeeesh!

This is now what, nine pages? And how long had it gone on. Could the good Dr make a big decision here and either put Jersey Girl back as a mod or not.


I can well understand your frustration however, I haven't had the time to complete my own replies/rebuttals/statements of fact and all of that sort of thing. I will get back to holding up my own end of the discussion as soon as time permits since there were additional points I planned to make here.

Edit: I apparently have started page 10 with the above post as I viewed it after posting. I also noticed there are 6,000+ views for this thread. Someone must be interested in the topic. I've just been very busy. I will do my best not to disappoint.


Jersey, You Would not shut up during the first umpteen pages of this thread. You spoke your piece. Then shades spoke and had his piece. We are done here.


Mercury,

With all due respect, I didn't create this thread, you did. I have posted on this thread because it names me in the OP and concerns a situation in which I was involved. If you describe that as "you would not shut up" then I would refer you to the numerous posters who have also chosen to participate and created 10 pages of dialogue here. I have not completed my replies and while you may be done, I am not so please don't presume to speak for me as when you say "We are done here".

It is naïve at best for one to open a thread and not expect people to post on it especially the one who is named in the OP. I'm sure you haven't checked the poll results lately but if you did, you would see that people are still voting. I don't know where all of these people are coming from but I, for one, appreciate the vote of confidence in me and if shutting me up is what you had in mind here, I wish you all the luck in the world with that.
Last edited by Google Feedfetcher on Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Alter Idem wrote:
Jason Bourne wrote:82% to 17% for reinstatement. I have not read the thread but for hecks sake!! She did a fine job as a mod. Put her back. NOW Dang it all!


If it was only that easy. The problem we may be forgetting is that Shades stated that the posters who complained said they would leave the board if Jersey Girl was not removed. Unless they have changed their minds, I assume they will make good on their threats if Jersey Girl is reinstated. And from Shades' decision to give in to their demands, he or the other board owner(s) must see these posters as too valuable to take a chance in calling their bluff.

And yes, it's Shades' board and he can do as he pleases...so I guess if these anonymous posters(COWARDLY as well since they won't fess up--so cowardly they wouldn't even do it by using the option Shades offered them to post anonymously through him on this thread) who threatened to leave if Shades didn't remove her are that important to him, then I guess Jersey Girl is sacrificed.

I'm pretty sure I voiced my own concerns--on a public thread started by Mercury about Jersey Girl as a moderator, back when she was put in--because I knew her to be a passionate poster; but as far as I can see and even Shades has confirmed, she's done a great job as a moderator and it does seem unfair that Shades would allow the initial impression to be given that she was relieved because posters complained about her moderating, when in fact what actually happened was that a couple of posters with clout who don't like her, demanded she be removed or they would leave. in my opinion, she's got a right to be p.o.ed by the way this was handled.


Alter,

I appreciate the insight and perceptiveness expressed in your post above. I plan to address some of the very issues that you raised. As I stated previously, I've been very busy but I'll get to it.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Alter Idem wrote:
Jason Bourne wrote:82% to 17% for reinstatement. I have not read the thread but for hecks sake!! She did a fine job as a mod. Put her back. NOW Dang it all!


If it was only that easy. The problem we may be forgetting is that Shades stated that the posters who complained said they would leave the board if Jersey Girl was not removed. Unless they have changed their minds, I assume they will make good on their threats if Jersey Girl is reinstated. And from Shades' decision to give in to their demands, he or the other board owner(s) must see these posters as too valuable to take a chance in calling their bluff.


And yes, it's Shades' board and he can do as he pleases...so I guess if these anonymous posters(COWARDLY as well since they won't fess up--so cowardly they wouldn't even do it by using the option Shades offered them to post anonymously through him on this thread) who threatened to leave if Shades didn't remove her are that important to him, then I guess Jersey Girl is sacrificed.

I'm pretty sure I voiced my own concerns--on a public thread started by Mercury about Jersey Girl as a moderator, back when she was put in--because I knew her to be a passionate poster; but as far as I can see and even Shades has confirmed, she's done a great job as a moderator and it does seem unfair that Shades would allow the initial impression to be given that she was relieved because posters complained about her moderating, when in fact what actually happened was that a couple of posters with clout who don't like her, demanded she be removed or they would leave. in my opinion, she's got a right to be p.o.ed by the way this was handled.


Okay, I've finally landed in one place and back onto this little hobby horse. See the part that I bolded, Alter? That's how I saw it from the beginning. Now think about it.

Poster with "clout" who didn't want me to "touch their posts" (Shades words, not mine) because why?

Is it because they thought I (or other mods for that matter) had some extraordinary power? To do what?

Delete the deletes, move thread to the Telestial and split threads? (I don't recall ever splitting a thread)?

To do the job that Shades gives his moderators? Isn't that what folks expect the mods to do?

I signed every mod action that I took. Anything that I did could easily be undone if it were deemed a bad call.

But Shades has already noted that I didn't act in error.

(Are you following this line of "reasoning"?)

Now back up the truck again.

Posters with clout to do what? Manipulate Shades?

Poster with clout who didn't want me to touch their posts, when Shades said I didn't act in error.

And so, they think that strong arming Shades is getting them somewhere, right?

Where does it get them? Here, take a look, I'll show you:

Remember that I didn't have power to do anything significant to start with and didn't err as a moderator.

I am left to assume that some people didn't approve the comments of Jersey Girl the poster (Shades indicated this in one of his posts on this thread) so they badgered Shades into removing me as moderator in order to...

make me a just a poster again.

Does that make any sort of sense to anyone ? I ask you, how detached from reality and so intellectually disabled are some people on this board?

I'm afraid we're gonna find out...because Jersey Girl the poster (the one they apparently didn't like) is still here and posting.

Yup, that's progress folks.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Post by _Jersey Girl »

It would be nice if someone tried responding to requests to fix the search feature so I don't have to flip and scan through various pages to find quotes like this:

Shades wrote: Just because she's no longer behind the wheel doesn't mean she can't ride in the car.



Behind what wheel, Shades? I wasn't behind any wheel. The posters who complain to you are driving the car here.

Is this the same board whose posters criticize MAD for giving special protection to Daniel Peterson?
Last edited by Google Feedfetcher on Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_cksalmon
_Emeritus
Posts: 1267
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 10:20 pm

Post by _cksalmon »

Jersey Girl wrote:
Alter Idem wrote:
Jason Bourne wrote:82% to 17% for reinstatement. I have not read the thread but for hecks sake!! She did a fine job as a mod. Put her back. NOW Dang it all!


If it was only that easy. The problem we may be forgetting is that Shades stated that the posters who complained said they would leave the board if Jersey Girl was not removed. Unless they have changed their minds, I assume they will make good on their threats if Jersey Girl is reinstated. And from Shades' decision to give in to their demands, he or the other board owner(s) must see these posters as too valuable to take a chance in calling their bluff.


And yes, it's Shades' board and he can do as he pleases...so I guess if these anonymous posters(COWARDLY as well since they won't fess up--so cowardly they wouldn't even do it by using the option Shades offered them to post anonymously through him on this thread) who threatened to leave if Shades didn't remove her are that important to him, then I guess Jersey Girl is sacrificed.

I'm pretty sure I voiced my own concerns--on a public thread started by Mercury about Jersey Girl as a moderator, back when she was put in--because I knew her to be a passionate poster; but as far as I can see and even Shades has confirmed, she's done a great job as a moderator and it does seem unfair that Shades would allow the initial impression to be given that she was relieved because posters complained about her moderating, when in fact what actually happened was that a couple of posters with clout who don't like her, demanded she be removed or they would leave. in my opinion, she's got a right to be p.o.ed by the way this was handled.


Okay, I've finally landed in one place and back onto this little hobby horse. See the part that I bolded, Alter? That's how I saw it from the beginning. Now think about it.

Poster with "clout" who didn't want me to "touch their posts" (Shades words, not mine) because why?

Is it because they thought I (or other mods for that matter) had some extraordinary power? To do what?

Delete the deletes, move thread to the Telestial and split threads? (I don't recall ever splitting a thread)?

To do the job that Shades gives his moderators? Isn't that what folks expect the mods to do?

I signed every mod action that I took. Anything that I did could easily be undone if it were deemed a bad call.

But Shades has already noted that I didn't act in error.

(Are you following this line of "reasoning"?)

Now back up the truck again.

Posters with clout to do what? Manipulate Shades?

Poster with clout who didn't want me to touch their posts, when Shades said I didn't act in error.

And so, they think that strong arming Shades is getting them somewhere, right?

Where does it get them? Here, take a look, I'll show you:

Remember that I didn't have power to do anything significant to start with and didn't err as a moderator.

I am left to assume that some people didn't approve the comments of Jersey Girl the poster (Shades indicated this in one of his posts on this thread) so they badgered Shades into removing me as moderator in order to...

make me a just a poster again.

Does that make any sort of sense to anyone ? I ask you, how detached from reality and so intellectually disabled are some people on this board?

I'm afraid we're gonna find out...because Jersey Girl the poster (the one they apparently didn't like) is still here and posting.

Yup, that's progress folks.


JG--

It's over. No right-thinking board participant thinks any less of you.

But, you're dying needlessly here like Magellan in his last futile stand against the pagans. Go on and finish the voyage--something he was unable to do, secondary to death.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Post by _Jersey Girl »

cksalmon wrote:JG--

It's over. No right-thinking board participant thinks any less of you.

But, you're dying needlessly here like Magellan in his last futile stand against the pagans. Go on and finish the voyage--something he was unable to do, secondary to death.


cks,

What is it that you think is over? I'm curious as to why you think I'm posting on this thread.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Let me make something clear to you and others, cks. My concern is not that people think less or more of me on this board. If you think I'm defending my integrity or something, you would be decidedly wrong in that regard. My integrity was and remains intact and while I appreciate those who commented and also voted here, I don't need their votes of confidence to affirm that that is so.

Again, I'd like to know just why you think I'm choosing to complete my responses here for I'm more than certain given your comments above that you have no earthly idea what is on my mind or what my intentions are. Please don't try to second guess me. I've found that in the past, those who attempt to do so are typically wrong.

I'm almost done by the way so not to worry. I wouldn't want to take time away from those who are overly invested in bickering about DCP ad nauseum in multiple other threads that are active at the current time.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_cksalmon
_Emeritus
Posts: 1267
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 10:20 pm

Post by _cksalmon »

Jersey Girl wrote:Let me make something clear to you and others, cks. My concern is not that people think less or more of me on this board. If you think I'm defending my integrity or something, you would be decidedly wrong in that regard. My integrity was and remains intact and while I appreciate those who commented and also voted here, I don't need their votes of confidence to affirm that that is so.

Again, I'd like to know just why you think I'm choosing to complete my responses here for I'm more than certain given your comments above that you have no earthly idea what is on my mind or what my intentions are. Please don't try to second guess me. I've found that in the past, those who attempt to do so are typically wrong.

I'm almost done by the way so not to worry. I wouldn't want to take time away from those who are overly invested in bickering about DCP ad nauseum in multiple other threads that are active at the current time.


True dat. I don't have a clue.

I'm just a guy reading a message board, who happens not to care whether or not Jersey Girl is a mod here. I like your posts regardless.

Obviously, I'm not as invested in the situation as are you, but, I'm just saying, I will continue to read your posts and I will continue to deem them important.

Color me disinterested.

Who on earth here cares that you are no longer a mod?

Who on earth actually wants to be a mod here?

At some point, one has to admit that System-X works in a certain way. And, one has to just deal with it.

I voted for you, Jersey Girl.

I'm not disgruntled.

I just don't see the point at this point.
Post Reply