asbestosman wrote:Many people I know find that swinging makes them gay. They even had a club down at BYU where students would hook up, swap partners, and even perfect their technique or learn some new moves. Some may felt that anal instructors are the best, but others determined that openness to alternative syles leads to participants who are much more gay than they would have been otherwise. Students who participate often find that they wish their friends and roommates were equally gay and thus give them a call while at that club and invite them to come out too.
This juvenile crap was not funny when Will was doing it. You've just lost a bit of dignity in my estimation, but then I don't suppose anyone here really cares.
asbestosman wrote:Many people I know find that swinging makes them gay. They even had a club down at BYU where students would hook up, swap partners, and even perfect their technique or learn some new moves. Some may felt that anal instructors are the best, but others determined that openness to alternative syles leads to participants who are much more gay than they would have been otherwise. Students who participate often find that they wish their friends and roommates were equally gay and thus give them a call while at that club and invite them to come out too.
This juvenile crap was not funny when Will was doing it. You've just lost a bit of dignity in my estimation, but then I don't suppose anyone here really cares.
You know, virtually every LDS poster on these boards has been told that in the last week. Must be a plot of some kind.....is it ours.....or theirs?????????
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics "I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
This juvenile crap was not funny when Will was doing it. You've just lost a bit of dignity in my estimation, but then I don't suppose anyone here really cares.
I just couldn't figure out if he was serious or joking. Was it a joke? Whatever it was, yuck.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.
The Nehor wrote:You know, virtually every LDS poster on these boards has been told that in the last week. Must be a plot of some kind.....is it ours.....or theirs?????????
Yeah, I know. You guys think this is all hysterically funny. Whatever. Crude sexual double-entendres are usually the stock in trade of R-rated teen sex flicks. If that's where you want to go, have at it. Just don't expect me to go along.
This juvenile crap was not funny when Will was doing it. You've just lost a bit of dignity in my estimation, but then I don't suppose anyone here really cares.
I just couldn't figure out if he was serious or joking. Was it a joke? Whatever it was, yuck.
I think it must be abman's way of showing that he is a worthy priesthood holder who does not associate with apostates, and who zealously avoids the appearance of evil.
Never mind. Anything that puts the lurkers off letting the missionaries through the front door ...
This juvenile crap was not funny when Will was doing it. You've just lost a bit of dignity in my estimation, but then I don't suppose anyone here really cares.
I just couldn't figure out if he was serious or joking. Was it a joke? Whatever it was, yuck.
Of course it was a joke. Here's the premise:
Will uses language that is normally extraordinarily vulgar slang used to describe sexual and scatalogical functions. People understand what he's doing and object to it, whereupon Will chortles to himself and proclaims his innocence. Meanwhile, Nehor and asbestosman, finding all this hilarious, proceed to copy Will's behavior.
It wasn't funny the first time. And Will's an idiot.
Last edited by cacheman on Thu Jul 03, 2008 8:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Nehor wrote:You know, virtually every LDS poster on these boards has been told that in the last week. Must be a plot of some kind.....is it ours.....or theirs?????????
Both?
I take responsibility for what I did. I am, in fact, juvenile and I do suspect that nobody here cares.
To be serious again, I was hoping that my silly behavior on this thread might make the point to Will that hiding insults in double-entendres isn't some sort of free-pass for assinine behavior. Did I go about it the wrong way? Apparently. It's not that I really like the idea of being a textual mirror as a principle--I cannot blame Will for my actions. My intention was not to actually insult of offend, but merely to demonstrate how easy it is to do so knowing fully well that your audience will likely interpret what you write as vulgar even though you wrote it in such a way that you could claim it was innocent and indeed, you may have only written it with the innocent interpretation in mind. The thing that makes one culpable, I think, is that you know full well that your audience will "misinterpret" what you wrote and did nothing to clarify the proper interpretation for them. They are therefore justified in taking umbrage at you.
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy. eritis sicut dii I support NCMO
Runtu wrote:People understand what he's doing and object to it, whereupon Will chortles to himself and proclaims his innocence. Meanwhile, Nehor and asbestosman, finding all this hilarious, proceed to copy Will's behavior.
Close, but no green jello.
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy. eritis sicut dii I support NCMO
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics "I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo