Double Standard--Question for Will, et. al. from MAD

[_asbestosman]

I never intended to actually offend anyone or expected anyone would actually be offended as I felt that the "innocent" meaning was obvious, so I do regret that--not that it absolves me of guilt.

Double-entendre insults: so simple even a caveman (or an asbestosman) could do it.

[_cksalmon]

I never intended to actually offend anyone or expected anyone would actually be offended as I felt that the "innocent" meaning was obvious, so I do regret that--not that it absolves me of guilt.

Double-entendre insults: so simple even a caveman (or an asbestosman) could do it.

I couldn't tell what you were up to, either, Ab; but I couldn't bring myself to believe it was sinister.

I believe Schryver is probably incorrigible.

Chris

[_Runtu]

I never intended to actually offend anyone or expected anyone would actually be offended as I felt that the "innocent" meaning was obvious, so I do regret that--not that it absolves me of guilt.

Double-entendre insults: so simple even a caveman (or an asbestosman) could do it.

I couldn't tell what you were up to, either, Ab; but I couldn't bring myself to believe it was sinister.

I believe Schryver is probably incorrigible.

Chris

abman, if I misjudged your intent, I'm sorry.

And yes, Will is incorrigible. And an idiot. :)

[_The Nehor]

When did I copy Will?

In your mocking dismissal of my objections.

That was vulgar?

[_Runtu]

When did I copy Will?

In your mocking dismissal of my objections.

That was vulgar?

Nope, just a copy of Will's mocking dismissals. Unkind, yes. Vulgar, no.

[_The Nehor]

I also happen to know that these particular friends are acutely conscious of the semantic distinctions between a circle jerk as an activity engaged in by adolescent boys (it has nothing to do with homosexuals, contra cksalmon’s frequent misrepresentations thereof) and a circle jerk as "a pompous, self-congratulatory discussion."

"By the way, I for one am quite confident that most of you losers here in the Trailer Park are shameless buggerers. Else why your proclivity for the orgiastic circle jerks in which you all enthusiastically participate? Like this thread, for example. Graham tosses out the biscuit, and you're all in a circle on a moment's notice."

What threads do these come from? Sound like fun reads.

[_Runtu]

What threads do these come from? Sound like fun reads.

And he wonders why he's losing respect from others ...

[_Yong Xi]

What makes it so bad is that he himself revealed theim [FARMS] for what they are

Sigh.

On balance, I think this place is unsalvageable.

Have you tried talking to our parents?

[_cksalmon]

I also happen to know that these particular friends are acutely conscious of the semantic distinctions between a circle jerk as an activity engaged in by adolescent boys (it has nothing to do with homosexuals, contra cksalmon’s frequent misrepresentations thereof) and a circle jerk as "a pompous, self-congratulatory discussion."

"By the way, I for one am quite confident that most of you losers here in the Trailer Park are shameless buggerers. Else why your proclivity for the orgiastic circle jerks in which you all enthusiastically participate? Like this thread, for example. Graham tosses out the biscuit, and you're all in a circle on a moment's notice."

What threads do these come from? Sound like fun reads.

The first is from this very thread, a few pages back. The second is culled from KG's earlier KEP/Pundit thread.

Knock yourself out.

[_The Nehor]

What threads do these come from? Sound like fun reads.

And he wonders why he's losing respect from others ...

I'm actually thinking about doing a short case study on Will and am considering doing a side by side between him and some of the most vulgar critics to show the disparity that I think is there.