You want to mesh extreme conservatism with the Gospel and force the fit no matter how many scriptures you have to ignore. Is your religion primarily useful only as a bulwark for your political views? If so, that can be incredibly dangerous.
1. This makes my call for some definitions from you twofold: first, define the term "rich', and second, the term "extreme" as you've applied it to what you term (and I'm at all sure, at this juncture, that you really have a substantive understanding of the term) "conservatism".
2. For each and every scripture you can produce in which you can claim a clear condemnation of what you term "capitalism", I can and will produce (and have previously), another that clearly indicates a free market capitalist system is perfectly compatible with a Gospel oriented society. Perhaps not Zion, as you apparently are using the term, but Zion, in the context of the building up of Jackson County Missouri in preparation for the Second Coming involves, for all intents and purposes, the secession of the faithful LDS world from the common culture: a clean break from Babylon into our own "counterculture" (if I may use that term).
We are not at that point yet, and the Brethren have not ever, in my lifetime, or that of my parents (in essence, the 20the century) produced any body of teaching that could possibly be interpreted as being anti-capitalist. Indeed, during my lifetime, all I have seen is complete acceptance of that system as desirable and superior to any other historically known system.
Once the secession occurs, and the Saints move to separate themselves much more drastically from the world, then yes, that system will be much more communitarian, and what we now know as capitalism will be superseded by a system designed to accomplish whatever it is the Lord wishes to accomplish (unity and oneness within the enclaves of Gospel culture called "Zion").
However, no present or past system of socialistic, communitarian economics has ever been anything but a failure, on the more benign side, by stagnating economic growth and prosperity, and, as socialistic principles are pushed to there logical conclusion, involving catastrophic human costs.
Capitalism is, has the old cliché goes, the worst system there is - except for all the others.
At the end of the day, my position as a conservative/libertarian Latter Day Saint is this: When the Brethren, through the revelations of Jesus Christ, found, and organize the political, economic, and social order of Zion in an official manner (as a literal secession from the surrounding society; actually establishing the United Order), then I'll be right with them. That's my caveat: only under the principles of the Priesthood and mediated by the Holy Spirit, can a communitarian system ever be made to function and actually bless a people. The revelations actually seem to indicate that Zion will be both prosperous and economically effective (there will be no rich
and no poor, indicating general modest affluence for all, even though the extreme poles created by an economic free society between extreme poverty and vast wealth will be moderated toward a general average. There is no evidence in the D&C that there will be any attempt to create a classless society (as this would, of necessity involve the wholesale abrogation of free agency, perhaps the core value in the Gospel), but to narrow the large disparate extremes).
Until then, based upon economic history, logic, the laws and principles of economics, the modern historic teachings of the Brethren, and the Constitution which the Church claims is inspired, I will defend a free economic order and private property rights as what they are: the basis for all the other unalienable rights we enjoy (he who controls what you can make, how you can spend it, and the disposition of your property, controls you: you are his slave).
A number of Church authorities, most notably Marion Romney and Ezra Bensen, have made clear that the United Order is not Socialism.
My position is clear: no form of communitarianism created by human beings, without divine guidance and through Priesthood authority, is going to be anything but a failure, and history tells us that the greater tghe degree of brotherhood and unity desired, the greater and more barbaric the evils that must be perpetrated to accomplish it.
I await the United Order with baited breath. It will be interesting to see and experience what a United Order will look like, not in Enoch's day, or in Joseph's but in the 21st century. Left wing Mormons hoping against hope that the United Order is going to vindicate traditional ideological notions of socialist economic and social organization are going to be profoundly disappointed. At the same time, Mormons who cannot make the transition from conservative/libertarian principles as the Lord accepts and allows now, and expect Zion to simply recreate a pure libertarian kind of economy, but without bad people around to give it a bad name, are also in for a disappointment.
One thing is apparent. If Zion is to have "no poor", it will have to be prosperous, and no socialist system can possible produce this kind of wealth. Socialism is a system for the ruling classes; it enriches the state and its dependents, but not the masses of people who need free flowing wealth in the private sector to create the further wealth needed to fund and fill the Bishop's storehouse. In other words, the Bishop's storehouse needs a golden goose. Kill the goose, and you kill the Bishop's storehouse.
Therefore, I conclude that there will be a free market order within Zion, but it will be mediated by a Gospel system in which vast quantities of wealth will not accrue to single individuals. I don't see any reason that this would apply to companies, who would need the wealth to create gainful employment, but not to individuals. I foresee a system, quite unlike the secular welfare state (socialism as commonly understood) in which the poor and indigent are working and learning trades, engaging in agriculture, and contributing to the community as they are allowed, from the Bishop's storehouse, to exist above subsistence, in a dignified manner.
Now Nehor, we're back to an original question: is the purpose of such a welfare system to keep theses poor in Zion poor on a permanent basis, or to move them into self sufficiency that they may contribute to the storehouse rather that take from in perpetuity? I don't know what the Lord's plan is, or what conditions will be like then, but the present welfare system and Church teaching would seem to indicate the latter.
One thing is certain, and beyond dispute: all the contributions to the Bishop's storehouse will be voluntary and of our free will, and our unity will be one of free, unique individuals united in the cause of preparation for the second coming, each using his time, talents, and God given gifts to build that community, and this, above all, separates Zion from any human understanding of socialism or Utopian collectivism (all attempts at really "utopian collectivism" of which we are aware, most in this century, made the last century the greatest cornucopia of death and destruction in all human history).
Unity, yes. But, where there is one fact, there is another above it, and where there is one thing, another exists above that, and where there is one intelligence, there is another above that, and a greater one above that still. The Gospel teaches us that the universe is ultimately hierarchal, and encompasses a vast plethora of levels, degrees, and points of development in everything. Yet we require unity within our individuality to resist the world and redeem ourselves.
How the inherent and eternal tension between quality and equality, the individual and the group, will ultimately be reconciled in Zion, it will not be through any of the means or concepts expressed here by those who defend traditional concepts of socialism.