Force for good: Impact the church has made?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Post by _The Nehor »

It was instrumental in the creation of me. The world will never be the same.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_guy sajer
_Emeritus
Posts: 1372
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:16 am

Post by _guy sajer »

Jason Bourne wrote:
Not to be too technical, but in social science research, 'impact' is typically taken to imply a counterfactual--what would have happened in the absence of an intervention.

My guess is that in the absence of Mormonism, these same people would have been equally productive and happy in other religions, or they would be equally happy and productive without any religion. Add to this, the number of people made materially worse off due to their association with Mormonism, who might well have been happier without it, and I don't see much of a prospect that Mormonism's impact on the world has been significant in the least.

Mormonism won't survive indefinitely. It will go the way of most other small, insignificant, trivial, religions. When the history of the world is written a millennia from now, Mormonism won't even merit a footnote.


I disagree. It will not go away as long as there is religion, nor will it be small and insignificant. There are almost as many Mormons as Jews and in a way active Mormons almost become a cultural identity. Next studies state the Mormonism will grow and become much larger. Stark's number seem way off and are even higher than the Church predicts for itself. But 100 years from now there will be 50-65 million Mormons given current growth rates and assuming those hold and nothing happens to implode the Church.


I won't be alive 100 years from now, but if I were, I'd take that bet.

But who actually knows? You might be right, although I think that the 50-65 million is a bit far fetched.
God . . . "who mouths morals to other people and has none himself; who frowns upon crimes, yet commits them all; who created man without invitation, . . . and finally, with altogether divine obtuseness, invites this poor, abused slave to worship him ..."
_Runtu
_Emeritus
Posts: 16721
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 5:06 am

Post by _Runtu »

Jason Bourne wrote:Many non Mormons in Utah have a low opinion of Mormons. Part of it is being in the minority. I am skeptical that you would find such low opinions else where. Most people just do not know a whole lot about the Church.


I was talking about people in Texas, not in Utah. I really haven't spoken to a lot of nonmembers here.
Runtu's Rincón

If you just talk, I find that your mouth comes out with stuff. -- Karl Pilkington
_Jason Bourne
_Emeritus
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:00 pm

Post by _Jason Bourne »

Runtu wrote:
Jason Bourne wrote:Many non Mormons in Utah have a low opinion of Mormons. Part of it is being in the minority. I am skeptical that you would find such low opinions else where. Most people just do not know a whole lot about the Church.


I was talking about people in Texas, not in Utah. I really haven't spoken to a lot of nonmembers here.


I stand corrected.
_truth dancer
_Emeritus
Posts: 4792
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:40 pm

Post by _truth dancer »

Hi Jason,

I disagree. It will not go away as long as there is religion, nor will it be small and insignificant. There are almost as many Mormons as Jews and in a way active Mormons almost become a cultural identity. Next studies state the Mormonism will grow and become much larger. Stark's number seem way off and are even higher than the Church predicts for itself. But 100 years from now there will be 50-65 million Mormons given current growth rates and assuming those hold and nothing happens to implode the Church.


I read, (I can't remember exactly where, maybe Collapse by Jared Diamond), that the rise and fall of an organization/religion is roughly a bell curve. In other words, however long it took to rise to its peak is approximately how long it will take to decline.

Given that the LDS church in my opinion, reached its peak a few decades ago, I think its decline will take about 150 years.

Maybe sooner, given how information is so easily accessible these days and how many religious myths will be even more difficult to believe and accept as truth.

Moreover, I have a sense the more the LDS church holds to its 1940 look and feel, the less it will seem mainstream in the future.

Could be wrong though... :-)

~dancer~
"The search for reality is the most dangerous of all undertakings for it destroys the world in which you live." Nisargadatta Maharaj
_Jason Bourne
_Emeritus
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:00 pm

Post by _Jason Bourne »

I read, (I can't remember exactly where, maybe Collapse by Jared Diamond), that the rise and fall of an organization/religion is roughly a bell curve. In other words, however long it took to rise to its peak is approximately how long it will take to decline.

Given that the LDS church in my opinion, reached its peak a few decades ago, I think its decline will take about 150 years.

Maybe sooner, given how information is so easily accessible these days and how many religious myths will be even more difficult to believe and accept as truth.

Moreover, I have a sense the more the LDS church holds to its 1940 look and feel, the less it will seem mainstream in the future.

Could be wrong though... :-)


Who knows. I know the Church projects about 65 million members in 80 or so years and plans for that.

But not all organizations decline. The Catholic Church seems to thrive. Islam is certainly not on the declined. Even the LDS Church is still growing. If it is a bell curve for the Church and it really has hit its peak then it would not be growing at all.

Well one thing is for sure, none of us will be here in 80 years to see.

Bummer.
_krose
_Emeritus
Posts: 2555
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:18 pm

Post by _krose »

Is the church's growth rate keeping up with world population growth?
"The DNA of fictional populations appears to be the most susceptible to extinction." - Simon Southerton
Post Reply