Creator of Mormon Mishie Calendar busted ....

Post by **_JonasS** » Sat Jul 12, 2008 8:13 pm

Were they really missionaries, or RMs?

I think it's not bad if they are RMs, but current Missionaries and that sorta stuff is not good.

Post by **_Mahonri** » Sat Jul 12, 2008 11:51 pm

Per the Bishop involved in this whole foolishness: "I prefer not to say anything else about it," he said. "There is more involved, and he and I will have our meeting."

Nice going guy, innuendo to make him look bad. Really helps all knowing your attitude before this 'brother' comes before you to be judged, you prejudiced MoronicPriesthoodMoron.

Post by **_harmony** » Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:16 am

Mahonri wrote:Per the Bishop involved in this whole foolishness: "I prefer not to say anything else about it," he said. "There is more involved, and he and I will have our meeting."

Nice going guy, innuendo to make him look bad. Really helps all knowing your attitude before this 'brother' comes before you to be judged, you prejudiced MoronicPriesthoodMoron.

Well, what's he going to say? His hands are tied by the church; he can't say anything. They'll meet, they'll talk, they'll reach a decision... and guess what? Life will go on.

The church only has as much as the members give it; that's the beauty and the power of the vote. If Chad gives his bishop the power to call him into his office for a chat, then Chad must live with the consequences. If he does not give his bishop that power, then the bishop can't touch him. Of course, it all depends on how much the bishop wants to push it.

And why does this smell like BKP on the rampage again?

Post by **_harmony** » Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:25 am

Hmmm.. Smac says this calendar is "smut".

Post by **_Jersey Girl** » Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:07 am

Scottie wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:You know I read about this last night on TMZ. My thought is that this community should show the church what free speech is about and publish an "Anonymous Hunks of MDB" calendar in response.

It seems that this calendar has been out forever, did the church just now become aware of it?

Oooo!! Ooo!!! Can I be Mr September???

Well, Scottie. I'm afraid there's quite a rigorous screening process involved. If your avatar is anything like the real thing, it doesn't look at all promising. Would you consider applying for the "Captives of the Goddess Suite" pocket calendar?

;-)

Post by **_Scottie** » Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:15 am

Jersey Girl wrote:Well, Scottie. I'm afraid there's quite a rigorous screening process involved. If your avatar is anything like the real thing, it doesn't look at all promising. Would you consider applying for the "Captives of the Goddess Suite" pocket calendar?

;-)

Have you never seen Ned Flanders shirtless?? He'd...errr..I'd put those Mishies on that calendar to SHAME!!!

Post by **_Jersey Girl** » Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:22 am

Scottie wrote:Have you never seen Ned Flanders shirtless?? He'd...errr..I'd put those Mishies on that calendar to SHAME!!!

Ummm...the shirtlessness wasn't the issue, Scottie. Thus the pocket size calendar.

;-)

Post by **_Scottie** » Sun Jul 13, 2008 3:35 am

Jersey Girl wrote:Ummm...the shirtlessness wasn't the issue, Scottie. Thus the pocket size calendar.

;-)

ROFL....point taken.

Post by **_Boaz & Lidia** » Sun Jul 13, 2008 5:34 am

I am sure their t-shirts will get them in hot water, especially since LDS Inc cannot rid themselves of the stench of polygamy:

In a way that is a bland Polygamy Porter design, as the have six wives on their six pack..

or even this one:

Post by **_Scottie** » Sun Jul 13, 2008 5:37 am

LOL

I love the outline of the unborn baby.