Kamenraider's Posting Privileges Revoked At MADB!

[_beastie]

I knew the mod dealing with that thread was none other than Juliann.

I thought it was standard internet board etiquette that if a moderator was involved in a thread, that same moderator should NOT act as moderator in that thread.

Now I'm wondering if, when Juliann insisted not long ago that she was not a moderator, was she lying for the Lord, or just lying for Juliann?

Some of the folks over there know better, and ought to be embarrassed to be associated with such shenanigans.

[_kamenraider]

I'm so glad you had the foresight to do a screen capture of that post before it was deleted. I can't believe the dumb b*tch forgot to sign out of her mod account before posting! Priceless! LOL

Actually it was Cinepro that did the screen capture -- thanks Cinepro!

[_antishock8]

I knew the mod dealing with that thread was none other than Juliann.

I thought it was standard internet board etiquette that if a moderator was involved in a thread, that same moderator should NOT act as moderator in that thread.

Now I'm wondering if, when Juliann insisted not long ago that she was not a moderator, was she lying for the Lord, or just lying for Juliann?

Some of the folks over there know better, and ought to be embarrassed to be associated with such shenanigans.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ok85BmPyl_I

[_bcspace]

Sex and charity and the "love of Christ".

All these guys who are hoping for the day, fantasizing as they post are too excited about the future to see the practice/doctrine for what it is, a sick perversion of a relationship; an animalistic mating practice for powerful males to obtain/own women and girls for their sexual pleasure. A practice that even their scriptures clearly state will break the hearts of their wives and daughters. They don't care. They could care less about their wives, daughters, or their relationships.

Neither of you seem to know much about sex. It's quite unlikely to the be the purpose of plural marriage since it is more easily had without it.

[_truth dancer]

Neither of you seem to know much about sex. It's quite unlikely to the be the purpose of plural marriage since it is more easily had without it.

So, these guys can have sex in heaven without being "married" to their wives? Really? Is this another one of your doctrines? ;-)


~dancer~

[_bcspace]

Neither of you seem to know much about sex. It's quite unlikely to the be the purpose of plural marriage since it is more easily had without it.

So, these guys can have sex in heaven without being "married" to their wives? Really? Is this another one of your doctrines?

When are you going to stop beating your children?

When truth dancer is checkmated, she invents a conclusion. An evangelical trait.....

[_truth dancer]

Neither of you seem to know much about sex. It's quite unlikely to the be the purpose of plural marriage since it is more easily had without it.

So, these guys can have sex in heaven without being "married" to their wives? Really? Is this another one of your doctrines?

When are you going to stop beating your children?

When truth dancer is checkmated, she invents a conclusion. An evangelical trait.....

OK, maybe I missed something. Could you please be more clear? Did I get all your "its" mixed up?

It sounds to me like you are suggesting men in heaven can have sex more easily without being married?

If not this then what are you talking about? I have no idea what your checkmate is or what conclusion you think I drew, or what eveangelical trait you are discussing.

Hmmm... maybe I am too tired to figure out what you are talking about.

[_bcspace]

OK, maybe I missed something. Could you please be more clear? Did I get all your "its" mixed up?

So is establishing a plural marriage society for the purpose of getting sex an unnecessary complication?

Hmmm... maybe I am too tired to figure out what you are talking about.

I'm quite certain you know exactly what I am talking about.

[_truth dancer]

OK, maybe I missed something. Could you please be more clear? Did I get all your "its" mixed up?

So is establishing a plural marriage society for the purpose of getting sex an unnecessary complication?

Hmmm... maybe I am too tired to figure out what you are talking about.

I'm quite certain you know exactly what I am talking about.

No to be honest I am totally lost.

I have no idea what you are getting at....

Is establighing a plural marriage society for the purpose of getting sex an unnecessary complication? No, it is a "good" excuse to make one's affairs seem legit. Again, are you suggesting a guy can have sex in the CKHL without being sealed?

I suppose your God could do whatever he wanted, but then again, everything from baptism to the endowment would be considered an unnecessary complication.

What am I missing?

I think I will go to bed and see if I can make sense of it tomorrow. :-)

[_bcspace]

What am I missing?

That it's easier to get sex without having to resort to plural marriage. Therefore, sex is an unlikely reason for establishing plural marriage. Of course you know this, but being a truth dancer.....