Our leaders

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Nevo
_Emeritus
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 4:05 pm

Post by _Nevo »

truth dancer wrote:Are you suggesting Joseph Smith actually DID find lost or hidden objects with his seer stone?

I'm not sure how one would acquire "an established reputation as a gifted seer" (as Marquardt and Walters put it) without ever having anything to show for it. Joseph stated at his 1826 trial that he had "frequently ascertained . . . where lost property was" using his seer stone. And there is at least one account of him doing just that.

"E.W. Vanderhoof remembered that his Dutch grandfather once paid young Smith 75 cents to look into his stone to locate a stolen mare. The grandfather soon 'recovered his beast, which Joe said was somewhere on the lake shore and [was] about to be run over to Canada'" (D. Michael Quinn, Early Mormonism and the Magic World View, 2d ed., 43; Dan Vogel, Early Mormon Documents, 4:239-240).

Josiah Stowell testified that Joseph, looking in his stone, was able to describe in detail his house and outbuildings--even describing a tree with a "man's hand" painted on it--without having ever set foot on Stowell's property.

Martin Harris described Joseph using his seer stone to find a tie pin that Harris had accidentally dropped into a pile of straw and wood shavings.

As Dan Vogel observes, "these proofs separate Smith from the group of self-deluded treasure seers, for they were either true demonstrations of his seeric gift or evidence of his talent for deception" (Vogel, Joseph Smith: The Making of a Prophet, 43). Since Vogel's worldview does not admit the supernatural, he rejects the former explanation out of hand. I, however, prefer to keep an open mind :)
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

Nevo,

Does it ever bother you that defending your religion requires you to keep an open mind about magic stones?
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_Nevo
_Emeritus
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 4:05 pm

Post by _Nevo »

beastie wrote:Nevo,

Does it ever bother you that defending your religion requires you to keep an open mind about magic stones?

It doesn't require me to keep an open mind about "magic stones." It requires that I be open to the possibility that Joseph actually had visions (a "seeric gift"), that he didn't simply make everything up.
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: Our leaders

Post by _The Nehor »

harmony wrote:Our leaders today are so different from the flamboyant, outgoing, doctrine-creating leaders of the past. I'm wondering... which leaders today do you think would have been leaders in the beginning? Can you see Pres Monson sneaking around with Joseph, gathering plural wives behind Emma's back? Can you see Elder Oaks smashing a printing press, because it was printing the truth? Can you see Elder Scott standing in conference and laying plural marriage out for everyone to see and telling them to like it or leave?

Why were our early leaders not men of minimal integrity, while our leaders now for the most part show very high personal integrity? (I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt on the money thing, for the purposes of this discussion.) Is this a process where the scoundrels gave it a start, and the men with integrity moved them aside and stepped into the leadership positions? Or did the early Saints want scoundrels for leaders for some reason, while the current Saints want a higher standard?


Harmony, you do a lot of railing against the leadership of the Church to now say they show very high personal integrity.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

It doesn't require me to keep an open mind about "magic stones." It requires that I be open to the possibility that Joseph actually had visions (a "seeric gift"), that he didn't simply make everything up.


Semantics. You have to keep an open mind that - outside of his prophetic calling - Joseph Smith was able to look in a stone and see buried treasures. That's a magic stone.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Post by _The Nehor »

beastie wrote:Nevo,

Does it ever bother you that defending your religion requires you to keep an open mind about magic stones?


What's wrong with magic stones?
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

What's wrong with magic stones?


If you're determined to believe in Mormonism, there better be nothing wrong with magic stones.

For the rest of the world, they're about on par with crystal balls and telephone psychics.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Post by _The Nehor »

beastie wrote:
What's wrong with magic stones?


If you're determined to believe in Mormonism, there better be nothing wrong with magic stones.

For the rest of the world, they're about on par with crystal balls and telephone psychics.


Not quite, one reveals harsh truths to the reader, demands action, and shares the message of this G.I. Joe public service announcement: http://youtube.com/watch?v=DpZKDr5GOWs

"Hey Guys, ah you know it's funny. These people they go to sleep. They think everything's fine, everything's good. They wake up the next day and they're on fire.

The other generally spouts off rubbish about how everything is going to get better and then they wind up obese, alone, collecting disability checks while watching Oprah. Then they wake up the next day and they're on fire.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_Droopy
_Emeritus
Posts: 9826
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 4:06 pm

Post by _Droopy »

Boaz & Lidia wrote:
Droopy wrote:I don't have a need to believe when I know...
Oh ferchissakes, he is bearing his testiphony now...

*The ward shuffles as many wonder why Brother Droopy is walking toward the stand..*
"that's the inactive guy right???", some whisper...

Look everyone! The inactive jack Mormon has a testiphony!



What makes you think I'm "inactive"?
Nothing is going to startle us more when we pass through the veil to the other side than to realize how well we know our Father [in Heaven] and how familiar his face is to us

- President Ezra Taft Benson


I am so old that I can remember when most of the people promoting race hate were white.

- Thomas Sowell
_Droopy
_Emeritus
Posts: 9826
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 4:06 pm

Post by _Droopy »

The other generally spouts off rubbish about how everything is going to get better and then they wind up obese, alone, collecting disability checks while watching Oprah. Then they wake up the next day and they're on fire.



Riot! Riot!

You're getting better with age, Nehor...
Nothing is going to startle us more when we pass through the veil to the other side than to realize how well we know our Father [in Heaven] and how familiar his face is to us

- President Ezra Taft Benson


I am so old that I can remember when most of the people promoting race hate were white.

- Thomas Sowell
Post Reply