Christians not allowed to use restroom at Manti Pagent

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Roger Morrison
_Emeritus
Posts: 1831
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 4:13 am

Post by _Roger Morrison »

Looks like an interesting presentation. I'd like more information. Who put it on? Use of washrooms: Would Moslems have been permitted to use them? Who blocked entry to them? Was the presentation on public/private property? Too little information. Fill us in.
_Jason Bourne
_Emeritus
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:00 pm

Post by _Jason Bourne »

More like Evanglical Christian critics of the LDS Church not allowed to use the bathroom.

Though this surprises me. I have been at Church pageants and helped as volunteer security in the past. We were always told to let the EV critic to use the facilities. They even had passed from the pageant leadership allowing them in.
_Jason Bourne
_Emeritus
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:00 pm

Post by _Jason Bourne »

Roger Morrison wrote:Looks like an interesting presentation. I'd like more information. Who put it on? Use of washrooms: Would Moslems have been permitted to use them? Who blocked entry to them? Was the presentation on public/private property? Too little information. Fill us in.


THe Manti pageeant is held on the grounds of the Manti Temple. Private property.
_solomarineris
_Emeritus
Posts: 1207
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 1:51 am

Re: Christians not allowed to use restroom at Manti Pagent

Post by _solomarineris »



Do you see anything wrong with LDS members behavior?
I certainly don't.
Those idiots, posing themselves Bible thumping Christians are nothing but idiots, to waste their time
here in Manti. They make a big spectacle, disturb local people.
Serves them right.
Let them defend their ridiculous Bible their own turf.
And leave the Mormons alone.

I too, have little patient with morons.
_Angus McAwesome
_Emeritus
Posts: 579
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:32 pm

Post by _Angus McAwesome »

The cop in the first video even tells them they're on private property... Much ado about nothing.
I was afraid of the dark when I was young. "Don't be afraid, my son," my mother would always say. "The child-eating night goblins can smell fear." Bitch... - Kreepy Kat
_Hoops
_Emeritus
Posts: 2863
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:11 am

Post by _Hoops »

Real Christians never have to do such a sinful thing.
_Boaz & Lidia
_Emeritus
Posts: 1416
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:31 am

Post by _Boaz & Lidia »

Angus McAwesome wrote:The cop in the first video even tells them they're on private property... Much ado about nothing.
Yet the others who were not dressed in 1840 era dress were allowed to use the facilities, regardless whether they were members of the church which owns the "private property".
_Angus McAwesome
_Emeritus
Posts: 579
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:32 pm

Post by _Angus McAwesome »

Boaz & Lidia wrote:
Angus McAwesome wrote:The cop in the first video even tells them they're on private property... Much ado about nothing.
Yet the others who were not dressed in 1840 era dress were allowed to use the facilities, regardless whether they were members of the church which owns the "private property".


Doesn't matter. If the owner of employees of the property say you can't use the restroom and tell you to leave the premises then you must comply. Now if these twinkies can prove in a court of law that this was based on religious discrimination good for them, but when the security staff says "No" and then says "Leave" you can't use the restroom and you must go away.
I was afraid of the dark when I was young. "Don't be afraid, my son," my mother would always say. "The child-eating night goblins can smell fear." Bitch... - Kreepy Kat
_Boaz & Lidia
_Emeritus
Posts: 1416
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 8:31 am

Post by _Boaz & Lidia »

Angus McAwesome wrote:
Boaz & Lidia wrote:
Angus McAwesome wrote:The cop in the first video even tells them they're on private property... Much ado about nothing.
Yet the others who were not dressed in 1840 era dress were allowed to use the facilities, regardless whether they were members of the church which owns the "private property".


Doesn't matter. If the owner of employees of the property say you can't use the restroom and tell you to leave the premises then you must comply. Now if these twinkies can prove in a court of law that this was based on religious discrimination good for them, but when the security staff says "No" and then says "Leave" you can't use the restroom and you must go away.
Give me a break. Had Mormon missionaries been treated this way you know LDS Inc would run it up the PR flag pole.
Post Reply