Jersey Girl wrote:Whatever you do, Daniel, make no mention of the Chubby-T list on this board. I mean it.
I knew that eventually my own special anti-anti-Mormon list would be unveiled by someone here.
“I was hooked from the start,” Snoop Dogg said. “We talked about the purpose of life, played Mousetrap, and ate brownies. The kids thought it was off the hook, for real.”
Scottie wrote:Isn't that precisely what makes it so Freudian? That you hadn't thought about it? :)
Oh, I suppose. Which is good, I guess, for chats and cocktail party witticisms.
I just don't take Freudianism very seriously. (And I had legitimate, relevant reasons for each adjective I used.)
Freud himself, on the other hand, offers an interesting window into fin de siècle Vienna, a period whose thought and culture intrigue me. My wife and I have a nice Gustav Klimt reproduction hanging on our bedroom wall.
A few years ago I went to a Klimt exhibition at the Belvedere Palace in Vienna. A prodigious talent.
I'm partial to Winslow Homer. I've got a large print of his "Breezing Up" hanging over my fireplace mantel.
God . . . "who mouths morals to other people and has none himself; who frowns upon crimes, yet commits them all; who created man without invitation, . . . and finally, with altogether divine obtuseness, invites this poor, abused slave to worship him ..."
beastie wrote:by the way, I think we just proved msnobody's point.
Oh, I dunno.
I think that the demerits of Freud and the merits of Gustav Klimt and Winslow Homer are pretty substantial.
DCP,
You are so stupid.....
You permit yourself to make all kinds of comments on this board, yet you tattle tale us on MAD&d board, so we are
axed. You chase us away from MAD&d, follow us here.
BECAUSE YOU KNOW WHERE REAL THE FUN IS.
Just give thanks to Dr.Shades & moderators for allowing you free speech.
I certainly do.
Jersey Girl wrote:Hilarious and intellectually flaccid.
Not bad.
At the least, Freudianism provides fodder for occasional jokes (and a thin veneer of intellectual cover for the kinds of jokes most often associated with sexually curious but insecure adolescents), which is, I suppose, some contribution to modern life.
Daniel,
I hope that you know I didn't mean that remark as a commentary on you in any way, shape or form and that I was simply engaging in word play.
I like ya.
Jersey Girl
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
Okay, I'll "let the cat out of the bag" One of the main reasons I come here is for the occasional good laugh, and the sense of humour many have. Some time ago Droopy started a thread about "dirty, rotten, filthy apostates". The first "reply" came from Antishock, who posted this:
I swear, I didn't stop laughing for about three days. Every time I looked at it I cracked up. With that one image, Antishock achieved more than ten swearing posts. Maybe we need to not take everything so seriously sometimes, including ourselves, and as they say, laughter is the best medicine. While I like the serious discussions, we would go mad without humour.
Jersey Girl wrote:I hope that you know I didn't mean that remark as a commentary on you in any way, shape or form and that I was simply engaging in word play.
Not a problem. It never occurred to me to take it badly.
Jersey Girl wrote:I like ya.
That's mutual.
Gosh. Can the love fest get any worse? To which the answer is, Yes it can. Just watch what comes next:
I thought antishock8's photograph was really funny, too. Even he's not entirely without redeeming value.
msnobody wrote:Lately it seems to me that the terrestrial forum lacks substance.
So what are you, personally, doing to reverse that trend?
Outside of putting down Mormonism or an occasional Blixian-Steussian flirtation of an intellectual nature, what type of substance oriented discussion would flourish on this board?