Kudos for beastie

Post by **_Matt Amos** » Fri Aug 01, 2008 6:51 pm

beastie,

I just noticed your web site (http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com), and was duly impressed. Thank you for all of the good information and links. Incidentally, I noticed the link to the Sorenson's Bow discussion on ZLMB (http://p094.ezboard.com/fpacumenispagesfrm77.showMessage?topicID=121.topic) with the note about the missing image. Using one of that site's new features, I managed to add the image directly to the post, so you can remove the note from your web page.

Thanks,
Matt

Post by **_beastie** » Fri Aug 01, 2008 6:57 pm

Thank you Matt!! I really appreciate that. Glad you like the site. I will update the note next week.

Post by **_Scottie** » Fri Aug 01, 2008 7:07 pm

Beastie is one of the most smartest people I know.

I'll leave it up to you to decide whether she is that smart or if I don't know very many people... :)

Post by **_beastie** » Fri Aug 01, 2008 7:31 pm

Thanks, Scottie, that was very kind of you.

I'm really not that smart, although probably slightly above average. I know lots of people far smarter than I am. But, what I like to do that is somewhat unusual is to read obsessively about one topic for a couple of years in a row, so I tend to accumulate a lot of information about certain topics. and then look smart in those areas. ;)

Post by **_Bond...James Bond** » Sat Aug 02, 2008 4:01 am

beastie wrote:I'm really not that smart, although probably slightly above average. I know lots of people far smarter than I am. But, what I like to do that is somewhat unusual is to read obsessively about one topic for a couple of years in a row, so I tend to accumulate a lot of information about certain topics. and then look smart in those areas. ;)

Too true. Beastie just get props cause she's [way way way] knowledgeable about something LDS related, and thus can pwn people on those issues. I'm sure if you met me on a....um.....um.....a [unidentified] forum I'd be getting total props and steamrolling people.

Post by **_beastie** » Sat Aug 02, 2008 3:02 pm

LOL!

by the way, not to reveal my age-related deficiencies, I think I understand what "OWNED" means, but what does "PWN" mean? The exact same thing? Why change the O to a P?

I have a feeling this question is going to cause hilarity in the young'uns.

Post by **_Jersey Girl** » Sat Aug 02, 2008 4:44 pm

beastie wrote:LOL!

by the way, not to reveal my age-related deficiencies, I think I understand what "OWNED" means, but what does "PWN" mean? The exact same thing? Why change the O to a P?

I have a feeling this question is going to cause hilarity in the young'uns.

Why change the O to a P?

Because he's typing with boy fingers.

Post by **_beastie** » Sat Aug 02, 2008 4:48 pm

Why change the O to a P?

Because he's typing with boy fingers.

You're old like me. You know NUTTIN.

Post by **_Bond...James Bond** » Sat Aug 02, 2008 4:50 pm

beastie wrote:LOL!

by the way, not to reveal my age-related deficiencies, I think I understand what "OWNED" means, but what does "PWN" mean? The exact same thing? Why change the O to a P?

I have a feeling this question is going to cause hilarity in the young'uns.

LOL. That's a true typo. That's where the "pwned" comes from. Typos when trying to type "owned". Yeah owned=pwned.

Post by **_Jersey Girl** » Sat Aug 02, 2008 4:51 pm

beastie wrote:
Why change the O to a P?

Because he's typing with boy fingers.

You're old like me. You know NUTTIN.

Whatchu talkin' about, girl?