antishock8 wrote:You were just insulting to me. I wasn't addressing you. Yet, you referred to me as a blathering idiot. Wouldn't I be justified in calling you an insult if I so chose? Sure I would. You went there. Keep that in mind when you're attempting to be objective.
Jason wrote:I said you look like a blathering idiot which I know based on other reasonable posts by you that you are not.
antishock8 wrote:So. Shame on you. You are being a hypocrit.
Jason wrote:Well now you and Crockett both think I am a hypocrite. You are probably both correct to some extent. I am just a damned anonymous hypocrite.
Well, this is what I'm talking about. You get a little huffy when labeled something even though the nuance is in the same context you used in your insult. Me? I don't really care, but it might help you see yourself through my eyes.
Reference the RCrockett "moron" statement. He was mocking me that I could think that "rocks" wouldn't roll down a hill and disappear, and then he called me a radish head (which is probably a play on cabbage head, racist, sexist, misogynist). I, in turn, mocked him for thinking that stone slabs, not rocks, could slide all the way down the hill, into a distant stream, and then "wash away". So, yes, you ARE a moron if you actually believe that stone slabs would slide all the down the Hill Cumorah, into a distant stream, and then "wash away". That makes you dumb, ahem, as a box, ahem, of rocks, ahem.