Online Apologetics and "Collateral Damage"

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_silentkid
_Emeritus
Posts: 1606
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 5:50 pm

Re: Online Apologetics and "Collateral Damage"

Post by _silentkid »

HI?

Image
_KimberlyAnn
_Emeritus
Posts: 3171
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 2:03 pm

Re: Online Apologetics and "Collateral Damage"

Post by _KimberlyAnn »

silentkid wrote:HI?

Image


He'll take your Huggies and whatever cash you got.

Brilliant, SK!

KA
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: Online Apologetics and "Collateral Damage"

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

Mister Scratch wrote:My attorney advised me to simply keep track of your threats.

Thus far, there've been none. And, given my Type B personality, there aren't likely to be any.

So your task looks to be pretty simple.

Mister Scratch wrote:You have been told to cease the behavior, so that's that.

No I haven't. Could you please have him send me a letter to that effect on his firm's stationery? I'll want to keep it on file for my defense, in case you attempt to silence me and to wipe me out financially.

Have him send the letter either to my BYU office or my home. Both addresses are easily located.

Mister Scratch wrote:None of my posts could reasonably be construed as "character assassination."

LOL. Very few of them haven't involved character assassination.

Mister Scratch wrote:You would also have to apologize for such things as your "whisper campaigns" against Robert Ritner and Mike Quinn.

I apologize for conducting "whisper campaigns" against Robert Ritner and Mike Quinn, for destroying the Great Wall of China, for sinking the island of Maui, for making Winston Churchill the prime minister of Swaziland, for moving Los Angeles up to Alaska, for revealing that Hamlet was really written by Spike Lee, for defeating General Grant at the Battle of Appomattox Courthouse, and for all manner of other purely imaginary offenses.
_LifeOnaPlate
_Emeritus
Posts: 2799
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:50 pm

Re: Online Apologetics and "Collateral Damage"

Post by _LifeOnaPlate »

Mister Scratch wrote:Then prove it, LoaP.



Here you go:

search.php?author_id=55&sr=posts
One moment in annihilation's waste,
one moment, of the well of life to taste-
The stars are setting and the caravan
starts for the dawn of nothing; Oh, make haste!

-Omar Khayaam

*Be on the lookout for the forthcoming album from Jiminy Finn and the Moneydiggers.*
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: Online Apologetics and "Collateral Damage"

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

harmony wrote:I hesitate to confirm it, but I suspect I am lumped with you, Rollo.

No. Not really. Don't flatter yourself. I don't take you very seriously, to be candid, but you've certainly not in the league of the Scartchii when it comes to cold, focused, never-ceasing personal hostility.

harmony wrote:And Dartagnen. He has absolutely no use for Dartagnen either.

I simply have no interest in interacting with him. But that's a different matter.

Nope. You're wrong on both counts.

Actually, I despise the entire world. Heh heh heh. As Scartch has so perceptively noted, I'm a "seething cauldron of hate." I wish he didn't have the uncanny abiility that he has, to look deeply and with perfect accuracy into the cankered depravity of my evil soul.
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Re: Online Apologetics and "Collateral Damage"

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Daniel Peterson wrote:
Mister Scratch wrote:You have been told to cease the behavior, so that's that.

No I haven't. Could you please have him send me a letter to that effect on his firm's stationery? I'll want to keep it on file for my defense, in case you attempt to silence me and to wipe me out financially.


Sure, I'd be glad to arrange that. As soon as you do the same, following the legal threats you made against Rollo Tomasi and myself (over your Quinn gossiping), and later against myself, Gadianton, and Dr. Shades (over FARMS finances).

Come to think of it, Dr. Peterson, it seems that you have quite a penchant for issuing legal threats.


Mister Scratch wrote:None of my posts could reasonably be construed as "character assassination."

LOL. Very few of them haven't involved character assassination.


Again: I issue to you the same challenge I issued to LifeOnaPlate. Feel free to back up your accusation with actual evidence. Mere labels tend to be pretty meaningless.

Mister Scratch wrote:You would also have to apologize for such things as your "whisper campaigns" against Robert Ritner and Mike Quinn.

I apologize for conducting "whisper campaigns" against Robert Ritner and Mike Quinn


Good for you. This is a "watershed" moment. Into the sig-line it goes. Also: would you like me to let these men know that, at last, you have admitted that you feel badly about what you did to them?
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: Online Apologetics and "Collateral Damage"

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Mister Scratch wrote:Sure, I'd be glad to arrange that. As soon as you do the same, following the legal threats you made against Rollo Tomasi and myself (over your Quinn gossiping), and later against myself, Gadianton, and Dr. Shades (over FARMS finances).


With all due respect to all parties, I do not perceive any communication I have received from Daniel Peterson as having contained a legal threat.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_cksalmon
_Emeritus
Posts: 1267
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 10:20 pm

Re: Online Apologetics and "Collateral Damage"

Post by _cksalmon »

Dr. Shades wrote:
Mister Scratch wrote:Sure, I'd be glad to arrange that. As soon as you do the same, following the legal threats you made against Rollo Tomasi and myself (over your Quinn gossiping), and later against myself, Gadianton, and Dr. Shades (over FARMS finances).


With all due respect to all parties, I do not perceive any communication I have received from Daniel Peterson as having contained a legal threat.


Then, I suppose, you perceived the manifest threat to have been illegal, eh?

The porridge thickens.
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: Online Apologetics and "Collateral Damage"

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

Mister Scratch wrote:Sure, I'd be glad to arrange that. As soon as you do the same, following the legal threats you made against Rollo Tomasi and myself (over your [mythical] Quinn gossiping), and later against myself, Gadianton, and Dr. Shades (over FARMS finances).

I've never consulted with "my lawyer" about these matters, and have never claimed to have done so. Thus, I have no lawyer who would send you a lawyer's letter.

You, by contrast, claim to have spoken with your lawyer about my supposed homocidal threats, and you claim that I've now been warned. But your warning me on a message board doesn't seem to constitute a warning from your lawyer. Indeed, I have no actual reason to believe that you've spoken with a lawyer at all. (Candidly, I strongly doubt it.)

If you really want me to believe that a lawyer is monitoring my "behavior" here and that I've been "warned," evidence would be helpful.

Mister Scratch wrote:
I apologize for conducting "whisper campaigns" against Robert Ritner and Mike Quinn

Good for you. This is a "watershed" moment. Into the sig-line it goes.

I certainly hope so.

So long as it remains there, that truncated and de-contextualized quote will serve as a clear illustration of your malignant crusade's reliance upon spin and misrepresentation.

Mister Scratch wrote:Also: would you like me to let these men know that, at last, you have admitted that you feel badly about what you did to them?

Certainly. I insist, though, that you include in the same notification my apologies and my sorrow for having bullied them on the schoolyard when we were small and were pupils in the same Indonesian madrasa, for dispatching the black helicopters that hover above their homes, for infecting them via tainted rutabaga with their most recent colds, for causing occasional turbulence on their television screens, and for raiding their refrigerators in search of Grey Poupon mustard.

They need to have some idea, when and if they hear from you, what kind of a person they're hearing from.
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Re: Online Apologetics and "Collateral Damage"

Post by _Some Schmo »

Daniel Peterson wrote:
harmony wrote:And Dartagnen. He has absolutely no use for Dartagnen either.

I simply have no interest in interacting with him. But that's a different matter.

Well, what do you know...? We have something in common.
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
Post Reply