Mister Scratch wrote:Where have I ever claimed to be an "authority" on Mopologetics? I have stated that I consider myself to be "critic" of Mopologetics.
Okay. I freely grant that I was wrong. You don't know "apologetic" literature very well.
Mister Scratch wrote:You won't, indeed you cannot "embarrass" me without a link, my dear Professor!
I doubt that I could embarrass
you even
with a link!
Mister Scratch wrote:[And again: if these are so freely available, so easy to access, then you'll have no problem supplying a link.
I would have no problem whatever supplying a link. Materials from Novick about Midgley are up, on line. They've appeared in print. FARMS, or the Maxwell Institute, published them. They're not hidden or concealed.
The fact that the self-appointed critic of Mopologetics isn't familiar with them is a nice illustration of the self-appointed critic's unfamiliarity with the material that he's appointed himself to criticize.
Too funny!
Mister Scratch wrote:Part of my overall thesis in my ongoing threads is that the LDS Church, and by extension Mopologists (i.e., the "belligerents") are attempting to suppress history.
But you'll look in vain for anything demonstrating that I favor the suppression of history. I simply don't.
Mister Scratch wrote:So, I suppose I should thank you for helping to demonstrate my thesis, since you are obviously trying very hard to avoid posting a link to the Novick material.
I'm not "trying hard." I'm
doing it.
Easily.
The Novick material has been published both in print and on line. Your cluelessness on this is both amusing and revealing.