Post your search results from josephsmith.net

[Guest]

Hit http://www.josephsmith.net/ then click the seach link at the top.

Enter the results of your seach strings here in reply posts.

Bold your search string in the results:

Your search for historical truth about polygamy has returned 0 results in JosephSmith.net.

Your search for historical accuracy concerning polygamy has returned 0 results in JosephSmith.net.



Have fun with it:

Your search for screwing mia maids has returned 0 results in JosephSmith.net.

Your search for cheating on Emma has returned 0 results in JosephSmith.net.

Your search for getting a piece of ass from Fanny has returned 0 results in JosephSmith.net.

Your search for screwing other men's wives has returned 0 results in JosephSmith.net.


Perhaps the website should be pronounced "Joseph's Myth dot net"


.

.

[_The Nehor]

I use google:

Your search - collegeterrace "mentally stable" - did not match any documents.

Your search - collegeterrace "not an idiot" - did not match any documents.

Results 1 - 10 of about 25,200 for Boaz practices bestiality

Results 1 - 10 of about 1,550 for Polygamy Porter pedophile

Results 1 - 10 of about 53 for Polygamy Porter "sexual deviant"

This is fun.

[Analytics]

And here I thought this was going to be some kind of quiz along the lines of "Which of Joseph's Wives are you?"

As for my part, I'm not interested in talking dirty to a search engine since I suspect that search engines tend to win the dirty talk battles by number of word and the secret weapon: pictures. May I be struck blind (or dead) before I google collegeterrace and anything dirty.

[_Sethbag]

Your search for getting a piece of ass from Fanny has returned 0 results in JosephSmith.net.

To one who is familiar with British slang, this one is a little ironic.

[_The Nehor]

And here I thought this was going to be some kind of quiz along the lines of "Which of Joseph's Wives are you" or someting. As for my part, I'm not interested in talking dirty to a search engine since I suspect that search engines tend to win the dirty talk battles by number of word and the secret weapon: pictures. May I be struck blind (or dead) before I google collegeterrace and anything dirty.

For the safety of my soul I did not click on any of the links provided.

[_asbestosman]

For the safety of my soul I did not click on any of the links provided.

Problem is, Google often shows a picture just from the search. Example: grapes

[_The Nehor]

Your search for getting a piece of ass from Fanny has returned 0 results in JosephSmith.net.

To one who is familiar with British slang, this one is a little ironic.

I served my Mission there......I figured I might be the only one.

[_Tarski]

For the safety of my soul I did not click on any of the links provided.

Problem is, Google often shows a picture just from the search. Example: grapes

Right. If you type in the wrong thing you might see some skin and turn into a pillar of salt (so to speak). :)

[_asbestosman]

Right. If you type in the wrong thing you might see some skin and turn into a pillar of salt (so to speak). :)

I'm only worried if the skin belongs to someone like collegeterrace. I wouldn't be nearly so worried if that skin belonged to . . .

I'd just blame the viewing on an accident and count it as a freebie I don't need to repent of. :)

[_Jason Bourne]

I did three searches:

Polygamy: O results

Plural Marriage: 0 results

D&C 132: 14 results but not one mentions plural marriage.\


I wonder what the Church thinks it will achieve by doing this? Oh I guess it is like it says in the current Relief Society/Priesthood Manual-the manual does not address things like plural marriage and consecration because are not under these mandates in this day and age. Hmmmmm