Mister Scratch wrote:It is a point, Dan, and you know it is.
It's silly nonsense, and you're a loon.
Mister Scratch wrote:You can continue to try and sidestep the basic issue, but I feel confident that you know, on some level, that this is a terrible blow to Tvedtnes's credibility, and by extension, the credibility of FARMS and Mopologetics.
Taken at its absolute worst, it would be a bit of embarrassing exaggeration about his CV on the part of John Tvedtnes that reflects not at all on the credibility of FARMS and "Mopologetics" nor even, really, on the validity of any scholarly argument ever advanced by John Tvedtnes himself.
It's irrelevant.
Mister Scratch wrote:Trevor and Jersey Girl (whether they realize it or not) have also begun to ridicule Tvedtnes's braggadocio.
They can do what they want. It's no concern of mine. It has absolutely nothing to do with the validity or lack of validity of any argument ever published by FARMS.
Mister Scratch wrote:Really: are his SHIELDS postings any different from all of our postings here on MDB? No, not so much.
I don't really see much resemblance between most of the items listed in his bibliography and the typical MDB post:
http://www.shields-research.org/Authors ... iblio.htmlOne big
difference, of course, is that John Tvedtnes isn't a malevolently obsessive
loon.