... our church isn't true, but we have to keep up appearances so we don't get shunned by our friends and family, fired from our jobs, kicked out of our homes, ... Please don't tell on me. ~maklelan
The issue is a really complex one and I have friends and family on either side of the whole debate (or the two debates: early pregnancy choice and later termination on fetal medical grounds). Also I should not mention personal details about family members as I am not very careful about 'protecting' my own identity on the net which is my choice not theirs.
dartagnan wrote:I never heard of such a thing until tonight. This woman is pretty passionate about this subject, and she advertises “If Barack Obama had his way I would not be here.” That's not an unreasonable point to make if you think about it. It certainly isn't a falsehood.
I find it a very unreasonable point. Just because Obama had nuanced reasons to oppose this specific bill doesn't mean that "his way" is in favor of killing babies. This type of smear is ugly and should be beneath you.
Obama said that he was in favor of the federal version of the bill that did in fact pass.
dartagnan wrote:At what point do you think killing a fetus/baby becomes murder? Meaning, when does it become a person with rights?
This is an answer I've never really been able to get from the pro-abortionists.
Have you asked the question to people who are pro-choice?
The line is drawn at the point of viability. If the fetus can survive outside of the womb, it is a child; if it can't, it is a previable fetus.
It’s relatively easy to agree that only Homo sapiens can speak about things that don’t really exist, and believe six impossible things before breakfast. You could never convince a monkey to give you a banana by promising him limitless bananas after death in monkey heaven.
I'm pro-choice and I draw the line of personhood around the development of the telencephalon and its associated development of consciousness, desires, etc. Since that doesn't provide a bright line anymore than attempting to figure out when hot becomes cold, I think we start talking about a growing penumbra of rights at around the end of the first trimester. I think the viability standard is indefensible. I can understand why one might argue that mother's rights to her body Trump a fetus's in certain circumstances, but it's hard to make sense of why independent viability is a quality that makes one deserving of moral respect.
But it's nice to again see Kevin say he hasn't heard what [x] thinks about something and in the process reveal he hasn't gone through the trouble of developing minimal familiarity with what he is expressing disagreement with.