Grammar Nazi: Which is best?

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
Post Reply
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Grammar Nazi: Which is best?

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Here they are, Shades:

Unorganized
Disorganized

Disinvite
Deinvite

Feel free to correct the spellings if needed. While reading online (not just this board, by the way) I find myself totally bugged by the use of these words.

Which versions are best?
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: Grammar Nazi: Which is best?

Post by _Dr. Shades »

It depends on the meaning you're going for; the nuances are different.

Unorganized: Not organized yet due to a LACK OF human intervention.
Disorganized: No longer organized THANKS TO human intervention.

Disinvite: A withdrawal of an invitation by the person who extended it.
Deinvite: A cancellation of an invitation by someone OTHER THAN the person who extended it.

Hope that helps.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_krose
_Emeritus
Posts: 2555
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:18 pm

Re: Grammar Nazi: Which is best?

Post by _krose »

Okay, I'll accept the invitation to pick at your grammar.

It should be "which is better," because you're only comparing two options.
"The DNA of fictional populations appears to be the most susceptible to extinction." - Simon Southerton
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Grammar Nazi: Which is best?

Post by _Jersey Girl »

krose wrote:Okay, I'll accept the invitation to pick at your grammar.

It should be "which is better," because you're only comparing two options.


You talkin' to me, krose?

First of all, I was comparing two SETS of options.

If you'd like to correct the sentence appropriately, it would read something like this:

Which version is best. (Appropriate to two options only)
Which versions are best. (Appropriate to two options in multiple SETS)

The second is what I wrote.

But we wouldn't want to pick nits now, would we?

;-P
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_krose
_Emeritus
Posts: 2555
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:18 pm

Re: Grammar Nazi: Which is best?

Post by _krose »

Sorry, but it doesn't matter how many sets of choices you have; if there are only two options in each set, "better" is always the proper comparison term. "Best" can only be used to describe one option from three or more parallel choices.

If your question was really about which one of the four words you typed is preferred, then "best" is appropriate.

Example:
- Unorganized
- Disorganized
- Disinvite
- Deinvite
Question: Which is best?
My answer: Disorganized

The proper question would have been, "Which option is better in each pair of words?"

Yes, it's a pretty minor grammar issue, and a commonly made error, but an error nonetheless.
"The DNA of fictional populations appears to be the most susceptible to extinction." - Simon Southerton
_SUAS
_Emeritus
Posts: 214
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 4:14 pm

Re: Grammar Nazi: Which is best?

Post by _SUAS »

Or I would have asked the following:

What is the best?

Which one is the best?

And why would you dis-invite someone anyway? Uninvite or

English should flow, not get lost on the tongue..or mind.
God has left the building and is staying at Motel 8
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Post by _Dr. Shades »

SUAS wrote:And why would you dis-invite someone anyway?


If your spouse was in a car accident and was in the hospital fighting for his/her life. That would tend to sabotage dinner plans.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
Post Reply