Scratch, DCP, and the IRS

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Re: Apologetics: Why bother?

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Daniel Peterson wrote:
Mister Scratch wrote:I still wonder, for example, if the 20K was actually in excess of DCP's salary, but he arranged for it to be funneled back into apologetics.

I didn't. (What nonsense.)


Why is it nonsense? Do you mean to say that you have never "donated" the money you made back into FARMS/apologetics?

Mister Scratch wrote:I also wonder why the accountant who filed those 990 forms was fired.

Jersey Girl's description of you as a "gossip whore" was right on target.

The reasons for his dismissal are absolutely none of your business.


Then you should never have brought it up. As I recall, you mentioned it (on another thread) in an effort to divert attention away from yourself.
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: Re:

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

Mister Scratch wrote:at the time of the 990 form in question, FARMS was not a part of BYU.

As even Wikipedia knows, FARMS was affiliated with BYU beginning in 1997. (In fact, formal institutional links go back even before that.)

Mister Scratch wrote:And, just because Liz---or whomever---did not put the right information on the form does not make it kosher.

Unbelievable.

Scartch is apparently unfamiliar with how universities work, so, in Scartchworld, it's all lies and corruption.

Mister Scratch wrote:Furthermore, DCP and other apologists have denied up and down, over and over again, that they receive no money of any kind for apologetics. Once again: this just isn't true.

I have never, ever, not once, said that I've never received any money at all for anything I've ever done in apologetics.

But I've never been paid $20,000 during any year, nor anything even close to that.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Sep 24, 2008 10:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: Apologetics: Why bother?

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

Mister Scratch wrote:Why is it nonsense? Do you mean to say that you have never "donated" the money you made back into FARMS/apologetics?

I've made small donations, or failed to claim expenses, on numerous occasions. But I've never directed an accountant to pour my money back into FARMS. Not $20K. Not anything.

Mister Scratch wrote:
Jersey Girl's description of you as a "gossip whore" was right on target.

The reasons for his dismissal are absolutely none of your business.
Then you should never have brought it up. As I recall, you mentioned it (on another thread) in an effort to divert attention away from yourself.

I mentioned it to suggest that the IRS form may not be inerrant.

Beyond that, the accountant's employment history and our grounds for dismissing him are absolutely none of your concern.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Apologetics: Why bother?

Post by _harmony »

Daniel Peterson wrote:
Mister Scratch wrote:Why is it nonsense? Do you mean to say that you have never "donated" the money you made back into FARMS/apologetics?

I've made small donations, or failed to claim expenses, on numerous occasions. But I've never directed an accountant to pour my money back into FARMS. Not $20K. Not anything.


Okay.

Can we bury this now? Scratch made a statement; Daniel denied it. This continual hounding is just wrong.

Asked and answers, for hell's sake! Let... it... go!
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_JustMe
_Emeritus
Posts: 321
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:37 am

Re: Apologetics: Why bother?

Post by _JustMe »

I second Harmony. Scratch for Pete sake knock it off already. You are really, REALLY becoming a bore. And yes, I already have stopped reading your tripe. You have no fear along that avenue. Now then, I was just starting to have good conversations with beastie and Jersey Girl, where was I? LOL!
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: Apologetics: Why bother?

Post by _Dr. Shades »

JustMe wrote:Scratch for Pete sake knock it off already. You are really, REALLY becoming a bore. And yes, I already have stopped reading your tripe.


If you have already stopped reading his stuff, then how do you know whether he's becoming a bore?
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_JustMe
_Emeritus
Posts: 321
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:37 am

Re: Apologetics: Why bother?

Post by _JustMe »

Scratch for Pete sake knock it off already. You are really, REALLY becoming a bore. And yes, I already have stopped reading your tripe.

If you have already stopped reading his stuff, then how do you know whether he's becoming a bore?


Because he chooses to write nothing less than boring. His is the most unsubstantial gossip on the internet. It is irrelevant what subjects, or what he writes. It's a foregone conclusion. lol......
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Re:

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Mister Scratch wrote:
Dr. Shades wrote:Thanks, Mister Scratch and Daniel Peterson, for your replies.

Mr. Scratch: Just to be sure I'm properly grasping things, if the 990 form had been more clearly labeled, e.g. "$20,000: Dept. of Asian & Near Eastern Languages, BYU, re. compensation for services of Daniel Peterson," as opposed to merely "$20,000: Daniel Peterson," would your opinion of all this be different?


Yes, it would. As Liz points out, it is not terribly uncommon for money to "change hands," as it were, within a University. However, at the time of the 990 form in question, FARMS was not a part of BYU. And, just because Liz---or whomever---did not put the right information on the form does not make it kosher.

Furthermore, DCP and other apologists have denied up and down, over and over again, that they receive no money of any kind for apologetics. Once again: this just isn't true.


Can this thread be split off?

I'm really sick of this.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Yoda

Re: Scratch, DCP, and the IRS

Post by _Yoda »

Jersey Girl wrote:Can this thread be split off?

I'm really sick of this.


Only because I love you! ;)
_Yoda

Re: Scratch, DCP, and the IRS

Post by _Yoda »

Moderator Note--Thread split from Jersey Girl's Apologetics thread.
Post Reply