You have admitted that your theory is just a possibility, not that you've proven it in fact occurred. My position is just as strong as yours (if not stronger) based on the Form 990. You've done nothing more than assumed (based on DCP's claims alone, despite his own relucatance to even look at the Form 990) that FARMS paid the $20,400 to BYU, but have admitted this is only a possibility and not proven. So, Mr. Accountant, who is looking foolish now?
You look foolish. Just call Dan a bold faced liar then and be done with it.
It means something because Jason is desperately trying to come up with something to get you off the hook, but there simply is no connection between you and BYU in the Form 990 (even with the address, although it was used for nearly every other board member).
Desperately? Hardly. I just explained that the 990 is prepared correctly even though it shows DCP as getting the payment and this based on his testimony that he did not get it and it went to BYU. I admit if he is lying then I am wrong. I just don't think he is lying. You do. But desperate? Look in the mirror Rollo.
You have admitted that your theory is just a possibility, not that you've proven it in fact occurred. My position is just as strong as yours (if not stronger) based on the Form 990. You've done nothing more than assumed (based on DCP's claims alone, despite his own relucatance to even look at the Form 990) that FARMS paid the $20,400 to BYU, but have admitted this is only a possibility and not proven. So, Mr. Accountant, who is looking foolish now?
You look foolish. Just call Dan a bold[sic] faced liar then and be done with it.
Nice comeback. by the way, it's "bald-faced liar."
"Moving beyond apologist persuasion, LDS polemicists furiously (and often fraudulently) attack any non-traditional view of Mormonism. They don't mince words -- they mince the truth."
-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)
It means something because Jason is desperately trying to come up with something to get you off the hook, but there simply is no connection between you and BYU in the Form 990 (even with the address, although it was used for nearly every other board member).
Desperately? Hardly. I just explained that the 990 is prepared correctly even though it shows DCP as getting the payment and this based on his testimony that he did not get it and it went to BYU. I admit if he is lying then I am wrong. I just don't think he is lying. You do. But desperate? Look in the mirror Rollo.
You simply showed it was a possiblility, but, even then, I think it's a slim one because the Form 990 makes no connection between DCP and BYU (as it does with other board members who were paid). There simply is no evidence in the Form 990 that FARMS paid BYU anything for DCP's services as board chair. I know you very much want to believe DCP on this, but there is no objective evidence to support his claim. In the end, the Form 990 says what it says.
"Moving beyond apologist persuasion, LDS polemicists furiously (and often fraudulently) attack any non-traditional view of Mormonism. They don't mince words -- they mince the truth."
-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)
Daniel Peterson wrote:Scartchoplexy manifests itself in the unshakeable conviction that I do not, cannot, tell the truth.
Not at all -- just that you are not infallible and make mistakes (particularly when you refuse to even look at the Form 990).
[Rollo Tomasi] is in the terminal stages of the disease.
Whatever makes you sleep better at night, Bishop Busybody.
"Moving beyond apologist persuasion, LDS polemicists furiously (and often fraudulently) attack any non-traditional view of Mormonism. They don't mince words -- they mince the truth."
-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)
Mini-Scartch wrote:Not at all -- just that you are not infallible and make mistakes (particularly when you refuse to even look at the Form 990).
In other words, that I'm so idiotic, so utterly clueless, that I can't know whether my annual salary is, say, $40,000.00 or $60,000.00 without looking it up on an IRS form.
Mini-Scartch wrote:Whatever makes you sleep better at night, Bishop Busybody.
Some people seem to think that only females can be "catty." I've never believed that to be even remotely true.
Rollo Tomasi wrote:Whatever makes you sleep better at night, Bishop Busybody.
Some people seem to think that only females can be "catty." I've never believed that to be even remotely true.
You proved them wrong.
"Moving beyond apologist persuasion, LDS polemicists furiously (and often fraudulently) attack any non-traditional view of Mormonism. They don't mince words -- they mince the truth."
-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)