JustMe's motto--is it legitimate?

[_Jersey Girl]

You keep saying this as if it means something. Are you implying that one must sleep with Kerry Shirts in order to critique his many mediocre attempts at Mopologetics?

There you go exaggerating again, GoodK. Is that what you have to do in order to defend your remarks?

Defend my remarks? It's more like what I have to do in order to mock something I think is stupid...

No, one needn't "sleep with Kerry Shirts" in order to critique his apologetics and I wonder if you'd have made that sort of remark if you were responding to a male poster?

Oh, Christ. Here we go... I should have known.

Is quietly suggesting sexism what you have to do in order to defend your remarks?

You do not. You have not engaged his apologetics in the least.

I defy you to show me what relevance that has to the OP.

Your remarks from their onsent on this thread had nothing to do with the OP, the context from where they originated and had only to do with the person who originally posted them who you treat as a one dimensional character with an "apologist" bullseye slapped across his forehead for you to shoot at. If you want to swing your intellectual dick in my presence, I'm afraid you'll have to graduate from soft ball to hard ball before I begin to take you seriously, otherwise your words are more well suited for a junior high boys lockeroom wall.

See? I can do it too.

[_GoodK]

If you want to swing your intellectual dick in my presence, I'm afraid you'll have to graduate from soft ball to hard ball before I begin to take you seriously, otherwise your words are more well suited for a junior high boys lockeroom wall.

What about non-intellectual dicks?

What's the requirement for swinging those in your presence?

I can do it too, too ;)

[_Jersey Girl]

If you want to swing your intellectual dick in my presence, I'm afraid you'll have to graduate from soft ball to hard ball before I begin to take you seriously, otherwise your words are more well suited for a junior high boys lockeroom wall.

What about non-intellectual dicks?

What's the requirement for swinging those in your presence?

I can do it too, too ;)

I'm afraid I require hard facts and solid proof that such a thing exists and evidence that a quality man is is at the controls and in control of his life, before I would consider anything of the kind.

Sadly (or not) for you, that position has already been filled.

[_GoodK]

a quality man is is at the controls

LOL

What were we talking about, again?

[_Dr. Shades]

My poor thread!

[_Jersey Girl]

Dear Dr. Shades...

I am writing to publicly confess to you, and the community at large, my recent transgressions against you in the partial derailment of your serious and intellectually stimulating topical thread.

I would like to offer you my apology if only I accepted full responsiblity for the condition in which you found your thread. Were it not for the presence of GoodK, I would not have been tempted to engage in low level tit for tat here.

The truth is, Dr. Shades, that I largely blame GoodK and when it comes to full derailment and obliteration of topic, I can do and have done far worse on my own. But not on your board, not yet. If, at some point in the future, I should feel moved to do so, there will be no mistaking my special powers. ;-)

That is to say, count your lucky stars that GoodK was here to prevent the worst Jersey-Girl-at-full-throttle thread derailment of all time, of which I am fully capable, yet in this instance, not fully culpable at all. So, in essence, you should be on your knees thanking GoodK and wisely not singling me out for any reason.

Rejoice and be glad for the remaining remnants of your thread!

This Means
YOu !!

Jersey Girl
(Not a board sniper)

[_Dr. Shades]

Were it not for the presence of GoodK, I would not have been tempted to engage in low level tit for tat here.

So GoodK is responsible for your actions, not you?

The truth is, Dr. Shades, that I largely blame GoodK and when it comes to full derailment and obliteration of topic, I can do and have done far worse on my own.

So I should ignore what happened to the thread simply because it could've been worse?

(Not a board sniper)

Even after that boasting about your thread-derailing prowess?

[_Jersey Girl]

Were it not for the presence of GoodK, I would not have been tempted to engage in low level tit for tat here.

So GoodK is responsible for your actions, not you?

The truth is, Dr. Shades, that I largely blame GoodK and when it comes to full derailment and obliteration of topic, I can do and have done far worse on my own.

So I should ignore what happened to the thread simply because it could've been worse?

(Not a board sniper)

Even after that boasting about your thread-derailing prowess?

Lighten up sweet knees, and have some fun with your board.