LDS.org posts Book of Mormon translation that opposes Peterson's PBS one

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Ray A

Re: LDS.org posts Book of Mormon translation that opposes Peterson's PBS one

Post by _Ray A »

Neo, I'll try my own simplified "translation" for you:

The plates were written in Reformed Egyptian. Joseph couldn't read Reformed Egyptian. Through the seerstone he could see the translation, and even the correct spelling of names. Were the plates needed? Not really. They could have been 5,000 miles away, and Joseph could still have had the translation through the seerstone, hence the analogy to computers.

Does that help at all? Maybe not.
_Neo
_Emeritus
Posts: 87
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 9:20 pm

Re: LDS.org posts Book of Mormon translation that opposes Peterson's PBS one

Post by _Neo »

Ray A wrote:Neo, I'll try my own simplified "translation" for you:

The plates were written in Reformed Egyptian. Joseph couldn't read Reformed Egyptian. Through the seerstone he could see the translation, and even the correct spelling of names. Were the plates needed? Not really. They could have been 5,000 miles away, and Joseph could still have had the translation through the seerstone, hence the analogy to computers.

Does that help at all? Maybe not.

Yes, this helps me understand the analogy.

I guess my issue is this.
If the plates were used for the translation, then the seerstone had no relevance.
If the seerstone was used for the translation, then the plates had no relevance.
_Ray A

Re: LDS.org posts Book of Mormon translation that opposes Peterson's PBS one

Post by _Ray A »

Neo wrote:Yes, this helps me understand the analogy.

I guess my issue is this.
If the plates were used for the translation, then the seerstone had no relevance.
If the seerstone was used for the translation, then the plates had no relevance.


In theory the plates weren't needed at all. They could have remained buried in the earth, and upon obtaining the seerstone, Joseph could have done the translation. DCP argues that the plates were tangible evidence that the translation came from somewhere (if I understand him correctly). And that is why they were "needed", to assure Joseph and his followers that the translation didn't come out of thin air, but from tangible plates.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: LDS.org posts Book of Mormon translation that opposes Peterson's PBS one

Post by _harmony »

Ray A wrote:
Neo wrote:Yes, this helps me understand the analogy.

I guess my issue is this.
If the plates were used for the translation, then the seerstone had no relevance.
If the seerstone was used for the translation, then the plates had no relevance.


In theory the plates weren't needed at all. They could have remained buried in the earth, and upon obtaining the seerstone, Joseph could have done the translation. DCP argues that the plates were tangible evidence that the translation came from somewhere (if I understand him correctly). And that is why they were "needed", to assure Joseph and his followers that the translation didn't come out of thin air, but from tangible plates.


But it did come out of thin air. Well, depending on the air inside the hat, but still...
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Ray A

Re: LDS.org posts Book of Mormon translation that opposes Peterson's PBS one

Post by _Ray A »

harmony wrote:
But it did come out of thin air. Well, depending on the air inside the hat, but still...


I have my own theory. Not very scientific, but I think it's the best fit considering all the circumstances.
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: LDS.org posts Book of Mormon translation that opposes Peterson's PBS one

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

harmony wrote:But it did come out of thin air. Well, depending on the air inside the hat, but still...

No, harmony. Your opinion on this comes out of thin air. Don't get confused, dear.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: LDS.org posts Book of Mormon translation that opposes Peterson's PBS one

Post by _harmony »

Daniel Peterson wrote:
harmony wrote:But it did come out of thin air. Well, depending on the air inside the hat, but still...

No, harmony. Your opinion on this comes out of thin air. Don't get confused, dear.


You're saying there was no air in the hat?
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
Post Reply