Scratch, DCP, and the IRS

[_Mister Scratch]

supposed to interpret your l-skinny behavior,

Honest, clear-eyed readers who aren't among the fifteen or so people on the closed Skinny-L list would instantly recognize that they're in no position whatever to comment on Skinny-L.

You proudly posted your l-skinny comments and exchanges on SHIELDS. It is easy enough for readers to read them, and to evaluate your behavior. How do you think that people ought to interpret the things you wrote to James White? How do you think people ought to react given the fact that you invited your l-skinny pals to "dogpile" on White?

your Mike Quinn comments, and your insinuations regarding Robert Ritner?

As carefully culled and spun by you, or as they were actually made and intended?

I'd actually be very interested in hearing you explain the reasoning and motives behind your Quinn & Ritner comments. I've put up your verbatim quotes a number of times. If there is some other conclusion to come to beyond the ones I've offered, then I'd be interested to hear it.

Are we supposed to think you were doing these folks any favors, or that you had their best interests in mind? Are we supposed to believe that you were acting charitably, and in the proper spirit of Christ's teachings?

What would you know about charity and Christlikeness in your dealings? I've never seen so much as a trace of either in your treatment of me over the past 2-3 years.

Don't change the subject, Dan. If you have a clear and reasonable way of characterizing your behavior vis-a-vis Quinn, Ritner, and l-skinny, then I am interested in hearing it.

What, in your view, is the most accurate characterization of the way you behaved?

Fundamentally different from the way you've sought to portray it.

I didn't "portray" or "spin" anything. All I did was supply verbatim quotations from you, and offer up my own analysis. You still haven't told us how *you* would characterize your behavior regarding the above-mentioned circumstances.

[_Jason Bourne]

I didn't "portray" or "spin" anything. All I did was supply verbatim quotations from you, and offer up my own analysis. You still haven't told us how *you* would characterize your behavior regarding the above-mentioned circumstances.

This has to be the most disingenuous comment I have ever seen on this board. Come on Scratchy! You are the spinmeister galore! You are nothing but ellipses, hyperbole and innuendo. There is little substance to most if not all of what you post. And you are a damned coward smearing people anonymously. Yes I am anonymous too but I do not spend all my time on this board is character assassination. You are shameful.

[_Daniel Peterson]

The following is a standard response: Master Scartch has devoted himself since at least 2006 to publicly defaming me while maintaining his anonymity. I flatly deny virtually every allegation Master Scartch has ever made against me, and this one is no exception. I regard Master Scartch as an obsessive and malevolent loon, and have decided to refrain from further gratifying his weird fixation on me and those connected with me. Attempting conversation with him over the past many months has accomplished precisely nothing, and is, plainly, a complete waste of my time, especially given the fact that it's his self-described "mission" and "amusement" to be "perceived" by "Mopologists" as "full of hate." (Scartch, MDB, 1 October 2008)