You have no business telling antishock to "get out"---in fact, the board rules prohibit that. Further, you absolutely erupt when anyone tries to tell you something along those lines.
Translation: erupt=challenge.
FYI: I'm not the only poster on this board who has told folks who posted off topic to get off a thread. Do your homework.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
What "fingers" of doubt? Jersey: *you* were the one who inserted an irrelevant post onto *this* thread.
Irrelevant?
Let's look at some current claims posted on this thread, in no particular order:
Heck, if you can cough up something for #3, I may consider "outing" myself and posting a picture to the board.
1) I have offered, on at least a couple of occasions, a kind of "let's shake hands and let bygones be bygones" to DCP. Each time, he has essentially spat in my face. He would rather continue fighting then ever admit to any wrongdoing. But, I'll say it again: If he wants to fess up and admit to the rotten things he's done, I will permanently retire from the MB and completely delete the blog.
I'd like to offer you the opportunity to accept a truce once again, Prof. P. The choice is yours. Of course, this will mean that you'll have to make some unpleasant concessions, but would it be worth it? Just think: I would go away---permanently!! C'mon, there is no one alive whom you hate more than me. Would a minor apology be worth it, if it puts an end to my posting?
Yes, they were conditional, but nevertheless, I did offer to completely cease posting.
Mister Scratch wrote: A nice try. Here it is again:
What were those "claims" posted in response to?
Inquiries as to whether or not you'd ever offered the olive branch.
My post was in response to your claim that my comments here were irrelevant. The post, at which point, you chose to derail. The post wherein I listed your failure to follow through on your proposed claims and offers, such as your "promise" not to post DCP threads on this board.
Later, I specified which of your claims were conditional and contingent on a response from Daniel.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
Mister Scratch wrote: A nice try. Here it is again:
What were those "claims" posted in response to?
Inquiries as to whether or not you'd ever offered the olive branch.
Nope! Keep trying. I'm sure that you'll eventually be able to locate where the derailment occurred.
The post wherein I listed your failure to follow through on your proposed claims and offers, such as your "promise" not to post DCP threads on this board.
Incidentally, I responded to that post:
Mr. Scratch wrote:What was your point, and how would you like me to respond? That you think I'm "baiting"? What am I supposed to say to that? "Why, yes, Jersey Girl, I am just trying to bait a response!" "Why, yes, Jersey! My proposition was ignored, and so I did not cease posting!" "Why, yes, Jersey, my trip to Utah was canceled, and so I'm not going!"
Really, what kind of response did you want?
Remember? Or did you actually not want a response? Or a different kind of response?
Incidentally, I never really expected Scartch to come to Utah and take me out to lunch, so, when his alleged trip to Utah was "cancelled," I wasn't a bit surprised.
Daniel Peterson wrote:Incidentally, I never really expected Scartch to come to Utah and take me out to lunch, so, when his alleged trip to Utah was "cancelled," I wasn't a bit surprised.
Incidentally, I could make all kinds of promises about what I'm going to do, and I'll never have to be held to my word, since DCP will never express remorse for the various things he's done.
Daniel Peterson wrote:Incidentally, I never really expected Scartch to come to Utah and take me out to lunch, so, when his alleged trip to Utah was "cancelled," I wasn't a bit surprised.
Incidentally, I could make all kinds of promises about what I'm going to do, and I'll never have to be held to my word, since DCP will never express remorse for the various things he's done.
I've already pled guilty to the nuclear bomb attack on London, to the assassination of Dwight Eisenhower, to the fixing of the 1999 Superbowl, to the genocide of the Swedes, and to a whole host of equally mythical offenses. Yet you remain implacable.
You're a loon, Scartch. A nutcase. An obsessive monomaniac.
antishock8 wrote:Who in the f*** archives chats and bulletins?
Holy. s***.
Apparently both Scratch and myself copied chat logs, one each. You got a particular problem with that? If so, you might wanna get out of this kitchen, anti-thought, because it's clear and apparent that you don't know what goes on around here, and don't have a pony in this little side show derailment of Scratch's.