bcspace wrote:Like guy sajer, he just seems to skim the surface looking for a quick hit.
Now there's a man I miss.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
He delves into the substance of the article, if the substance of the article is innuendo.
No, I think he lifts innuendo from the article and ignores the substance which would prove or disprove the innuendo.
Feel free to read my latest examination of FARMS in the thread entitled, "FARMS's Smear Campaign Against Signature Books." Is there innuendo in the DCP article? Yes, in my opinion, there is. But the substance of the article is examined as well.
Feel free to read my latest examination of FARMS in the thread entitled, "FARMS's Smear Campaign Against Signature Books." Is there innuendo in the DCP article? Yes, in my opinion, there is. But the substance of the article is examined as well.
Thanks Scratch. Last couple of threads you seemed to ignore the substance.