Democracy in action: Dr. Shades knuckles under

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Re: Democracy in action: Dr. Shades knuckles under

Post by _Gadianton »

A few brief points Shades:
- it's either MDB or MAD/RFM, there is no middle-ground, moderate intervention. It's either free speech or handpick your members because the middle territory just sets expectations and then its endless discussions about the rules.

- because of the above, people who usually don't whine will start whining, and those who really left because they were offended would have left earlier under heavier moderation.

- all of those names I saw complaining about the quality of the board and the "personal attacks" and so on, are all names that on this and other boards have been a thorn in the side to many, many posters. Not necessarily me, but, they've annoyed and offended just as many as CT has.
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.

LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Democracy in action: Dr. Shades knuckles under

Post by _harmony »

Gadianton wrote:A few brief points Shades:
- it's either MDB or MAD/RFM, there is no middle-ground, moderate intervention. It's either free speech or handpick your members because the middle territory just sets expectations and then its endless discussions about the rules.

- because of the above, people who usually don't whine will start whining, and those who really left because they were offended would have left earlier under heavier moderation.

- all of those names I saw complaining about the quality of the board and the "personal attacks" and so on, are all names that on this and other boards have been a thorn in the side to many, many posters. Not necessarily me, but, they've annoyed and offended just as many as CT has.


I am not annoying (generally), nor am I offensive (usually). Neither is JAK or marg or Jason or Liz.

Just who do you think is in this discussion?
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_collegeterrace
_Emeritus
Posts: 603
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 7:28 am

Re: Democracy in action: Dr. Shades knuckles under

Post by _collegeterrace »

How about I mod the lower kingdom and move my threads to the middle one?

JEEZUZ people.

The ignore feature was made for me. USE IT and stop your whining.
... our church isn't true, but we have to keep up appearances so we don't get shunned by our friends and family, fired from our jobs, kicked out of our homes, ... Please don't tell on me. ~maklelan
_The Dude
_Emeritus
Posts: 2976
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:16 am

Re: Democracy in action: Dr. Shades knuckles under

Post by _The Dude »

Not sure which post is funnier. Harmony's or PP's...?

collegeterrace wrote:How about I mod the lower kingdom and move my threads to the middle one?


harmony wrote:I am not....


How about if harmony takes the Celestial, and PP takes the Terrestrial, and I'll just keep doing what I've been doing.
"And yet another little spot is smoothed out of the echo chamber wall..." Bond
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Democracy in action: Dr. Shades knuckles under

Post by _harmony »

The Dude wrote:Not sure which post is funnier. Harmony's or PP's...?

collegeterrace wrote:How about I mod the lower kingdom and move my threads to the middle one?


harmony wrote:I am not....


How about if harmony takes the Celestial, and PP takes the Terrestrial, and I'll just keep doing what I've been doing.


How about if Liz takes the Celestial, harmony takes the Terrestial, and PP takes the Telestial?... Oh, and you keep doing what you've been doing.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_bcspace
_Emeritus
Posts: 18534
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:48 pm

Re: Democracy in action: Dr. Shades knuckles under

Post by _bcspace »

I was (and still am) of the opinion that the judicious use of the ignore feature would solve those problems. Others disagreed, saying that offending posts must be moved to other forums, specifically the Telestial Forum.

So, what the heck? There's no reason to assume that I'm always right, so why not let democracy work its magic and give the people what they want?


Well, the original Athenian democracy included the notion of ostracism.....
Machina Sublime
Satan's Plan Deconstructed.
Your Best Resource On Joseph Smith's Polygamy.
Conservatism is the Gospel of Christ and the Plan of Salvation in Action.
The Degeneracy Of Progressivism.
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Re: Democracy in action: Dr. Shades knuckles under

Post by _Gadianton »

harmony wrote:
I am not annoying (generally), nor am I offensive (usually). Neither is JAK or marg or Jason or Liz.

Just who do you think is in this discussion?


You, Jersey Girl, JAK, Marg, mainly.

I'm judging the scene by your criteria, who has annoyed or offended the greatest number of people. Personal judgments aside.
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.

LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: Democracy in action: Dr. Shades knuckles under

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Gadianton wrote:- it's either MDB or MAD/RFM, there is no middle-ground, moderate intervention. It's either free speech or handpick your members because the middle territory just sets expectations and then its endless discussions about the rules.


I share your opinion, but apparently others don't. Therefore, I think it's time to allow them to give their ideas a test drive. Who knows? Perhaps I'll be surprised.

- because of the above, people who usually don't whine will start whining, and those who really left because they were offended would have left earlier under heavier moderation.


Hmm, I hadn't really thought of that. Harmony, what's your take? Of the three people who recently left, would they or wouldn't they have left earlier thanks to heavier moderation?

- all of those names I saw complaining about the quality of the board and the "personal attacks" and so on, are all names that on this and other boards have been a thorn in the side to many, many posters. Not necessarily me, but, they've annoyed and offended just as many as CT has.


Ha! That's an EXCELLENT point. And a funny one, too. :-)
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Re: Democracy in action: Dr. Shades knuckles under

Post by _Gadianton »

Of the three people who recently left, would they or wouldn't they have left earlier thanks to heavier moderation?


I'm not sure who is being discussed here, but some other questions to think about. Have these "three" posted elsewhere --- have they ever left a message board with moderate levels of intervention?

When you start guaranteeing protection, you set expectations and people become even more sensitive when they get dinged or when someone they don't like doesn't. Further, it becomes a huge debate on what constitutes offensive behavior. Direct name calling and vulgarity is a very small corner of the domain of things that offend.
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.

LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: Democracy in action: Dr. Shades knuckles under

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Gadianton wrote:When you start guaranteeing protection, you set expectations and people become even more sensitive when they get dinged or when someone they don't like doesn't. Further, it becomes a huge debate on what constitutes offensive behavior. Direct name calling and vulgarity is a very small corner of the domain of things that offend.


I fully agree with everything you wrote. Others don't, however, and since I've said everything I can possibly say, it's time we recognized that the only way to figure out who's right is to give their ideas a test drive.

More details to follow in an upcoming thread.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
Post Reply