The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART ONE: The set-up

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_rcrocket

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART ONE: The set-up

Post by _rcrocket »

beastie wrote:
Yep, when it comes to the massacre you are a fish in a barrel, having not read Wise, Brooks, or any other massacre scholar than Bagley. Have you even read Brodie? Just curious.


Once again, I refer to the Massacre thread for evidence of how well you shoot.


I guess that means you haven't read these sources? Why don't you take your 7000+ posts and read instead? You're a nasty person; you don't like people standing up to your nastiness, insults directed to spouses and children, and personal attacks?
_Ray A

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART ONE: The set-up

Post by _Ray A »

rcrocket wrote:You're a nasty person; you don't like people standing up to your nastiness, insults directed to spouses and children, and personal attacks?


Bob, didn't you say very recently that you like beastie?
_Yoda

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART ONE: The set-up

Post by _Yoda »

marg wrote:Yes Liz, for the Celestial.


Cool!

So, Marg has agreed to Mod for the Celestial. Harm, I think you indicated on another thread that you would be willing to Mod. Are you still game?
_Yoda

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART ONE: The set-up

Post by _Yoda »

Hey, Bob, since you seem to be so personally wounded by prior treatment, are you interested in putting your money where your mouth is, and be a Mod? Then you wouldn't have to "faux Mod".

;)
_collegeterrace
_Emeritus
Posts: 603
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 7:28 am

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART ONE: The set-up

Post by _collegeterrace »

rcrocket wrote:Hmm; I posted the thread where you did that; something about the number of children I have and relations with my wife? What is more personal than that?.

Bob, you divulged much personal information about your family, all on your own.

You posted images and had your blog in your sig which led to your picasa website with was chock full of unrestricted images of not only the lives of your children, but hundreds of scanned photographs from your family and you in your younger years.

I PM'd you as Boaz & Lidia and said after seeing your family photos I realized why you were entrenched in Mormonism and that I understood.

BOOM! The next thing I know, your picassa site is all but gone and then you left the board in a huff.

You were the foolish one to put your silly runner's blog in your sig. We followed that to all of your publicly viewable life on picassa.

Don't blame beastie for your own foolishness and stupidity. You are the one to blame for any public knowledge of your life.

by the way, let me give you a bit of advice... Your photography at best is mediocre --at least the recent stuff I saw on your picassa page before you rightfully removed it from public view. You lack an understanding of composition, posing, angles and how to read and use light, both natural and artificial.
... our church isn't true, but we have to keep up appearances so we don't get shunned by our friends and family, fired from our jobs, kicked out of our homes, ... Please don't tell on me. ~maklelan
_collegeterrace
_Emeritus
Posts: 603
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 7:28 am

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART ONE: The set-up

Post by _collegeterrace »

liz3564 wrote:Hey, Bob, since you seem to be so personally wounded by prior treatment, are you interested in putting your money where your mouth is, and be a Mod? Then you wouldn't have to "faux Mod".

;)
That would not be a good idea.

Think about it Liz and Shades, he would abuse his powers in an attempt to locate certain posters via IP address.

He is not to be trusted as a mod.
... our church isn't true, but we have to keep up appearances so we don't get shunned by our friends and family, fired from our jobs, kicked out of our homes, ... Please don't tell on me. ~maklelan
_Ray A

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART ONE: The set-up

Post by _Ray A »

Here is your comment, Bob.

rcrocket wrote:OK. I don't agree but I apologize.

I know you are trying to provoke me. You’re trolling. Big deal. I don’t care. Your behavior – not just towards me, but other posters like runtu – has been malicious.


I don't agree. I like Runtu, and I like you. I think you are very capable and nice to your friends. Just count me one of your friends and be nice to me.


But I'm not holding that against you. It just shows the complex nature of "Cyberspace".
_GoodK

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART ONE: The set-up

Post by _GoodK »

let's just keep in mind how much Bob really values and respects personal information and family lives when it comes to annonymous critics. If I remember correctly, he conspired to "out" me to my Mormon family after learning my identity.
_Ray A

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART ONE: The set-up

Post by _Ray A »

And by the way, Bob, I do like you. But perhaps there comes a point where we all have to say: "Let Mormonism screw my mind no more."
_Yoda

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART ONE: The set-up

Post by _Yoda »

collegeterrace wrote:
liz3564 wrote:Hey, Bob, since you seem to be so personally wounded by prior treatment, are you interested in putting your money where your mouth is, and be a Mod? Then you wouldn't have to "faux Mod".

;)
That would not be a good idea.

Think about it Liz and Shades, he would abuse his powers in an attempt to locate certain posters via IP address.

He is not to be trusted as a mod.


Keene could probably remove the IP address view function if that was a concern.

Frankly, I'm just curious if he is interested. I doubt it. Bob strikes me as someone who is content to whine on the sidelines. ;)

Prove me wrong, Bob. I would love to be pleasantly surprised.
Post Reply