The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART ONE: The set-up

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_collegeterrace
_Emeritus
Posts: 603
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 7:28 am

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART ONE: The set-up

Post by _collegeterrace »

rcrocket wrote:
collegeterrace wrote:You posted images and had your blog in your sig which led to your picasa website with was chock full of unrestricted images of not only the lives of your children, but hundreds of scanned photographs from your family and you in your younger years.


Huh? What photos? What happened to them?
EXACTLY. Why did you take them down?

I would never put them up unrestricted and in full public view in the first place. I hope you learned your lesson.
... our church isn't true, but we have to keep up appearances so we don't get shunned by our friends and family, fired from our jobs, kicked out of our homes, ... Please don't tell on me. ~maklelan
_collegeterrace
_Emeritus
Posts: 603
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 7:28 am

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART ONE: The set-up

Post by _collegeterrace »

liz3564 wrote:
GoodK wrote:I'll tell you what though, I'd be a lot happier if you-know-who would go on a date with me... That would truly make me happy. Be a pal and help me out


Ok, I'm totally speculating here....Do you have a crush on one of Bob's daughters, GoodK? If you do, that would just be too delicious as far as gossip is concerned. LOL
Oh man wouldn't that be sweet Jesus justice? One of Bob's daughters pulling and Emma and hooking up with GoodK???

GoodK, I am not comparing you to old Joe Smith, just comparing Emma's relationship with a man who was despised by her father and the possibility of one of Bob's daughters doing the same and you being the despised man.

That would be f'ing sweeet.
... our church isn't true, but we have to keep up appearances so we don't get shunned by our friends and family, fired from our jobs, kicked out of our homes, ... Please don't tell on me. ~maklelan
_GoodK

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART ONE: The set-up

Post by _GoodK »

liz3564 wrote:
GoodK wrote:I'll tell you what though, I'd be a lot happier if you-know-who would go on a date with me... That would truly make me happy. Be a pal and help me out


Ok, I'm totally speculating here....Do you have a crush on one of Bob's daughters, GoodK? If you do, that would just be too delicious as far as gossip is concerned. LOL


Not just a crush, I'm in love...
_Yoda

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART ONE: The set-up

Post by _Yoda »

GoodK wrote:Not just a crush, I'm in love...


Is this a Romeo and Juliet situation? Are the feelings mutual on her end? Inquiring minds want to know. ;)
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART ONE: The set-up

Post by _The Nehor »

Ray A wrote:
The Nehor wrote:
By then everyone will be dead. Everyone is a winner.


Your blood-curling fantasies worry me, Nehor.


I have no fantasies about Canadian sports....even 'blood' variants of them.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_Yoda

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART ONE: The set-up

Post by _Yoda »

Since this thread got massively derailed...and partially by me...(sorry, Shades)...I just thought I would make one last attempt to get the thread back on track.

Is this Moderatorial experiment actually going to happen, or are we simply back to business as usual?
_John Larsen
_Emeritus
Posts: 1895
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:16 pm

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART ONE: The set-up

Post by _John Larsen »

liz3564 wrote:Since this thread got massively derailed...and partially by me...(sorry, Shades)...I just thought I would make one last attempt to get the thread back on track.

Is this Moderatorial experiment actually going to happen, or are we simply back to business as usual?

I am considering volunteering since I hate personal attacks. However, I don't know that I will be able to devote the time necessary and I am just not as in to it as I was 5 years ago. Consider me a maybe.

On a side note, I think this board is just experiencing a little topic fatigue. Most of the posters on this board have been at this a long time, often through various pseudonyms dating way back. The posters tend to know each other very well. I even feel a little intimidated and out of the loop in many of the discussion because of this. So I am not sure this will "save" the board, even if saving is necessary. It might help though. There are a few posters who like to drop their steaming pile on threads. I like them, but I wish they would stop. It is not helping anything.
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART ONE: The set-up

Post by _Dr. Shades »

liz3564 wrote:Is this Moderatorial experiment actually going to happen, or are we simply back to business as usual?


If harmony volunteers, then it'll happen. If she doesn't, then it's back to business as usual.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART ONE: The set-up

Post by _harmony »

Dr. Shades wrote:
liz3564 wrote:Is this Moderatorial experiment actually going to happen, or are we simply back to business as usual?


If harmony volunteers, then it'll happen. If she doesn't, then it's back to business as usual.


I already volunteered. However, I've been very impressed by the posters lately and the board seems to be running fairly smoothly just now. Perhaps we should just wait for the next bomb to drop, and start then?
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: The Great Moderatorial Experiment, PART ONE: The set-up

Post by _Dr. Shades »

harmony wrote:I already volunteered. However, I've been very impressed by the posters lately and the board seems to be running fairly smoothly just now. Perhaps we should just wait for the next bomb to drop, and start then?

That sounds reasonable to me. Just tell me when you want it to start, and we'll start it.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
Post Reply