Boyd K. Packer strikes back!

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Yoda

Re: Boyd K. Packer strikes back!

Post by _Yoda »

bcspace wrote:
Since he found out he was kissing his sister and then had a face rearrainging accident.


If you read the books, you find out that Luke actually gets married, has a son, and becomes a Grand Jedi Master.

(Yes, I'm THAT nerdy and THAT into Star Wars...LOL)
_Danna

Re: Boyd K. Packer strikes back!

Post by _Danna »

I thought Count Dooku was the gay character?

Image
_Trevor
_Emeritus
Posts: 7213
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: Boyd K. Packer strikes back!

Post by _Trevor »

Gazelam wrote:Since when is Luke considered a gay character?


Luke was always the gay character. That kiss with Leia was so bad.
“I was hooked from the start,” Snoop Dogg said. “We talked about the purpose of life, played Mousetrap, and ate brownies. The kids thought it was off the hook, for real.”
_Trevor
_Emeritus
Posts: 7213
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: Boyd K. Packer strikes back!

Post by _Trevor »

The Nehor wrote:Poor Jek Porkins


Good one, Nehor. Classy response.
“I was hooked from the start,” Snoop Dogg said. “We talked about the purpose of life, played Mousetrap, and ate brownies. The kids thought it was off the hook, for real.”
_Trevor
_Emeritus
Posts: 7213
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: Boyd K. Packer strikes back!

Post by _Trevor »

The Nehor wrote:Image


Damn that photographer! I knew it was a bad idea to have those fantasy pictures of me taken for my wife. Privacy agreement. Pshah!
“I was hooked from the start,” Snoop Dogg said. “We talked about the purpose of life, played Mousetrap, and ate brownies. The kids thought it was off the hook, for real.”
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: Boyd K. Packer strikes back!

Post by _The Nehor »

Mister Scratch wrote:
Huh? There is nothing random about it, Nehor. It merely demonstrates your essential cluelessness. You interpret "steamed" as having something to do with "lust," whereas a normal person would understand that it means, "angry." You have only demonstrated your own prurience, my friend.


I interpreted it as no such thing. You accused me of being steamed (randomly) so I randomly accused you of being lustful. For example, using Scratchian logic (i.e. making s*** up) I can now say with authority that you are enraged because your mom just asked you to take out the garbage and you think the $50 you pay for rent every month (off your part-time job at the arcade) entitles you to more respect.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_Scottie
_Emeritus
Posts: 4166
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:54 pm

Re: Boyd K. Packer strikes back!

Post by _Scottie »

liz3564 wrote:
bcspace wrote:
Since he found out he was kissing his sister and then had a face rearrainging accident.


If you read the books, you find out that Luke actually gets married, has a son, and becomes a Grand Jedi Master.

(Yes, I'm THAT nerdy and THAT into Star Wars...LOL)

I thought Jedi were forbidden to love??

Isn't that what caused Anakins downfall??
If there's one thing I've learned from this board, it's that consensual sex with multiple partners is okay unless God commands it. - Abman

I find this place to be hostile toward all brands of stupidity. That's why I like it. - Some Schmo
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: Boyd K. Packer strikes back!

Post by _The Nehor »

Scottie wrote:I thought Jedi were forbidden to love??

Isn't that what caused Anakins downfall??


Luke rewrote the rules. Anakin's downfall was fear of loss.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Re: Boyd K. Packer strikes back!

Post by _Mister Scratch »

The Nehor wrote:
Mister Scratch wrote:
Huh? There is nothing random about it, Nehor. It merely demonstrates your essential cluelessness. You interpret "steamed" as having something to do with "lust," whereas a normal person would understand that it means, "angry." You have only demonstrated your own prurience, my friend.


I interpreted it as no such thing. You accused me of being steamed (randomly) so I randomly accused you of being lustful. For example, using Scratchian logic (i.e. making s*** up) .


Ah, stooping to profanity now. I'm sure that other members of the Church are so proud to have you on board.
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: Boyd K. Packer strikes back!

Post by _The Nehor »

Mister Scratch wrote:Ah, stooping to profanity now. I'm sure that other members of the Church are so proud to have you on board.


Should I respond by asking if I think your mom would be proud of what you do here? I should ask her when she comes over tonight. ;)
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
Post Reply