collegeterrace wrote:Until I see the content of said harassment, I cannot comment.
Good is in the eye of the giver and evil in the eye of the receiver.
Comments about female genetalia come to mind.
collegeterrace wrote:Until I see the content of said harassment, I cannot comment.
Good is in the eye of the giver and evil in the eye of the receiver.
Or the washing device of said genitalia?harmony wrote:collegeterrace wrote:Until I see the content of said harassment, I cannot comment.
Good is in the eye of the giver and evil in the eye of the receiver.
Comments about female genetalia come to mind.
rcrocket wrote:Too bad. Somebody invite her back.
Gadianton wrote:Well, I would say reaching into the realm of the most vulgar ways someone can put something as in your example for me is grounds for simply editing out. I'm not a huge respector of "women", I don't have any respect for someone just because of their sex. I've known enough women to know they are every bit as foul as men are. But sure, extreme vulgar name-calling is grounds for editing I'd think and if repeated over and over, more punishment, just because of the work required to keep up.