Harassment On Mormon Discussions.

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Locked
_Pokatator
_Emeritus
Posts: 1417
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:38 pm

Re: Harassment On Mormon Discussions.

Post by _Pokatator »

rcrocket wrote:Beastie, I hate to say it, but you are a stark raving hypocrite in the way you treat your adversaries. YOU expose in real life details. YOU make crude sexual references. I am the number one victim.



You are the hypocrite here and everyone knows it.
I think it would be morally right to lie about your religion to edit the article favorably.
bcspace
_antishock8
_Emeritus
Posts: 2425
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:02 am

Re: Harassment On Mormon Discussions.

Post by _antishock8 »

I seriously have no idea what's going on. This is why I have a "no PM" policy. I like to keep everything above the board. I rarely, if ever, will allow a PM to go beyond one message.

Whatever. I think Beastie has excellent posts, and incredible insight. I like Harmony because she's willing to scrutinize her church. I didn't like Jersey Girl because she's a bitch with nothing to contribute. Charity would be fine if she were a little more like Harmony. I have no idea who Moniker is beyond the thread she recently started. Liz is pretty cool; I like her easy-goin' style. Hrm... I can't really think of other females off the top of my head.

That aside, if someone is messin' with you put them on ignore for “F”'s sake. It's too easy. Jesus.
You can’t trust adults to tell you the truth.

Scream the lie, whisper the retraction.- The Left
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Re: Harassment On Mormon Discussions.

Post by _asbestosman »

rcrocket wrote:There has not been a single TBM Mormon on this board with whom you have carried on any sort of dialogue where you haven't savaged him or her with personal, sarcastic or rancorous attacks.

Are you the only TBM on this board? I don't recall Beastie personally attacking me.

Evidence please.
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Re: Harassment On Mormon Discussions.

Post by _asbestosman »

In case Shades missed it.

asbestosman wrote:Well Shades, what would you think of the LDS church if it used that excuse to block access to changes in Poelman's General Conference talk, changes in the Doctrine and Covenants / Book of Commandments, Changes in the Book or Mormon, etc.?

I'm not saying you did the wrong thing. I'm just trying to make you look at it from another angle.
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Harassment On Mormon Discussions.

Post by _Jersey Girl »

I'm going to repost a recent post I made in the Off Topic Forum because I think it fits with the OP of this particular thread. In reply to beastie as follows:

beastie,

In your post above, you focus on what I think is the reality of the situation. While a person who has been/felt harrassed wishes for his/her attackers/harrassers/abusers to admit they have wronged another person, time and experience tells me that it's not likely to happen.

People whose psychological make up allows them to habitually attack/harrass/abuse or perhaps even objectify other human beings, typically do not see their part in a situation as being potentially destructive to others. They are there perhaps for the adrenalin rush that comes from engaging/confronting another in that way and little else. That is to say they are self focused and likely socially dysfunctional to the point of lacking true conscience in such a matter.

Therefore, attempting to exact an admission or apology from them is of little use for if even an ambiguous public admission or apology should be forthcoming, predictably it will be as superficial as they themselves are internally.

On boards like these, we know and can expect to know very little about the person on the other side of the screen except their words. What we know about ourselves is our best strength in the face of cruel treatment by strangers we interact with online.

My best and only advice to Moniker (and others who feel attacked, misused, mischaracterized, used, harrassed) is to take what you know to be true about yourself....and live it when confronted with those who would "despitefully use you".


Following up with beasties current remark on this thread:

beastie wrote:I have no interest in continuing to participate on this board for various reasons, but the endless back and forth with people like Bob is exhibit A.


The endless back and forth that beastie identifies is not my personal "exhibit A" so much as is this entire thread. The OP here that was apparently intended to facilitate thoughtful discussion, devolved into personalized attack on or around page 4.

This is a glaring example of why I have lost interest in this board.

The front page of this board claims "free discussion". Just prior to my decision to discontinue participation here, whenever I opened a thread I saw post after post of personalized attack, innuendo, libelous remarks, gossip and sexualized remarks directed at both male and female posters.

While admin certainly has the right to administer this board in whatever way he/they see fit, I see little or no reason to invest time in it for while the board is intended to "look professional", when I open the pages, what I see is a combination of comic book and National Enquirer.

Is this "free discussion" or is it "discussion-free"?

I am no stranger to insult (both giving and receiving--a little well placed sarcasm is good for the soul now and then ;-) but when insult, gossip, innuendo, libel and sexualized comments become pervasive, I am left to believe that a number of persons (except for an ever-shrinking group of good and thoughtful posters, you know who you are-- I sent goodbye's to you :-) in this community are socially dysfunctional to the point where personalized attack becomes the social norm and at that point, I've lost interest.

I value what I do with my mind and I see no reason to fill it with the remarks of people who repeatedly fail to value other human beings. I'm not certain what benefit there is to free speech, absent standards. Surely, topical discussion could have been the one standard that was consistently enforced and what I had hoped to see happen on this board when it was first "birthed".

Watch what harmony is doing and learn from her. She's doing just exactly what should have been done two years ago and wasn't.

I do wish you all well.

Jersey Girl
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Ray A

Re: Harassment On Mormon Discussions.

Post by _Ray A »

At the moment, MDB would be a psychologist's dream.

I think you'll need to tune in a bit more to your insight into human nature, Shades. The same thing happens when a street fight occurs, or a serious accident - everyone gathers to watch. As long as they are not involved, or someone they love and care about isn't involved.

Good night.
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: Harassment On Mormon Discussions.

Post by _Dr. Shades »

asbestosman wrote:In case Shades missed it.

asbestosman wrote:Well Shades, what would you think of the LDS church if it used that excuse to block access to changes in Poelman's General Conference talk, changes in the Doctrine and Covenants / Book of Commandments, Changes in the Book or Mormon, etc.?

I'm not saying you did the wrong thing. I'm just trying to make you look at it from another angle.

Okay, you got me. I was wrong. I apologize. I repent for my misdoings. The road to Hell is paved with good intentions. It won't happen again.

Ray A wrote:I think you'll need to tune in a bit more to your insight into human nature, Shades. The same thing happens when a street fight occurs, or a serious accident - everyone gathers to watch. As long as they are not involved, or someone they love and care about isn't involved.

What do you suggest? Please be specific.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_ludwigm
_Emeritus
Posts: 10158
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:07 am

Re: Harassment On Mormon Discussions.

Post by _ludwigm »

GoodK wrote:
ludwigm wrote:As a readaholic, during reading in english language, I meet many new words.
I don't understand why, the books I read miss this type of words ...
Well ludwigm, these types of words don't appear in books, typically. You must go to an American public high school to learn words like these.

Thank You. I am totally satisfied with the schools I had in Hungary. The losings are negligible, I think. by the way, that level of education is called middle school here.
- Whenever a poet or preacher, chief or wizard spouts gibberish, the human race spends centuries deciphering the message. - Umberto Eco
- To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei
_ludwigm
_Emeritus
Posts: 10158
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:07 am

Re: Harassment On Mormon Discussions.

Post by _ludwigm »

Dr. Shades wrote:...
Okay, you got me. I was wrong. I apologize. I repent for my misdoings. The road to Hell is paved with good intentions. It won't happen again.
...

Okay, we got You once and for all. From this point on, we all know why did You apostatized.

These words were never used by church leaders. You must have learned them from some anti-mormon or atheist literature.

.
CENSURE!!! Somebody edited out four empty line from here:
|
V
V
V
Last edited by Guest on Mon Dec 01, 2008 7:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Whenever a poet or preacher, chief or wizard spouts gibberish, the human race spends centuries deciphering the message. - Umberto Eco
- To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Re: Harassment On Mormon Discussions.

Post by _Some Schmo »

ludwigm wrote:
Dr. Shades wrote:...
Okay, you got me. I was wrong. I apologize. I repent for my misdoings. The road to Hell is paved with good intentions. It won't happen again.
...

Okay, we got You once and for all. From this point on, we all know why did You apostatized.

These words were never used by church leaders. You must have learned them from some anti-mormon or atheist literature.

LMAO... good one.

As for this thread... wow. I go away for a week or two and all hell breaks loose. And here I thought it was always me who caused it.

And to whatever male posters are sexually harassing the ladies behind the scenes, well... grow the “F” up. Holy Christ.
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
Locked